Partial-Label Learning with a Reject Option
2402.00592
0
0
🖼️
Abstract
In real-world applications, one often encounters ambiguously labeled data, where different annotators assign conflicting class labels. Partial-label learning allows training classifiers in this weakly supervised setting, where state-of-the-art methods already show good predictive performance. However, even the best algorithms give incorrect predictions, which can have severe consequences when they impact actions or decisions. We propose a novel risk-consistent partial-label learning algorithm with a reject option, that is, the algorithm can reject unsure predictions. Extensive experiments on artificial and real-world datasets show that our method provides the best trade-off between the number and accuracy of non-rejected predictions when compared to our competitors, which use confidence thresholds for rejecting unsure predictions instead. When evaluated without the reject option, our nearest neighbor-based approach also achieves competitive prediction performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- In real-world applications, data can have ambiguous or conflicting labels assigned by different annotators
- Partial-label learning allows training classifiers in this weakly supervised setting, with good predictive performance
- However, even the best algorithms can make incorrect predictions, which can have severe consequences
- This paper proposes a novel partial-label learning algorithm with a reject option, allowing the algorithm to reject unsure predictions
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world situations, the data we have to work with can be messy and unclear. Sometimes, different people who are tasked with labeling or categorizing the data will disagree with each other, leading to ambiguous or conflicting labels. This can make it challenging to train accurate machine learning models.
Partial-label learning is a approach that allows us to train classifiers even when the data has these kinds of issues. The current state-of-the-art partial-label learning methods already do a pretty good job at making accurate predictions.
However, even the best algorithms can still make mistakes sometimes. And when these mistakes happen in applications that impact real-world actions or decisions, the consequences can be severe. To address this, the researchers propose a new partial-label learning algorithm that has the ability to reject predictions when it's not confident about the answer. This allows the algorithm to avoid making risky guesses and instead focus on only providing predictions it's sure about.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel risk-consistent partial-label learning algorithm with a reject option. This means the algorithm can choose to abstain from making a prediction if it's not confident enough about the answer.
The researchers evaluated their approach on both artificial and real-world datasets, and found that it provides the best trade-off between the number of predictions made and the accuracy of those non-rejected predictions, compared to existing methods that use confidence thresholds for rejection.
When evaluated without the reject option, their nearest neighbor-based approach also achieved competitive predictive performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that even the best partial-label learning algorithms can still make incorrect predictions, which can have serious consequences in real-world applications. The proposed reject option is a sensible way to address this issue, as it allows the algorithm to avoid making risky guesses and focus only on providing predictions it's highly confident about.
That said, the decision of when to reject a prediction versus making a possibly inaccurate guess is a tricky balance to strike. The paper shows that their approach finds a good trade-off, but there may still be room for improvement, especially as the algorithm is applied to more diverse real-world scenarios.
Additionally, the authors note that their method relies on a nearest neighbor-based approach, which may have limitations in terms of scalability or handling high-dimensional data. Exploring alternative architectures or techniques could be an area for future research.
Overall, this paper presents a thoughtful and innovative solution to an important problem in partial-label learning, and the reject option concept could have broader applicability beyond just this specific domain.
Conclusion
This paper addresses a crucial issue in real-world machine learning applications, where even state-of-the-art methods can make mistakes that have severe consequences. By proposing a partial-label learning algorithm with a reject option, the researchers have developed a way to avoid making risky guesses and instead focus on providing only the most confident and accurate predictions.
The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, and the reject option concept could potentially be applied to other machine learning tasks beyond just partial-label learning. As the field continues to tackle increasingly complex and high-stakes applications, techniques like this that prioritize safety and reliability will become ever more important.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Combining Supervised Learning and Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Label Classification Tasks with Partial Labels
Zixia Jia, Junpeng Li, Shichuan Zhang, Anji Liu, Zilong Zheng
0
0
Traditional supervised learning heavily relies on human-annotated datasets, especially in data-hungry neural approaches. However, various tasks, especially multi-label tasks like document-level relation extraction, pose challenges in fully manual annotation due to the specific domain knowledge and large class sets. Therefore, we address the multi-label positive-unlabelled learning (MLPUL) problem, where only a subset of positive classes is annotated. We propose Mixture Learner for Partially Annotated Classification (MLPAC), an RL-based framework combining the exploration ability of reinforcement learning and the exploitation ability of supervised learning. Experimental results across various tasks, including document-level relation extraction, multi-label image classification, and binary PU learning, demonstrate the generalization and effectiveness of our framework.
6/26/2024
🎲
Semi-supervised Contrastive Learning Using Partial Label Information
Colin B. Hansen, Vishwesh Nath, Diego A. Mesa, Yuankai Huo, Bennett A. Landman, Thomas A. Lasko
0
0
In semi-supervised learning, information from unlabeled examples is used to improve the model learned from labeled examples. In some learning problems, partial label information can be inferred from otherwise unlabeled examples and used to further improve the model. In particular, partial label information exists when subsets of training examples are known to have the same label, even though the label itself is missing. By encouraging the model to give the same label to all such examples through contrastive learning objectives, we can potentially improve its performance. We call this encouragement Nullspace Tuning because the difference vector between any pair of examples with the same label should lie in the nullspace of a linear model. In this paper, we investigate the benefit of using partial label information using a careful comparison framework over well-characterized public datasets. We show that the additional information provided by partial labels reduces test error over good semi-supervised methods usually by a factor of 2, up to a factor of 5.5 in the best case. We also show that adding Nullspace Tuning to the newer and state-of-the-art MixMatch method decreases its test error by up to a factor of 1.8.
6/4/2024
🌿
Pseudo-labelling meets Label Smoothing for Noisy Partial Label Learning
Darshana Saravanan, Naresh Manwani, Vineet Gandhi
0
0
Partial label learning (PLL) is a weakly-supervised learning paradigm where each training instance is paired with a set of candidate labels (partial label), one of which is the true label. Noisy PLL (NPLL) relaxes this constraint by allowing some partial labels to not contain the true label, enhancing the practicality of the problem. Our work centres on NPLL and presents a minimalistic framework that initially assigns pseudo-labels to images by exploiting the noisy partial labels through a weighted nearest neighbour algorithm. These pseudo-label and image pairs are then used to train a deep neural network classifier with label smoothing. The classifier's features and predictions are subsequently employed to refine and enhance the accuracy of pseudo-labels. We perform thorough experiments on seven datasets and compare against nine NPLL and PLL methods. We achieve state-of-the-art results in all studied settings from the prior literature, obtaining substantial gains in fine-grained classification and extreme noise scenarios. Further, we show the promising generalisation capability of our framework in realistic crowd-sourced datasets.
5/29/2024
When No-Rejection Learning is Consistent for Regression with Rejection
Xiaocheng Li, Shang Liu, Chunlin Sun, Hanzhao Wang
0
0
Learning with rejection has been a prototypical model for studying the human-AI interaction on prediction tasks. Upon the arrival of a sample instance, the model first uses a rejector to decide whether to accept and use the AI predictor to make a prediction or reject and defer the sample to humans. Learning such a model changes the structure of the original loss function and often results in undesirable non-convexity and inconsistency issues. For the classification with rejection problem, several works develop consistent surrogate losses for the joint learning of the predictor and the rejector, while there have been fewer works for the regression counterpart. This paper studies the regression with rejection (RwR) problem and investigates a no-rejection learning strategy that uses all the data to learn the predictor. We first establish the consistency for such a strategy under the weak realizability condition. Then for the case without the weak realizability, we show that the excessive risk can also be upper bounded with the sum of two parts: prediction error and calibration error. Lastly, we demonstrate the advantage of such a proposed learning strategy with empirical evidence.
4/23/2024