CrossCert: A Cross-Checking Detection Approach to Patch Robustness Certification for Deep Learning Models

Read original: arXiv:2405.07668 - Published 5/14/2024 by Qilin Zhou, Zhengyuan Wei, Haipeng Wang, Bo Jiang, W. K. Chan

🔎

Overview

Patch robustness certification is a new type of defense technique against adversarial patch attacks
It aims to correctly label malicious samples (certified recovery) or warn about labels that may be manipulated (certified detection)
Existing certified detection and recovery methods have limitations, so a new approach called CrossCert is proposed

Plain English Explanation

Adversarial attacks are a type of cyber threat where small, carefully crafted changes to an image can cause an AI model to misclassify it. Patch robustness certification is a way to defend against a specific type of adversarial attack called a "patch attack," where a small patch is added to the image.

The paper describes two main approaches to patch robustness certification:

Certified recovery: Correctly labeling malicious samples even if they've been patched, with a guarantee that the label is correct.
Certified detection: Issuing a warning if a sample is predicted to have a "non-benign" (malicious) label, with a guarantee that the warning is valid.

However, existing methods have limitations - certified detection cannot protect labels from being manipulated, and certified recovery cannot systematically warn about potentially malicious labels.

The new approach called CrossCert tries to address these limitations. It uses a cross-checking mechanism between two certified recovery defenses to provide "unwavering certification" - a guarantee that a certified sample will always be returned with a benign label without any warnings, even if it's been patched. This is the first certified detection technique to offer this level of assurance.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel certified defense technique called CrossCert that aims to provide both robust labels and systematic warning protection against patch attacks.

CrossCert formulates a new approach by cross-checking the outputs of two certified recovery defenders - PatchCure and ViP - to achieve "unwavering certification." This means that a certified sample will always be returned with a benign label without triggering any warnings, even when subjected to a patched perturbation, with a provable guarantee.

The authors' experiments show that while CrossCert has slightly lower performance than ViP in terms of detection certification, it can certify a significant proportion of samples with the guarantee of unwavering certification, which is a novel capability compared to existing certified detection techniques.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising new approach to patch robustness certification, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

The authors note that CrossCert's performance is slightly lower than the state-of-the-art ViP method in terms of detection certification. Improving the overall performance while maintaining the unwavering certification guarantee could be an area for future work.
The paper focuses on patch attacks, but there are other types of adversarial attacks that may require different defense strategies. Extending the CrossCert approach to handle a broader range of adversarial threats could be valuable.
The theoretical guarantees provided by CrossCert rely on the underlying certified recovery defenses (PatchCure and ViP) being secure. Further research could investigate the robustness of these base defenses and the overall security of the CrossCert framework.

Overall, the CrossCert approach represents an important step forward in the field of certified adversarial robustness, and the authors' focus on providing strong, provable guarantees is a valuable contribution.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel certified defense technique called CrossCert that aims to address the limitations of existing certified recovery and certified detection methods for protecting against adversarial patch attacks. CrossCert provides a guarantee of "unwavering certification," ensuring that a certified sample will always be returned with a benign label without triggering any warnings, even when subjected to a patched perturbation.

While CrossCert's performance is slightly lower than the state-of-the-art in some areas, its ability to provide this strong, provable guarantee is a significant advancement in the field of patch robustness certification. As the threat of adversarial attacks continues to grow, techniques like CrossCert will play an increasingly important role in building secure and trustworthy AI systems.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔎

CrossCert: A Cross-Checking Detection Approach to Patch Robustness Certification for Deep Learning Models

Qilin Zhou, Zhengyuan Wei, Haipeng Wang, Bo Jiang, W. K. Chan

Patch robustness certification is an emerging kind of defense technique against adversarial patch attacks with provable guarantees. There are two research lines: certified recovery and certified detection. They aim to label malicious samples with provable guarantees correctly and issue warnings for malicious samples predicted to non-benign labels with provable guarantees, respectively. However, existing certified detection defenders suffer from protecting labels subject to manipulation, and existing certified recovery defenders cannot systematically warn samples about their labels. A certified defense that simultaneously offers robust labels and systematic warning protection against patch attacks is desirable. This paper proposes a novel certified defense technique called CrossCert. CrossCert formulates a novel approach by cross-checking two certified recovery defenders to provide unwavering certification and detection certification. Unwavering certification ensures that a certified sample, when subjected to a patched perturbation, will always be returned with a benign label without triggering any warnings with a provable guarantee. To our knowledge, CrossCert is the first certified detection technique to offer this guarantee. Our experiments show that, with a slightly lower performance than ViP and comparable performance with PatchCensor in terms of detection certification, CrossCert certifies a significant proportion of samples with the guarantee of unwavering certification.

5/14/2024

PatchCURE: Improving Certifiable Robustness, Model Utility, and Computation Efficiency of Adversarial Patch Defenses

Chong Xiang, Tong Wu, Sihui Dai, Jonathan Petit, Suman Jana, Prateek Mittal

State-of-the-art defenses against adversarial patch attacks can now achieve strong certifiable robustness with a marginal drop in model utility. However, this impressive performance typically comes at the cost of 10-100x more inference-time computation compared to undefended models -- the research community has witnessed an intense three-way trade-off between certifiable robustness, model utility, and computation efficiency. In this paper, we propose a defense framework named PatchCURE to approach this trade-off problem. PatchCURE provides sufficient knobs for tuning defense performance and allows us to build a family of defenses: the most robust PatchCURE instance can match the performance of any existing state-of-the-art defense (without efficiency considerations); the most efficient PatchCURE instance has similar inference efficiency as undefended models. Notably, PatchCURE achieves state-of-the-art robustness and utility performance across all different efficiency levels, e.g., 16-23% absolute clean accuracy and certified robust accuracy advantages over prior defenses when requiring computation efficiency to be close to undefended models. The family of PatchCURE defenses enables us to flexibly choose appropriate defenses to satisfy given computation and/or utility constraints in practice.

4/3/2024

🧠

Et Tu Certifications: Robustness Certificates Yield Better Adversarial Examples

Andrew C. Cullen, Shijie Liu, Paul Montague, Sarah M. Erfani, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein

In guaranteeing the absence of adversarial examples in an instance's neighbourhood, certification mechanisms play an important role in demonstrating neural net robustness. In this paper, we ask if these certifications can compromise the very models they help to protect? Our new emph{Certification Aware Attack} exploits certifications to produce computationally efficient norm-minimising adversarial examples $74 %$ more often than comparable attacks, while reducing the median perturbation norm by more than $10%$. While these attacks can be used to assess the tightness of certification bounds, they also highlight that releasing certifications can paradoxically reduce security.

6/13/2024

FullCert: Deterministic End-to-End Certification for Training and Inference of Neural Networks

Tobias Lorenz, Marta Kwiatkowska, Mario Fritz

Modern machine learning models are sensitive to the manipulation of both the training data (poisoning attacks) and inference data (adversarial examples). Recognizing this issue, the community has developed many empirical defenses against both attacks and, more recently, certification methods with provable guarantees against inference-time attacks. However, such guarantees are still largely lacking for training-time attacks. In this work, we present FullCert, the first end-to-end certifier with sound, deterministic bounds, which proves robustness against both training-time and inference-time attacks. We first bound all possible perturbations an adversary can make to the training data under the considered threat model. Using these constraints, we bound the perturbations' influence on the model's parameters. Finally, we bound the impact of these parameter changes on the model's prediction, resulting in joint robustness guarantees against poisoning and adversarial examples. To facilitate this novel certification paradigm, we combine our theoretical work with a new open-source library BoundFlow, which enables model training on bounded datasets. We experimentally demonstrate FullCert's feasibility on two datasets.

9/12/2024