Semi-supervised Contrastive Learning Using Partial Label Information
2003.07921
0
0
🎲
Abstract
In semi-supervised learning, information from unlabeled examples is used to improve the model learned from labeled examples. In some learning problems, partial label information can be inferred from otherwise unlabeled examples and used to further improve the model. In particular, partial label information exists when subsets of training examples are known to have the same label, even though the label itself is missing. By encouraging the model to give the same label to all such examples through contrastive learning objectives, we can potentially improve its performance. We call this encouragement Nullspace Tuning because the difference vector between any pair of examples with the same label should lie in the nullspace of a linear model. In this paper, we investigate the benefit of using partial label information using a careful comparison framework over well-characterized public datasets. We show that the additional information provided by partial labels reduces test error over good semi-supervised methods usually by a factor of 2, up to a factor of 5.5 in the best case. We also show that adding Nullspace Tuning to the newer and state-of-the-art MixMatch method decreases its test error by up to a factor of 1.8.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- In semi-supervised learning, information from unlabeled examples is used to improve models trained on labeled data.
- Partial label information can be inferred from otherwise unlabeled examples and used to further improve the model.
- Partial label information exists when subsets of training examples are known to have the same label, even though the specific label is missing.
- By encouraging the model to give the same label to all such examples through contrastive learning objectives, the model's performance can be improved.
- This approach is called "Nullspace Tuning" because the difference vector between any pair of examples with the same label should lie in the nullspace of a linear model.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are usually trained on labeled data, where each example has a known classification or output. However, sometimes it's difficult or expensive to get fully labeled data. Semi-supervised learning is a technique that can use unlabeled data, in addition to the labeled data, to improve the model's performance.
In this paper, the researchers looked at a specific type of semi-supervised learning called "partial label information." This happens when you know that some examples in the unlabeled data have the same label, even though you don't know what that label is. For example, you might have a set of images and know that 5 of them show dogs, even if you don't know which specific dog breed is in each image.
The key insight is that by encouraging the model to give the same label to all examples with the same partial label information, you can improve its overall performance. The researchers call this "Nullspace Tuning" because the difference between the model's predictions for examples with the same label should be in the "nullspace" - the space where the model's linear weights have no effect.
By incorporating this partial label information, the researchers were able to significantly reduce the test error of the machine learning models, in some cases by as much as 5.5 times compared to good semi-supervised methods. They also showed that adding Nullspace Tuning to a state-of-the-art semi-supervised method called MixMatch could further reduce its test error by up to 1.8 times.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the benefits of using partial label information to improve semi-supervised learning. Partial label information exists when subsets of training examples are known to have the same label, even though the specific label is unknown.
The researchers proposed an approach called "Nullspace Tuning" that encourages the model to give the same label to all examples with the same partial label information. This is achieved by adding a contrastive learning objective that penalizes the model when the difference vector between any pair of examples with the same partial label is not in the nullspace of the model's linear weights.
Through a careful comparison framework over well-characterized public datasets, the researchers showed that the additional information provided by partial labels can significantly reduce test error over good semi-supervised methods, often by a factor of 2, and up to a factor of 5.5 in the best case.
Furthermore, they demonstrated that adding Nullspace Tuning to the newer and state-of-the-art MixMatch method decreases its test error by up to a factor of 1.8. This suggests that Nullspace Tuning can be a powerful technique for improving the performance of semi-supervised learning algorithms, especially when partial label information is available.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough investigation of the benefits of using partial label information in semi-supervised learning, and the proposed Nullspace Tuning approach seems to be a promising technique for leveraging this type of information.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses on well-characterized public datasets, which may not fully represent the diversity of real-world learning problems. It would be interesting to see how the Nullspace Tuning approach performs on more complex or domain-specific datasets, and whether there are any challenges or limitations that arise in those contexts.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the theoretical underpinnings of the Nullspace Tuning approach or provide a rigorous mathematical analysis of its properties. While the empirical results are compelling, a more thorough theoretical understanding of the method could help inform its application and further development.
Finally, the paper does not discuss the potential computational or memory overhead associated with the Nullspace Tuning approach, which could be an important consideration for its practical deployment, especially in resource-constrained environments. Exploring the scalability and efficiency of the method would be a valuable area for future research.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper presents a compelling case for the benefits of using partial label information in semi-supervised learning. The Nullspace Tuning approach offers a practical way to leverage this type of information, leading to significant performance improvements over state-of-the-art semi-supervised methods.
The findings have important implications for a wide range of machine learning applications, where unlabeled data is abundant but obtaining complete label information can be challenging or costly. By incorporating partial label information, researchers and practitioners can potentially develop more accurate and efficient models, with the potential to unlock new capabilities and insights across various domains.
The paper's thorough experimental evaluation and the promising results suggest that the Nullspace Tuning technique is a valuable contribution to the field of semi-supervised learning, and it warrants further investigation and exploration to fully understand its potential and limitations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
Pseudo-labelling meets Label Smoothing for Noisy Partial Label Learning
Darshana Saravanan, Naresh Manwani, Vineet Gandhi
0
0
Partial label learning (PLL) is a weakly-supervised learning paradigm where each training instance is paired with a set of candidate labels (partial label), one of which is the true label. Noisy PLL (NPLL) relaxes this constraint by allowing some partial labels to not contain the true label, enhancing the practicality of the problem. Our work centres on NPLL and presents a minimalistic framework that initially assigns pseudo-labels to images by exploiting the noisy partial labels through a weighted nearest neighbour algorithm. These pseudo-label and image pairs are then used to train a deep neural network classifier with label smoothing. The classifier's features and predictions are subsequently employed to refine and enhance the accuracy of pseudo-labels. We perform thorough experiments on seven datasets and compare against nine NPLL and PLL methods. We achieve state-of-the-art results in all studied settings from the prior literature, obtaining substantial gains in fine-grained classification and extreme noise scenarios. Further, we show the promising generalisation capability of our framework in realistic crowd-sourced datasets.
5/29/2024
🖼️
Partial-Label Learning with a Reject Option
Tobias Fuchs, Florian Kalinke, Klemens Bohm
0
0
In real-world applications, one often encounters ambiguously labeled data, where different annotators assign conflicting class labels. Partial-label learning allows training classifiers in this weakly supervised setting, where state-of-the-art methods already show good predictive performance. However, even the best algorithms give incorrect predictions, which can have severe consequences when they impact actions or decisions. We propose a novel risk-consistent partial-label learning algorithm with a reject option, that is, the algorithm can reject unsure predictions. Extensive experiments on artificial and real-world datasets show that our method provides the best trade-off between the number and accuracy of non-rejected predictions when compared to our competitors, which use confidence thresholds for rejecting unsure predictions instead. When evaluated without the reject option, our nearest neighbor-based approach also achieves competitive prediction performance.
6/6/2024
Combining Supervised Learning and Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Label Classification Tasks with Partial Labels
Zixia Jia, Junpeng Li, Shichuan Zhang, Anji Liu, Zilong Zheng
0
0
Traditional supervised learning heavily relies on human-annotated datasets, especially in data-hungry neural approaches. However, various tasks, especially multi-label tasks like document-level relation extraction, pose challenges in fully manual annotation due to the specific domain knowledge and large class sets. Therefore, we address the multi-label positive-unlabelled learning (MLPUL) problem, where only a subset of positive classes is annotated. We propose Mixture Learner for Partially Annotated Classification (MLPAC), an RL-based framework combining the exploration ability of reinforcement learning and the exploitation ability of supervised learning. Experimental results across various tasks, including document-level relation extraction, multi-label image classification, and binary PU learning, demonstrate the generalization and effectiveness of our framework.
6/26/2024
Pre-Trained Vision-Language Models as Partial Annotators
Qian-Wei Wang, Yuqiu Xie, Letian Zhang, Zimo Liu, Shu-Tao Xia
0
0
Pre-trained vision-language models learn massive data to model unified representations of images and natural languages, which can be widely applied to downstream machine learning tasks. In addition to zero-shot inference, in order to better adapt pre-trained models to the requirements of downstream tasks, people usually use methods such as few-shot or parameter-efficient fine-tuning and knowledge distillation. However, annotating samples is laborious, while a large number of unlabeled samples can be easily obtained. In this paper, we investigate a novel pre-trained annotating - weakly-supervised learning paradigm for pre-trained model application and experiment on image classification tasks. Specifically, based on CLIP, we annotate image samples with multiple prompt templates to obtain multiple candidate labels to form the noisy partial label dataset, and design a collaborative consistency regularization algorithm to solve this problem. Our method simultaneously trains two neural networks, which collaboratively purify training labels for each other and obtain pseudo-labels for self-training, while adopting prototypical similarity alignment and noisy supervised contrastive learning to optimize model representation. In experiments, our method achieves performances far beyond zero-shot inference without introducing additional label information, and outperforms other weakly supervised learning and few-shot fine-tuning methods, and obtains smaller deployed models. Our code is available at: url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Co-Reg-8CF9}.
6/28/2024