Parameter Identification for Electrochemical Models of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Bayesian Optimization

Read original: arXiv:2405.10750 - Published 5/20/2024 by Jianzong Pi, Samuel Filgueira da Silva, Mehmet Fatih Ozkan, Abhishek Gupta, Marcello Canova
Total Score

0

Parameter Identification for Electrochemical Models of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Bayesian Optimization

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a Bayesian optimization approach for identifying parameters in electrochemical models of lithium-ion batteries.
  • The goal is to accurately estimate key parameters in these models, which are important for battery management and optimization.
  • Bayesian optimization is used to efficiently search the parameter space and find the optimal values that best fit experimental data.

Plain English Explanation

Lithium-ion batteries are widely used in electric vehicles, smartphones, and other electronics. Accurately modeling the behavior of these batteries is crucial for optimizing their performance and lifespan. This paper introduces a method using Bayesian optimization to identify the key parameters in electrochemical models of lithium-ion batteries.

The electrochemical models used to describe lithium-ion batteries contain various parameters, such as the rate of chemical reactions and the diffusion of lithium ions. These parameters are difficult to measure directly and must be estimated by fitting the model to experimental data. The researchers use Bayesian optimization, a powerful technique for efficiently searching complex parameter spaces, to find the optimal parameter values that best match the observed battery behavior.

Bayesian optimization works by building a probabilistic model of the objective function (in this case, the error between the model and the data) and then strategically exploring the parameter space to find the global minimum. This approach is more efficient than traditional trial-and-error methods, as it can identify the optimal parameters with fewer experiments. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several lithium-ion battery models and show that it outperforms other parameter estimation techniques.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a Bayesian optimization framework for identifying parameters in electrochemical models of lithium-ion batteries. The authors consider two well-known battery models: the single particle model (SPM) and the single particle model with electrolyte (SPME). These models describe the electrochemical processes within the battery, such as lithium-ion intercalation, solid-state diffusion, and charge transport.

The objective is to find the optimal values of the model parameters that minimize the error between the model predictions and experimental data. To accomplish this, the authors formulate the parameter identification problem as a Bayesian optimization task. They construct a Gaussian process surrogate model of the objective function (the error between model and data) and use an acquisition function, such as expected improvement, to guide the search for the optimal parameters.

The effectiveness of the Bayesian optimization approach is demonstrated on both simulated and experimental data for lithium-ion batteries. The authors show that their method can accurately estimate the model parameters, outperforming traditional techniques like least-squares fitting. They also investigate the impact of different experimental conditions, such as the choice of input current profiles, on the parameter identification process.

Additionally, the authors present an adaptive Bayesian optimization strategy that adjusts the exploration-exploitation tradeoff during the optimization process. This approach helps to balance the need for thorough exploration of the parameter space with the desire to quickly converge to the optimal solution.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed approach for identifying parameters in electrochemical models of lithium-ion batteries using Bayesian optimization. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on both simulated and experimental data, showing that it outperforms traditional parameter estimation techniques.

One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on the accuracy of the underlying electrochemical models. If the models do not fully capture the complex physical and chemical processes within the battery, the parameter identification may not be able to fully resolve the discrepancies between the model and the experimental data. Further research could explore ways to incorporate model uncertainty into the Bayesian optimization framework.

Additionally, the paper does not address the computational cost of the Bayesian optimization process, which can be significant for complex models with many parameters. Investigating methods to reduce the computational burden, such as by leveraging parallel computing or developing more efficient surrogate models, could enhance the practical applicability of the approach.

Overall, the research presented in this paper advances the state of the art in battery modeling and parameter estimation, and the Bayesian optimization framework could be broadly applicable to other domains where complex models need to be calibrated to experimental data.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a Bayesian optimization approach for identifying parameters in electrochemical models of lithium-ion batteries. The method efficiently searches the parameter space to find the optimal values that best fit experimental data, outperforming traditional parameter estimation techniques.

The ability to accurately model lithium-ion battery behavior is crucial for improving battery management, optimization, and design. By using Bayesian optimization to identify the key parameters in these models, the researchers have developed a powerful tool that can help advance the development of more efficient and longer-lasting lithium-ion batteries, with applications in electric vehicles, consumer electronics, and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Parameter Identification for Electrochemical Models of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Bayesian Optimization
Total Score

0

Parameter Identification for Electrochemical Models of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Bayesian Optimization

Jianzong Pi, Samuel Filgueira da Silva, Mehmet Fatih Ozkan, Abhishek Gupta, Marcello Canova

Efficient parameter identification of electrochemical models is crucial for accurate monitoring and control of lithium-ion cells. This process becomes challenging when applied to complex models that rely on a considerable number of interdependent parameters that affect the output response. Gradient-based and metaheuristic optimization techniques, although previously employed for this task, are limited by their lack of robustness, high computational costs, and susceptibility to local minima. In this study, Bayesian Optimization is used for tuning the dynamic parameters of an electrochemical equivalent circuit battery model (E-ECM) for a nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC)-graphite cell. The performance of the Bayesian Optimization is compared with baseline methods based on gradient-based and metaheuristic approaches. The robustness of the parameter optimization method is tested by performing verification using an experimental drive cycle. The results indicate that Bayesian Optimization outperforms Gradient Descent and PSO optimization techniques, achieving reductions on average testing loss by 28.8% and 5.8%, respectively. Moreover, Bayesian optimization significantly reduces the variance in testing loss by 95.8% and 72.7%, respectively.

Read more

5/20/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Learning Model Predictive Control Parameters via Bayesian Optimization for Battery Fast Charging

Sebastian Hirt, Andreas Hohl, Joachim Schaeffer, Johannes Pohlodek, Richard D. Braatz, Rolf Findeisen

Tuning parameters in model predictive control (MPC) presents significant challenges, particularly when there is a notable discrepancy between the controller's predictions and the actual behavior of the closed-loop plant. This mismatch may stem from factors like substantial model-plant differences, limited prediction horizons that do not cover the entire time of interest, or unforeseen system disturbances. Such mismatches can jeopardize both performance and safety, including constraint satisfaction. Traditional methods address this issue by modifying the finite horizon cost function to better reflect the overall operational cost, learning parts of the prediction model from data, or implementing robust MPC strategies, which might be either computationally intensive or overly cautious. As an alternative, directly optimizing or learning the controller parameters to enhance closed-loop performance has been proposed. We apply Bayesian optimization for efficient learning of unknown model parameters and parameterized constraint backoff terms, aiming to improve closed-loop performance of battery fast charging. This approach establishes a hierarchical control framework where Bayesian optimization directly fine-tunes closed-loop behavior towards a global and long-term objective, while MPC handles lower-level, short-term control tasks. For lithium-ion battery fast charging, we show that the learning approach not only ensures safe operation but also maximizes closed-loop performance. This includes maintaining the battery's operation below its maximum terminal voltage and reducing charging times, all achieved using a standard nominal MPC model with a short horizon and notable initial model-plant mismatch.

Read more

4/10/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Integrating Physics-Based Modeling with Machine Learning for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Hao Tu, Scott Moura, Yebin Wang, Huazhen Fang

Mathematical modeling of lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) is a primary challenge in advanced battery management. This paper proposes two new frameworks to integrate physics-based models with machine learning to achieve high-precision modeling for LiBs. The frameworks are characterized by informing the machine learning model of the state information of the physical model, enabling a deep integration between physics and machine learning. Based on the frameworks, a series of hybrid models are constructed, through combining an electrochemical model and an equivalent circuit model, respectively, with a feedforward neural network. The hybrid models are relatively parsimonious in structure and can provide considerable voltage predictive accuracy under a broad range of C-rates, as shown by extensive simulations and experiments. The study further expands to conduct aging-aware hybrid modeling, leading to the design of a hybrid model conscious of the state-of-health to make prediction. The experiments show that the model has high voltage predictive accuracy throughout a LiB's cycle life.

Read more

8/23/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Adaptive Bayesian Optimization for High-Precision Motion Systems

Christopher Konig, Raamadaas Krishnadas, Efe C. Balta, Alisa Rupenyan

Controller tuning and parameter optimization are crucial in system design to improve closed-loop system performance. Bayesian optimization has been established as an efficient model-free controller tuning and adaptation method. However, Bayesian optimization methods are computationally expensive and therefore difficult to use in real-time critical scenarios. In this work, we propose a real-time purely data-driven, model-free approach for adaptive control, by online tuning low-level controller parameters. We base our algorithm on GoOSE, an algorithm for safe and sample-efficient Bayesian optimization, for handling performance and stability criteria. We introduce multiple computational and algorithmic modifications for computational efficiency and parallelization of optimization steps. We further evaluate the algorithm's performance on a real precision-motion system utilized in semiconductor industry applications by modifying the payload and reference stepsize and comparing it to an interpolated constrained optimization-based baseline approach.

Read more

4/24/2024