Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Design
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Technical paper that explores the concept of performative prediction in the context of games and mechanism design
- Focuses on how predictions can influence the behavior of the system being predicted, leading to unexpected outcomes
- Proposes a model for predicting collective action and discusses its implications for mechanism design
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines a phenomenon called "performative prediction," where the act of predicting the behavior of a system can actually change the behavior of that system. This is particularly relevant in the context of games and mechanism design, where the predictions made by models can influence the actions of the players.
The researchers propose a model for predicting collective action. This model takes into account how the prediction itself can affect the behavior of the individuals or players in the system. For example, if a model predicts that a certain group will take a certain action, that prediction could influence the actual decisions of the group members, leading to different outcomes than the model originally anticipated.
The implications of this concept are significant for the design of mechanisms - the rules and incentives that govern the behavior of players in a system. Traditional mechanism design assumes that the model's predictions will not change the behavior of the players. However, in a performative setting, the model's predictions can actually alter the players' actions, leading to unintended consequences.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a model for predicting collective action that takes into account the performative nature of the predictions. The model consists of a set of players who each have a utility function that depends on their own actions and the actions of the other players. The researchers assume that the players are rational and will choose their actions to maximize their own utility.
The key element of the model is the "performative prediction function," which maps the players' actions to the prediction of the outcome. This prediction function can then influence the players' choices, leading to a feedback loop between the prediction and the actual behavior of the players.
The paper explores the implications of this model for mechanism design, where the goal is to design rules and incentives that lead to desirable outcomes. The researchers show that in a performative setting, traditional mechanism design approaches may not be effective, as the predictions made by the mechanism can alter the behavior of the players in unexpected ways.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that the proposed model is a simplification of the complex reality of collective action and mechanism design. The researchers note that the model assumes rational players with known utility functions, which may not always be the case in real-world settings.
Additionally, the paper does not address the challenges of actually implementing the performative prediction function in practice. Accurately modeling the feedback loop between prediction and behavior may be highly difficult, especially in dynamic and evolving systems.
Further research may be needed to explore the practical applications of this framework and to understand the potential limitations or unintended consequences of performative prediction in real-world scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper introduces the concept of performative prediction and its implications for games and mechanism design. The proposed model highlights the importance of considering how predictions can influence the behavior of the system being predicted, leading to unexpected outcomes.
The findings in this paper have the potential to inform the design of more robust and effective mechanisms in a variety of domains, from economic policy to social systems. By accounting for the performative nature of predictions, researchers and policymakers may be able to develop approaches that better align with the actual behavior of the participants in the system.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Design
Ant'onio G'ois, Mehrnaz Mofakhami, Fernando P. Santos, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Gauthier Gidel
Predictions often influence the reality which they aim to predict, an effect known as performativity. Existing work focuses on accuracy maximization under this effect, but model deployment may have important unintended impacts, especially in multiagent scenarios. In this work, we investigate performative prediction in a concrete game-theoretic setting where social welfare is an alternative objective to accuracy maximization. We explore a collective risk dilemma scenario where maximising accuracy can negatively impact social welfare, when predicting collective behaviours. By assuming knowledge of a Bayesian agent behavior model, we then show how to achieve better trade-offs and use them for mechanism design.
Read more8/12/2024
🛠️
0
Plug-in Performative Optimization
Licong Lin, Tijana Zrnic
When predictions are performative, the choice of which predictor to deploy influences the distribution of future observations. The overarching goal in learning under performativity is to find a predictor that has low emph{performative risk}, that is, good performance on its induced distribution. One family of solutions for optimizing the performative risk, including bandits and other derivative-free methods, is agnostic to any structure in the performative feedback, leading to exceedingly slow convergence rates. A complementary family of solutions makes use of explicit emph{models} for the feedback, such as best-response models in strategic classification, enabling faster rates. However, these rates critically rely on the feedback model being correct. In this work we study a general protocol for making use of possibly misspecified models in performative prediction, called emph{plug-in performative optimization}. We show this solution can be far superior to model-agnostic strategies, as long as the misspecification is not too extreme. Our results support the hypothesis that models, even if misspecified, can indeed help with learning in performative settings.
Read more5/29/2024
🔮
0
Performative Prediction with Neural Networks
Mehrnaz Mofakhami, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Gauthier Gidel
Performative prediction is a framework for learning models that influence the data they intend to predict. We focus on finding classifiers that are performatively stable, i.e. optimal for the data distribution they induce. Standard convergence results for finding a performatively stable classifier with the method of repeated risk minimization assume that the data distribution is Lipschitz continuous to the model's parameters. Under this assumption, the loss must be strongly convex and smooth in these parameters; otherwise, the method will diverge for some problems. In this work, we instead assume that the data distribution is Lipschitz continuous with respect to the model's predictions, a more natural assumption for performative systems. As a result, we are able to significantly relax the assumptions on the loss function. In particular, we do not need to assume convexity with respect to the model's parameters. As an illustration, we introduce a resampling procedure that models realistic distribution shifts and show that it satisfies our assumptions. We support our theory by showing that one can learn performatively stable classifiers with neural networks making predictions about real data that shift according to our proposed procedure.
Read more8/27/2024
0
Addressing Polarization and Unfairness in Performative Prediction
Kun Jin, Tian Xie, Yang Liu, Xueru Zhang
When machine learning (ML) models are used in applications that involve humans (e.g., online recommendation, school admission, hiring, lending), the model itself may trigger changes in the distribution of targeted data it aims to predict. Performative prediction (PP) is a framework that explicitly considers such model-dependent distribution shifts when learning ML models. While significant efforts have been devoted to finding performative stable (PS) solutions in PP for system robustness, their societal implications are less explored and it is unclear whether PS solutions are aligned with social norms such as fairness. In this paper, we set out to examine the fairness property of PS solutions in performative prediction. We first show that PS solutions can incur severe polarization effects and group-wise loss disparity. Although existing fairness mechanisms commonly used in literature can help mitigate unfairness, they may fail and disrupt the stability under model-dependent distribution shifts. We thus propose novel fairness intervention mechanisms that can simultaneously achieve both stability and fairness in PP settings. Both theoretical analysis and experiments are provided to validate the proposed method.
Read more6/26/2024