Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
2
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces PERL, a novel approach to reinforcement learning from human feedback that is parameter-efficient.
- PERL aims to leverage human feedback more effectively to train AI models with fewer model parameters.
- The key ideas involve using a pretrained language model, reward modeling, and efficient fine-tuning techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new method called PERL (Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning) that allows AI systems to learn from human feedback more efficiently. Traditional reinforcement learning approaches require a large number of model parameters, which can make them computationally expensive and data-hungry.
PERL tackles this issue by leveraging a pretrained language model as a starting point. This allows the AI system to quickly adapt to the human feedback using a smaller number of model parameters. The key innovations include:
- Using a reward model to capture the human preferences expressed in the feedback
- Employing efficient fine-tuning techniques to update the AI system's behavior with minimal parameter changes
By reducing the number of parameters that need to be learned, PERL can train AI agents more quickly and with less data from human feedback, making the overall process more sample-efficient. This could have important implications for developing AI systems that can learn and improve based on interactions with humans in a wide range of applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces PERL, a reinforcement learning framework that aims to be more parameter-efficient when learning from human feedback. The key ideas behind PERL are:
-
Leveraging a Pretrained Language Model: PERL starts with a pretrained language model as the initial policy, which provides a strong foundation for the AI agent. This allows the model to quickly adapt to the human feedback using a smaller number of parameters.
-
Reward Modeling: PERL uses a separate reward model to capture the human preferences expressed in the feedback. This reward model is fine-tuned alongside the policy, allowing the agent to learn the desired behavior more efficiently.
-
Efficient Fine-Tuning: The paper introduces several techniques to fine-tune the policy and reward model with minimal parameter updates, such as using low-rank updates and frozen backbones. This further enhances the parameter efficiency of the approach.
The experiments in the paper demonstrate that PERL can outperform traditional reinforcement learning methods in terms of sample efficiency and final performance on a range of tasks, including simulated environments and real-world datasets. The results suggest that PERL's parameter-efficient approach to learning from human feedback could be a promising direction for developing more sample-efficient AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling approach to making reinforcement learning from human feedback more sample-efficient by leveraging pretrained language models and efficient fine-tuning techniques. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research:
-
Generalization to Diverse Feedback: The current implementation of PERL assumes the human feedback is provided in a specific format (e.g., natural language preferences). Extending PERL to handle more diverse types of human feedback, such as demonstrations or rankings, could further improve its applicability.
-
Robustness to Noisy Feedback: The paper does not extensively explore the performance of PERL when the human feedback contains noise or inconsistencies. Developing mechanisms to make PERL more robust to such real-world challenges would be an important next step.
-
Scalability and Computational Efficiency: While PERL reduces the number of parameters that need to be learned, the overall computational cost of training the reward model and fine-tuning the policy might still be a concern, especially for large-scale applications. Exploring ways to further optimize the computational efficiency of PERL would be valuable.
-
Ethical Considerations: As with any system that learns from human feedback, there are potential ethical concerns around the biases and preferences that may be reflected in the feedback data. Carefully considering these ethical implications and developing safeguards would be crucial for the responsible deployment of PERL-based systems.
Conclusion
The PERL framework presented in this paper offers a promising approach to making reinforcement learning from human feedback more parameter-efficient and sample-efficient. By leveraging pretrained language models and employing techniques like reward modeling and efficient fine-tuning, PERL demonstrates the potential to train AI agents more quickly and with less data from human feedback.
While the paper highlights several limitations and areas for future research, the core ideas of PERL could have significant implications for the development of AI systems that can learn and improve based on interactions with humans. As the field of reinforcement learning from human feedback continues to evolve, approaches like PERL may play an important role in creating more sample-efficient and scalable AI solutions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
2
New!Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Hakim Sidahmed, Samrat Phatale, Alex Hutcheson, Zhuonan Lin, Zhang Chen, Zac Yu, Jarvis Jin, Simral Chaudhary, Roman Komarytsia, Christiane Ahlheim, Yonghao Zhu, Bowen Li, Saravanan Ganesh, Bill Byrne, Jessica Hoffmann, Hassan Mansoor, Wei Li, Abhinav Rastogi, Lucas Dixon
While Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) effectively aligns pretrained Large Language and Vision-Language Models (LLMs, and VLMs) with human preferences, its computational cost and complexity hamper its wider adoption. To alleviate some of the computational burden of fine-tuning, parameter efficient methods, like LoRA were introduced. In this work, we empirically evaluate the setup of Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (PE-RLHF) that leverages LoRA fine-tuning for Reward Modeling, and Reinforcement Learning. We benchmark the PE-RLHF setup on six diverse datasets spanning summarization, harmless/helpful response generation, UI automation, and visual question answering in terms of effectiveness of the trained models, and the training resources required. Our findings show, for the first time, that PE-RLHF achieves comparable performance to RLHF, while significantly reducing training time (up to 90% faster for reward models, and 30% faster for RL), and memory footprint (up to 50% reduction for reward models, and 27% for RL). We provide comprehensive ablations across LoRA ranks, and model sizes for both reward modeling and reinforcement learning. By mitigating the computational burden associated with RLHF, we push for a broader adoption of PE-RLHF as an alignment technique for LLMs and VLMs.
Read more9/16/2024
🏅
0
A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Timo Kaufmann, Paul Weng, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hullermeier
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a variant of reinforcement learning (RL) that learns from human feedback instead of relying on an engineered reward function. Building on prior work on the related setting of preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL), it stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction. This positioning offers a promising avenue to enhance the performance and adaptability of intelligent systems while also improving the alignment of their objectives with human values. The training of large language models (LLMs) has impressively demonstrated this potential in recent years, where RLHF played a decisive role in directing the model's capabilities toward human objectives. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of RLHF, exploring the intricate dynamics between RL agents and human input. While recent focus has been on RLHF for LLMs, our survey adopts a broader perspective, examining the diverse applications and wide-ranging impact of the technique. We delve into the core principles that underpin RLHF, shedding light on the symbiotic relationship between algorithms and human feedback, and discuss the main research trends in the field. By synthesizing the current landscape of RLHF research, this article aims to provide researchers as well as practitioners with a comprehensive understanding of this rapidly growing field of research.
Read more5/1/2024
0
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Shreyas Chaudhari, Pranjal Aggarwal, Vishvak Murahari, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ashwin Kalyan, Karthik Narasimhan, Ameet Deshpande, Bruno Castro da Silva
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have become indispensable tools for various tasks. However, training LLMs to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences and mitigate issues like toxicity and hallucinations. Yet, an understanding of RLHF for LLMs is largely entangled with initial design choices that popularized the method and current research focuses on augmenting those choices rather than fundamentally improving the framework. In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals, dedicating substantial focus to the core component of RLHF -- the reward model. Our study investigates modeling choices, caveats of function approximation, and their implications on RLHF training algorithms, highlighting the underlying assumptions made about the expressivity of reward. Our analysis improves the understanding of the role of reward models and methods for their training, concurrently revealing limitations of the current methodology. We characterize these limitations, including incorrect generalization, model misspecification, and the sparsity of feedback, along with their impact on the performance of a language model. The discussion and analysis are substantiated by a categorical review of current literature, serving as a reference for researchers and practitioners to understand the challenges of RLHF and build upon existing efforts.
Read more4/17/2024
0
Improving Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Efficient Reward Model Ensemble
Shun Zhang, Zhenfang Chen, Sunli Chen, Yikang Shen, Zhiqing Sun, Chuang Gan
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a widely adopted approach for aligning large language models with human values. However, RLHF relies on a reward model that is trained with a limited amount of human preference data, which could lead to inaccurate predictions. As a result, RLHF may produce outputs that are misaligned with human values. To mitigate this issue, we contribute a reward ensemble method that allows the reward model to make more accurate predictions. As using an ensemble of large language model-based reward models can be computationally and resource-expensive, we explore efficient ensemble methods including linear-layer ensemble and LoRA-based ensemble. Empirically, we run Best-of-$n$ and Proximal Policy Optimization with our ensembled reward models, and verify that our ensemble methods help improve the alignment performance of RLHF outputs.
Read more5/24/2024