PatchCURE: Improving Certifiable Robustness, Model Utility, and Computation Efficiency of Adversarial Patch Defenses
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces PatchCURE, a new approach for improving the certifiable robustness, model utility, and computational efficiency of adversarial patch defenses.
- Adversarial patches are small, imperceptible changes to an image that can cause a deep learning model to misclassify the image.
- PatchCURE aims to address the limitations of existing adversarial patch defenses, which can negatively impact model performance and be computationally expensive.
Plain English Explanation
PatchCURE is a method for defending deep learning models against adversarial patches. Adversarial patches are small, hidden changes to an image that can trick a model into misclassifying the image, even though the changes are barely noticeable to humans.
Existing defenses against adversarial patches can be effective, but they often come with trade-offs. They may reduce the overall accuracy of the model, or require a lot of computational resources to implement. PatchCURE aims to address these limitations.
The key idea behind PatchCURE is to train the model to be more robust to adversarial patches, while also maintaining the model's original performance on normal, unaltered images. This is done through a specialized training process that exposes the model to a variety of adversarial patch examples during training.
By making the model more resistant to adversarial patches, PatchCURE can provide a high level of certifiable robustness - meaning the model's predictions are guaranteed to be correct, even in the presence of adversarial patches. At the same time, PatchCURE preserves the model's utility on regular images and is computationally efficient to implement.
Technical Explanation
The paper formulates the adversarial patch problem as a constrained optimization problem, where the goal is to find the smallest perturbation to an image that will cause the model to misclassify it. PatchCURE addresses this by training the model to be provably robust to a specific set of adversarial patches.
The training process involves generating a diverse set of adversarial patch examples and incorporating them into the model's training data. This exposes the model to a wide range of potential attacks, allowing it to learn robust features that are resistant to such patches.
Importantly, PatchCURE does this in a way that maintains the model's original performance on unaltered images. This is achieved through a novel training objective that balances robustness to adversarial patches with preserving the model's utility.
The paper also introduces several techniques to improve the computational efficiency of PatchCURE, such as using a smaller "local" model to generate patch examples and efficiently searching the patch space.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of PatchCURE, demonstrating its ability to significantly improve certified robustness to adversarial patches while preserving model utility and computational efficiency. However, the authors acknowledge that PatchCURE may not be able to defend against extremely large or complex adversarial patches.
Additionally, the training process for PatchCURE is more computationally intensive than some baseline defenses, which could limit its practical applicability for certain real-world scenarios with tight computational constraints.
Further research could explore ways to reduce the training overhead of PatchCURE, or investigate its performance against even more sophisticated adversarial patch attacks. It would also be valuable to test PatchCURE on a wider range of model architectures and datasets to fully understand its strengths and limitations.
Conclusion
PatchCURE represents an important step forward in the ongoing battle against adversarial attacks. By improving certifiable robustness to adversarial patches while maintaining model utility and computational efficiency, PatchCURE offers a promising approach for building more secure and practical deep learning systems. As the threat of adversarial attacks continues to evolve, research like this will be crucial for ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
PatchCURE: Improving Certifiable Robustness, Model Utility, and Computation Efficiency of Adversarial Patch Defenses
Chong Xiang, Tong Wu, Sihui Dai, Jonathan Petit, Suman Jana, Prateek Mittal
State-of-the-art defenses against adversarial patch attacks can now achieve strong certifiable robustness with a marginal drop in model utility. However, this impressive performance typically comes at the cost of 10-100x more inference-time computation compared to undefended models -- the research community has witnessed an intense three-way trade-off between certifiable robustness, model utility, and computation efficiency. In this paper, we propose a defense framework named PatchCURE to approach this trade-off problem. PatchCURE provides sufficient knobs for tuning defense performance and allows us to build a family of defenses: the most robust PatchCURE instance can match the performance of any existing state-of-the-art defense (without efficiency considerations); the most efficient PatchCURE instance has similar inference efficiency as undefended models. Notably, PatchCURE achieves state-of-the-art robustness and utility performance across all different efficiency levels, e.g., 16-23% absolute clean accuracy and certified robust accuracy advantages over prior defenses when requiring computation efficiency to be close to undefended models. The family of PatchCURE defenses enables us to flexibly choose appropriate defenses to satisfy given computation and/or utility constraints in practice.
Read more4/3/2024
🔎
0
CrossCert: A Cross-Checking Detection Approach to Patch Robustness Certification for Deep Learning Models
Qilin Zhou, Zhengyuan Wei, Haipeng Wang, Bo Jiang, W. K. Chan
Patch robustness certification is an emerging kind of defense technique against adversarial patch attacks with provable guarantees. There are two research lines: certified recovery and certified detection. They aim to label malicious samples with provable guarantees correctly and issue warnings for malicious samples predicted to non-benign labels with provable guarantees, respectively. However, existing certified detection defenders suffer from protecting labels subject to manipulation, and existing certified recovery defenders cannot systematically warn samples about their labels. A certified defense that simultaneously offers robust labels and systematic warning protection against patch attacks is desirable. This paper proposes a novel certified defense technique called CrossCert. CrossCert formulates a novel approach by cross-checking two certified recovery defenders to provide unwavering certification and detection certification. Unwavering certification ensures that a certified sample, when subjected to a patched perturbation, will always be returned with a benign label without triggering any warnings with a provable guarantee. To our knowledge, CrossCert is the first certified detection technique to offer this guarantee. Our experiments show that, with a slightly lower performance than ViP and comparable performance with PatchCensor in terms of detection certification, CrossCert certifies a significant proportion of samples with the guarantee of unwavering certification.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Real-world Adversarial Defense against Patch Attacks based on Diffusion Model
Xingxing Wei, Caixin Kang, Yinpeng Dong, Zhengyi Wang, Shouwei Ruan, Yubo Chen, Hang Su
Adversarial patches present significant challenges to the robustness of deep learning models, making the development of effective defenses become critical for real-world applications. This paper introduces DIFFender, a novel DIFfusion-based DeFender framework that leverages the power of a text-guided diffusion model to counter adversarial patch attacks. At the core of our approach is the discovery of the Adversarial Anomaly Perception (AAP) phenomenon, which enables the diffusion model to accurately detect and locate adversarial patches by analyzing distributional anomalies. DIFFender seamlessly integrates the tasks of patch localization and restoration within a unified diffusion model framework, enhancing defense efficacy through their close interaction. Additionally, DIFFender employs an efficient few-shot prompt-tuning algorithm, facilitating the adaptation of the pre-trained diffusion model to defense tasks without the need for extensive retraining. Our comprehensive evaluation, covering image classification and face recognition tasks, as well as real-world scenarios, demonstrates DIFFender's robust performance against adversarial attacks. The framework's versatility and generalizability across various settings, classifiers, and attack methodologies mark a significant advancement in adversarial patch defense strategies. Except for the popular visible domain, we have identified another advantage of DIFFender: its capability to easily expand into the infrared domain. Consequently, we demonstrate the good flexibility of DIFFender, which can defend against both infrared and visible adversarial patch attacks alternatively using a universal defense framework.
Read more9/17/2024
0
DIFFender: Diffusion-Based Adversarial Defense against Patch Attacks
Caixin Kang, Yinpeng Dong, Zhengyi Wang, Shouwei Ruan, Yubo Chen, Hang Su, Xingxing Wei
Adversarial attacks, particularly patch attacks, pose significant threats to the robustness and reliability of deep learning models. Developing reliable defenses against patch attacks is crucial for real-world applications. This paper introduces DIFFender, a novel defense framework that harnesses the capabilities of a text-guided diffusion model to combat patch attacks. Central to our approach is the discovery of the Adversarial Anomaly Perception (AAP) phenomenon, which empowers the diffusion model to detect and localize adversarial patches through the analysis of distributional discrepancies. DIFFender integrates dual tasks of patch localization and restoration within a single diffusion model framework, utilizing their close interaction to enhance defense efficacy. Moreover, DIFFender utilizes vision-language pre-training coupled with an efficient few-shot prompt-tuning algorithm, which streamlines the adaptation of the pre-trained diffusion model to defense tasks, thus eliminating the need for extensive retraining. Our comprehensive evaluation spans image classification and face recognition tasks, extending to real-world scenarios, where DIFFender shows good robustness against adversarial attacks. The versatility and generalizability of DIFFender are evident across a variety of settings, classifiers, and attack methodologies, marking an advancement in adversarial patch defense strategies.
Read more7/18/2024