Bayesian optimization for stable properties amid processing fluctuations in sputter deposition

Read original: arXiv:2405.03092 - Published 5/7/2024 by Ankit Shrivastava, Matias Kalaswad, Joyce O. Custer, David P. Adams, Habib N. Najm
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers introduce a Bayesian optimization approach to guide the sputter deposition of molybdenum thin films
  • The goal is to achieve desired residual stress and sheet resistance while minimizing susceptibility to stochastic fluctuations during deposition
  • Thin films are critical in many technologies, and their properties are influenced by deposition parameters like power, pressure, and distance
  • Exploring the parameter space to optimize these properties is expensive, so Bayesian optimization is an ideal solution

Plain English Explanation

Thin films are ultra-thin layers of material used in many high-tech devices like semiconductors and optical equipment. The physical properties of these films, such as the internal stress and electrical resistance, are crucial for the devices to function properly. However, the process used to deposit these films, called sputtering, has many variables that can affect these properties in unpredictable ways.

The researchers in this study wanted to find the optimal settings for the sputtering process to get the desired stress and resistance levels, while also ensuring the films are consistent and reliable despite the inherent randomness in the deposition process. To do this, they used a technique called Bayesian optimization. This is a smart way to explore the many possible combinations of sputtering parameters, like power and pressure, to quickly zero in on the best settings without having to test every possible combination.

The key insight is that Bayesian optimization can efficiently search this complex, multidimensional "design space" without relying on detailed mathematical models of how the variables influence the film properties. Instead, it builds a statistical model of the relationship based on the limited experimental data, and then intelligently chooses the next set of parameters to test in order to home in on the optimal settings.

By incorporating prior knowledge about how the film stress varies with pressure, the researchers were able to further guide the optimization process to find parameter combinations that produced films least affected by random fluctuations during deposition. This helps ensure the reliability and consistency of the final thin film properties.

Technical Explanation

The researchers utilized Bayesian optimization to guide the sputter deposition of molybdenum thin films. Bayesian optimization is well-suited for optimizing the inputs/parameters of general "black-box" functions, like the relationship between deposition parameters and thin film properties, without requiring gradient information.

The team developed a custom objective function that incorporated observed data on the residual stress and sheet resistance of the deposited films. They also integrated prior knowledge about how stress varies with pressure into the objective function, in order to prioritize films least affected by stochastic fluctuations during deposition.

By iteratively updating a statistical model of the objective function based on the experimental data, the Bayesian optimization approach was able to efficiently explore the multi-dimensional design space of deposition power and pressure. This allowed the researchers to identify optimal parameter combinations that met their desired specifications for stress and resistance, while also ensuring the consistency and reliability of the thin film properties.

The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of Bayesian optimization in identifying the best process parameters for sputter deposition, without requiring an exhaustive exploration of the full design space. This variational Bayesian surrogate modeling approach can be applied more broadly to other thin film deposition techniques and material systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough demonstration of using Bayesian optimization to guide the sputter deposition of molybdenum thin films. The researchers thoughtfully incorporated prior knowledge of the stress-pressure relationship into their objective function, which likely improved the efficiency and effectiveness of the optimization process.

However, the paper does not provide much detail on the specific experimental setup, materials, and measurement techniques used. This makes it difficult to fully assess the validity and generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the paper does not discuss any potential limitations or caveats of the Bayesian optimization approach in this context.

For example, it's unclear how sensitive the optimal parameter combinations are to factors like target material composition, substrate properties, or deposition system geometry. Further research may be needed to understand the robustness of this approach across a wider range of thin film deposition scenarios.

Additionally, the paper does not compare the Bayesian optimization results to other optimization techniques, such as gradient-based methods or design of experiments approaches. This would help contextualize the relative strengths and weaknesses of the proposed methodology.

Overall, the paper demonstrates a promising application of Bayesian optimization for thin film deposition process control. However, additional work is needed to fully characterize the capabilities and limitations of this approach, as well as explore its potential for broader use in materials science and manufacturing.

Conclusion

This study presents a Bayesian optimization framework for guiding the sputter deposition of molybdenum thin films to achieve desired residual stress and sheet resistance, while also minimizing susceptibility to stochastic fluctuations during the deposition process.

By efficiently exploring the multi-dimensional parameter space of deposition power and pressure, the Bayesian optimization approach was able to identify optimal settings that met the researchers' targeted specifications for the thin film properties. Incorporating prior knowledge about the stress-pressure relationship further enhanced the optimization process.

The findings highlight the potential of Bayesian optimization techniques for materials science and manufacturing applications where complex relationships between process variables and product attributes need to be navigated. This adaptive approach to thin film deposition process control could lead to improved device performance and reliability across a range of high-tech industries.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Bayesian optimization for stable properties amid processing fluctuations in sputter deposition

Ankit Shrivastava, Matias Kalaswad, Joyce O. Custer, David P. Adams, Habib N. Najm

We introduce a Bayesian optimization approach to guide the sputter deposition of molybdenum thin films, aiming to achieve desired residual stress and sheet resistance while minimizing susceptibility to stochastic fluctuations during deposition. Thin films are pivotal in numerous technologies, including semiconductors and optical devices, where their properties are critical. Sputter deposition parameters, such as deposition power, vacuum chamber pressure, and working distance, influence physical properties like residual stress and resistance. Excessive stress and high resistance can impair device performance, necessitating the selection of optimal process parameters. Furthermore, these parameters should ensure the consistency and reliability of thin film properties, assisting in the reproducibility of the devices. However, exploring the multidimensional design space for process optimization is expensive. Bayesian optimization is ideal for optimizing inputs/parameters of general black-box functions without reliance on gradient information. We utilize Bayesian optimization to optimize deposition power and pressure using a custom-built objective function incorporating observed stress and resistance data. Additionally, we integrate prior knowledge of stress variation with pressure into the objective function to prioritize films least affected by stochastic variations. Our findings demonstrate that Bayesian optimization effectively explores the design space and identifies optimal parameter combinations meeting desired stress and resistance specifications.

Read more

5/7/2024

Parameter Identification for Electrochemical Models of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Bayesian Optimization
Total Score

0

Parameter Identification for Electrochemical Models of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Bayesian Optimization

Jianzong Pi, Samuel Filgueira da Silva, Mehmet Fatih Ozkan, Abhishek Gupta, Marcello Canova

Efficient parameter identification of electrochemical models is crucial for accurate monitoring and control of lithium-ion cells. This process becomes challenging when applied to complex models that rely on a considerable number of interdependent parameters that affect the output response. Gradient-based and metaheuristic optimization techniques, although previously employed for this task, are limited by their lack of robustness, high computational costs, and susceptibility to local minima. In this study, Bayesian Optimization is used for tuning the dynamic parameters of an electrochemical equivalent circuit battery model (E-ECM) for a nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC)-graphite cell. The performance of the Bayesian Optimization is compared with baseline methods based on gradient-based and metaheuristic approaches. The robustness of the parameter optimization method is tested by performing verification using an experimental drive cycle. The results indicate that Bayesian Optimization outperforms Gradient Descent and PSO optimization techniques, achieving reductions on average testing loss by 28.8% and 5.8%, respectively. Moreover, Bayesian optimization significantly reduces the variance in testing loss by 95.8% and 72.7%, respectively.

Read more

5/20/2024

Bayesian optimization of atomic structures with prior probabilities from universal interatomic potentials
Total Score

0

Bayesian optimization of atomic structures with prior probabilities from universal interatomic potentials

Peder Lyngby, Casper Larsen, Karsten Wedel Jacobsen

The optimization of atomic structures plays a pivotal role in understanding and designing materials with desired properties. However, conventional methods often struggle with the formidable task of navigating the vast potential energy surface, especially in high-dimensional spaces with numerous local minima. Recent advancements in machine learning-driven surrogate models offer a promising avenue for alleviating this computational burden. In this study, we propose a novel approach that combines the strengths of universal machine learning potentials with a Bayesian approach of the GOFEE/BEACON framework. By leveraging the comprehensive chemical knowledge encoded in pretrained universal machine learning potentials as a prior estimate of energy and forces, we enable the Gaussian process to focus solely on capturing the intricate nuances of the potential energy surface. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through comparative analyses across diverse systems, including periodic bulk materials, surface structures, and a cluster.

Read more

8/29/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Physics-based material parameters extraction from perovskite experiments via Bayesian optimization

Hualin Zhan, Viqar Ahmad, Azul Mayon, Grace Tabi, Anh Dinh Bui, Zhuofeng Li, Daniel Walter, Hieu Nguyen, Klaus Weber, Thomas White, Kylie Catchpole

The ability to extract material parameters of perovskite from quantitative experimental analysis is essential for rational design of photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications. However, the difficulty of this analysis increases significantly with the complexity of the theoretical model and the number of material parameters for perovskite. Here we use Bayesian optimization to develop an analysis platform that can extract up to 8 fundamental material parameters of an organometallic perovskite semiconductor from a transient photoluminescence experiment, based on a complex full physics model that includes drift-diffusion of carriers and dynamic defect occupation. An example study of thermal degradation reveals that the carrier mobility and trap-assisted recombination coefficient are reduced noticeably, while the defect energy level remains nearly unchanged. The reduced carrier mobility can dominate the overall effect on thermal degradation of perovskite solar cells by reducing the fill factor, despite the opposite effect of the reduced trap-assisted recombination coefficient on increasing the fill factor. In future, this platform can be conveniently applied to other experiments or to combinations of experiments, accelerating materials discovery and optimization of semiconductor materials for photovoltaics and other applications.

Read more

5/30/2024