Particle Denoising Diffusion Sampler
2402.06320
0
0
β
Abstract
Denoising diffusion models have become ubiquitous for generative modeling. The core idea is to transport the data distribution to a Gaussian by using a diffusion. Approximate samples from the data distribution are then obtained by estimating the time-reversal of this diffusion using score matching ideas. We follow here a similar strategy to sample from unnormalized probability densities and compute their normalizing constants. However, the time-reversed diffusion is here simulated by using an original iterative particle scheme relying on a novel score matching loss. Contrary to standard denoising diffusion models, the resulting Particle Denoising Diffusion Sampler (PDDS) provides asymptotically consistent estimates under mild assumptions. We demonstrate PDDS on multimodal and high dimensional sampling tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Denoising diffusion models have become a popular approach for generative modeling
- The core idea is to transform the data distribution into a Gaussian distribution using a diffusion process
- The paper presents a new method called Particle Denoising Diffusion Sampler (PDDS) for sampling from unnormalized probability distributions
- PDDS uses an iterative particle scheme and a novel score matching loss to simulate the time-reversal of the diffusion process
- Unlike standard denoising diffusion models, PDDS provides asymptotically consistent estimates under mild assumptions
- The method is demonstrated on multimodal and high-dimensional sampling tasks
Plain English Explanation
Denoising diffusion models are a type of generative modeling technique that have become widely used. The basic idea is to start with the real data and gradually add more and more noise to it, creating a sequence of increasingly blurred and distorted versions. Then, the model learns to reverse this process, starting from the noisy versions and progressively removing the noise to reconstruct the original data.
This paper presents a new method called the Particle Denoising Diffusion Sampler (PDDS) that follows a similar strategy, but for the task of sampling from unnormalized probability distributions. Unnormalized distributions are mathematical functions that describe the relative likelihood of different outcomes, but the overall magnitude or "normalization" of the distribution is unknown.
The key innovation in PDDS is the use of an iterative particle-based scheme to simulate the time-reversal of the diffusion process. This differs from standard denoising diffusion models, which typically use a more straightforward score matching approach. The PDDS method provides asymptotically consistent estimates, meaning that as the number of particles increases, the samples generated will converge to the true underlying distribution.
The paper demonstrates PDDS on challenging sampling tasks involving multimodal and high-dimensional probability distributions, showcasing its ability to handle complex, real-world data.
Technical Explanation
The core of the Particle Denoising Diffusion Sampler (PDDS) method is the use of an iterative particle scheme to simulate the time-reversal of the diffusion process. This is in contrast to standard denoising diffusion models, which typically employ a more direct score matching approach.
The PDDS algorithm starts by initializing a set of particles, which represent samples from the unnormalized target distribution. These particles are then iteratively updated using a novel score matching loss function, which encourages the particles to move towards regions of higher probability density. The score matching loss captures the gradient of the log-probability of the target distribution, which guides the particles towards the modes of the distribution.
Unlike standard denoising diffusion models, the PDDS method provides asymptotically consistent estimates under mild assumptions. This means that as the number of particles is increased, the samples generated by PDDS will converge to the true underlying distribution.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of PDDS on a range of multimodal and high-dimensional sampling tasks, including upsampling diffusion probabilistic models. The results show that PDDS is able to generate high-quality samples and provide accurate estimates of the normalization constants for these challenging probability distributions.
Critical Analysis
The Particle Denoising Diffusion Sampler (PDDS) method presented in the paper is a promising approach for sampling from unnormalized probability distributions. The use of an iterative particle scheme to simulate the time-reversal of the diffusion process is a novel and interesting idea, and the authors provide a thorough theoretical analysis of the method's properties.
One potential limitation of PDDS is the computational cost associated with maintaining and updating the particle population. As the number of particles increases, the algorithm may become slower and more resource-intensive. The paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational complexity or scaling behavior of PDDS, which would be helpful for understanding its practical applicability.
Additionally, the paper focuses on demonstrating the effectiveness of PDDS on relatively simple, albeit challenging, sampling tasks. It would be valuable to see how the method performs on more complex, real-world problems, such as those encountered in fields like physics-informed diffusion models or interpreting and improving diffusion models from an optimization perspective.
Overall, the Particle Denoising Diffusion Sampler is a promising contribution to the field of generative modeling and sampling. The authors have presented a novel approach with strong theoretical foundations, and the results on the tasks considered are encouraging. Further research and evaluation on more diverse and challenging problems would help to better understand the strengths and limitations of this method.
Conclusion
The Particle Denoising Diffusion Sampler (PDDS) is a new method for sampling from unnormalized probability distributions, which builds upon the success of denoising diffusion models in generative modeling. The key innovation in PDDS is the use of an iterative particle scheme to simulate the time-reversal of the diffusion process, providing asymptotically consistent estimates under mild assumptions.
This approach represents an interesting advancement in the field of generative modeling and sampling, with potential applications in a wide range of domains, from physics-informed diffusion models to upsampling diffusion probabilistic models. While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of PDDS on challenging sampling tasks, further research is needed to fully understand its strengths, limitations, and practical applicability to real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
βοΈ
To smooth a cloud or to pin it down: Guarantees and Insights on Score Matching in Denoising Diffusion Models
Francisco Vargas, Teodora Reu, Anna Kerekes, Michael M Bronstein
0
0
Denoising diffusion models are a class of generative models which have recently achieved state-of-the-art results across many domains. Gradual noise is added to the data using a diffusion process, which transforms the data distribution into a Gaussian. Samples from the generative model are then obtained by simulating an approximation of the time reversal of this diffusion initialized by Gaussian samples. Recent research has explored adapting diffusion models for sampling and inference tasks. In this paper, we leverage known connections to stochastic control akin to the Follmer drift to extend established neural network approximation results for the Follmer drift to denoising diffusion models and samplers.
6/28/2024
β
Physics-Informed Diffusion Models
Jan-Hendrik Bastek, WaiChing Sun, Dennis M. Kochmann
0
0
Generative models such as denoising diffusion models are quickly advancing their ability to approximate highly complex data distributions. They are also increasingly leveraged in scientific machine learning, where samples from the implied data distribution are expected to adhere to specific governing equations. We present a framework to inform denoising diffusion models of underlying constraints on such generated samples during model training. Our approach improves the alignment of the generated samples with the imposed constraints and significantly outperforms existing methods without affecting inference speed. Additionally, our findings suggest that incorporating such constraints during training provides a natural regularization against overfitting. Our framework is easy to implement and versatile in its applicability for imposing equality and inequality constraints as well as auxiliary optimization objectives.
5/24/2024
π οΈ
Interpreting and Improving Diffusion Models from an Optimization Perspective
Frank Permenter, Chenyang Yuan
0
0
Denoising is intuitively related to projection. Indeed, under the manifold hypothesis, adding random noise is approximately equivalent to orthogonal perturbation. Hence, learning to denoise is approximately learning to project. In this paper, we use this observation to interpret denoising diffusion models as approximate gradient descent applied to the Euclidean distance function. We then provide straight-forward convergence analysis of the DDIM sampler under simple assumptions on the projection error of the denoiser. Finally, we propose a new gradient-estimation sampler, generalizing DDIM using insights from our theoretical results. In as few as 5-10 function evaluations, our sampler achieves state-of-the-art FID scores on pretrained CIFAR-10 and CelebA models and can generate high quality samples on latent diffusion models.
6/4/2024
π
Directly Denoising Diffusion Model
Dan Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Feng Luo
0
0
In this paper, we present the Directly Denoising Diffusion Model (DDDM): a simple and generic approach for generating realistic images with few-step sampling, while multistep sampling is still preserved for better performance. DDDMs require no delicately designed samplers nor distillation on pre-trained distillation models. DDDMs train the diffusion model conditioned on an estimated target that was generated from previous training iterations of its own. To generate images, samples generated from the previous time step are also taken into consideration, guiding the generation process iteratively. We further propose Pseudo-LPIPS, a novel metric loss that is more robust to various values of hyperparameter. Despite its simplicity, the proposed approach can achieve strong performance in benchmark datasets. Our model achieves FID scores of 2.57 and 2.33 on CIFAR-10 in one-step and two-step sampling respectively, surpassing those obtained from GANs and distillation-based models. By extending the sampling to 1000 steps, we further reduce FID score to 1.79, aligning with state-of-the-art methods in the literature. For ImageNet 64x64, our approach stands as a competitive contender against leading models.
6/3/2024