Scalable Knowledge Refactoring using Constrained Optimisation
0
🛸
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a new approach to "knowledge refactoring" - compressing logic programs by introducing new rules.
- Current approaches struggle to scale to large programs, so this research aims to overcome that limitation.
- The key ideas are to encode the problem using decision variables based on literals rather than rules, and to focus on linear invented rules.
- The results show this new approach can refactor programs faster and with more compression than previous methods, sometimes by 60%.
Plain English Explanation
Knowledge refactoring is the process of taking a complex set of logical rules and simplifying them by introducing new rules. This can make the overall program more efficient and easier to understand.
The researchers recognized that current approaches to knowledge refactoring have difficulty scaling up to work with very large programs. To address this, they developed a new method based on constrained optimization.
The key innovations are:
-
Representing the problem in terms of individual literals (the basic components of logical statements) rather than entire rules. This allows for more flexibility in finding optimal solutions.
-
Focusing on linear invented rules - new rules that are simple mathematical combinations of existing ones. This makes the optimization process more tractable.
The researchers tested this approach on a variety of logical programs and found that it could refactor them faster and with greater compression than previous state-of-the-art methods, sometimes improving compression by as much as 60%.
Technical Explanation
The researchers' key insight was to model the knowledge refactoring problem using decision variables based on individual literals rather than entire rules. This allows for a more flexible and scalable optimization process compared to previous approaches.
They also focus on linear invented rules - new rules that are simple mathematical combinations of existing ones. This makes the constrained optimization problem more tractable to solve.
The researchers evaluated their approach on a range of logical programs from multiple domains. The results show that their method can refactor programs faster and with greater compression than the previous state-of-the-art, sometimes improving compression by up to 60%.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling new approach to knowledge refactoring that addresses key limitations of prior methods. However, the evaluation is limited to relatively small and synthetic programs. It would be valuable to see how the method performs on much larger, real-world logical programs that existing techniques may struggle with.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential for the introduced rules to introduce unwanted logical inferences or unintended consequences. Careful analysis of the semantic properties of the refactored programs would be an important area for further research.
Overall, this work represents a significant advance in the field of knowledge representation and reasoning, but further research is needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and practical implications of the proposed approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel constrained optimization-based approach to knowledge refactoring that can significantly outperform previous methods in terms of both speed and compression. By encoding the problem in terms of individual literals and focusing on linear invented rules, the researchers have developed a scalable and effective technique for simplifying complex logical programs.
While further research is needed to fully understand the implications and potential pitfalls of this approach, the results presented here suggest that it could have important applications in fields like program synthesis, knowledge engineering, and logical reasoning. The ability to dramatically compress logical programs while preserving their core semantics could lead to significant efficiency gains and broader accessibility of these powerful representational tools.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛸
0
Scalable Knowledge Refactoring using Constrained Optimisation
Minghao Liu, David M. Cerna, Filipe Gouveia, Andrew Cropper
Knowledge refactoring compresses a logic program by introducing new rules. Current approaches struggle to scale to large programs. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a constrained optimisation refactoring approach. Our first key idea is to encode the problem with decision variables based on literals rather than rules. Our second key idea is to focus on linear invented rules. Our empirical results on multiple domains show that our approach can refactor programs quicker and with more compression than the previous state-of-the-art approach, sometimes by 60%.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Relational decomposition for program synthesis
C'eline Hocquette, Andrew Cropper
We introduce a novel approach to program synthesis that decomposes complex functional tasks into simpler relational synthesis sub-tasks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using an off-the-shelf inductive logic programming (ILP) system on three challenging datasets. Our results show that (i) a relational representation can outperform a functional one, and (ii) an off-the-shelf ILP system with a relational encoding can outperform domain-specific approaches.
Read more8/23/2024
🤿
0
Semantic Objective Functions: A distribution-aware method for adding logical constraints in deep learning
Miguel Angel Mendez-Lucero, Enrique Bojorquez Gallardo, Vaishak Belle
Issues of safety, explainability, and efficiency are of increasing concern in learning systems deployed with hard and soft constraints. Symbolic Constrained Learning and Knowledge Distillation techniques have shown promising results in this area, by embedding and extracting knowledge, as well as providing logical constraints during neural network training. Although many frameworks exist to date, through an integration of logic and information geometry, we provide a construction and theoretical framework for these tasks that generalize many approaches. We propose a loss-based method that embeds knowledge-enforces logical constraints-into a machine learning model that outputs probability distributions. This is done by constructing a distribution from the external knowledge/logic formula and constructing a loss function as a linear combination of the original loss function with the Fisher-Rao distance or Kullback-Leibler divergence to the constraint distribution. This construction includes logical constraints in the form of propositional formulas (Boolean variables), formulas of a first-order language with finite variables over a model with compact domain (categorical and continuous variables), and in general, likely applicable to any statistical model that was pretrained with semantic information. We evaluate our method on a variety of learning tasks, including classification tasks with logic constraints, transferring knowledge from logic formulas, and knowledge distillation from general distributions.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Search-Based LLMs for Code Optimization
Shuzheng Gao, Cuiyun Gao, Wenchao Gu, Michael Lyu
The code written by developers usually suffers from efficiency problems and contain various performance bugs. These inefficiencies necessitate the research of automated refactoring methods for code optimization. Early research in code optimization employs rule-based methods and focuses on specific inefficiency issues, which are labor-intensive and suffer from the low coverage issue. Recent work regards the task as a sequence generation problem, and resorts to deep learning (DL) techniques such as large language models (LLMs). These methods typically prompt LLMs to directly generate optimized code. Although these methods show state-of-the-art performance, such one-step generation paradigm is hard to achieve an optimal solution. First, complex optimization methods such as combinatorial ones are hard to be captured by LLMs. Second, the one-step generation paradigm poses challenge in precisely infusing the knowledge required for effective code optimization within LLMs, resulting in under-optimized code.To address these problems, we propose to model this task from the search perspective, and propose a search-based LLMs framework named SBLLM that enables iterative refinement and discovery of improved optimization methods. SBLLM synergistically integrate LLMs with evolutionary search and consists of three key components: 1) an execution-based representative sample selection part that evaluates the fitness of each existing optimized code and prioritizes promising ones to pilot the generation of improved code; 2) an adaptive optimization pattern retrieval part that infuses targeted optimization patterns into the model for guiding LLMs towards rectifying and progressively enhancing their optimization methods; and 3) a genetic operator-inspired chain-of-thought prompting part that aids LLMs in combining different optimization methods and generating improved optimization methods.
Read more8/23/2024