Plug-in Performative Optimization

Overview

• When predictions influence the future, the choice of predictor can impact future observations.
• The goal is to find a predictor with low "performative risk" - good performance on the induced distribution.
• Existing solutions either ignore the structure of performative feedback (slow convergence) or rely on exact feedback models (sensitive to model misspecification).

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world situations, our predictions can actually change the future they're meant to forecast. For example, a credit scoring model that denies loans to certain applicants may lead to fewer of those applicants even applying in the future. This creates a feedback loop where the predictor itself influences the data it's trained on.

The challenge is to find a predictor that performs well even under this "performative" setting, where its predictions impact the future distribution of observations. One family of solutions, like bandits and other derivative-free methods, ignore the structure of this performative feedback, leading to slow convergence. Another family uses explicit models of the performative feedback, like in strategic classification, enabling faster convergence, but relying critically on the feedback model being correct.

This paper studies a general approach called "plug-in performative optimization" that can leverage potentially imperfect models of the performative feedback. As long as the model isn't too far off, this approach can outperform model-agnostic strategies, providing evidence that even imperfect models can help with learning in performative settings.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines the problem of "performative prediction," where the choice of predictor influences the distribution of future observations that the predictor will see. The overarching goal is to find a predictor with low "performative risk" - good performance on the induced distribution.

One family of existing solutions, including bandits and other derivative-free methods, is agnostic to the structure of the performative feedback, leading to slow convergence rates. In contrast, a complementary family of solutions makes use of explicit models of the performative feedback, such as best-response models in strategic classification, enabling faster rates. However, these rates critically rely on the feedback model being correct.

This paper proposes a general protocol called "plug-in performative optimization" that can leverage possibly misspecified models of the performative feedback. The key insight is that as long as the misspecification is not too extreme, this approach can be far superior to model-agnostic strategies. The results support the hypothesis that models, even if imperfect, can indeed help with learning in performative settings.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges that the proposed "plug-in performative optimization" approach relies on the assumption that the model of performative feedback is not too misspecified. If the model is severely wrong, the approach may perform worse than model-agnostic strategies. Additionally, the paper does not address how to determine the degree of model misspecification in practice, which could be a challenge in real-world applications.

Furthermore, the paper focuses on the theoretical analysis and does not provide extensive empirical evaluation. Practical case studies demonstrating the performance of the plug-in approach compared to alternatives would strengthen the conclusions and help readers assess its real-world applicability.

It would also be valuable for the authors to discuss potential pitfalls or unintended consequences of deploying predictors in performative settings. For example, decision-focused predictions via pessimistic bilevel optimization can help address the challenge of strategic behavior, which is an important consideration in performative prediction.

Overall, the paper makes a compelling theoretical contribution, but further empirical validation and discussion of practical considerations would enhance the impact and usefulness of the research.

Conclusion

This paper explores a general approach called "plug-in performative optimization" that can leverage potentially imperfect models of the performative feedback - the phenomenon where the choice of predictor influences the future distribution of observations.

The key insight is that as long as the model misspecification is not too extreme, this approach can outperform model-agnostic strategies, providing evidence that even imperfect models can be helpful in learning for performative settings. This is an important step forward, as existing solutions either ignore the structure of performative feedback (leading to slow convergence) or rely on exact feedback models (which are sensitive to misspecification).

While the theoretical analysis is strong, further empirical validation and discussion of practical considerations would strengthen the real-world applicability of this research. Nonetheless, this work represents a valuable contribution to the challenge of making accurate predictions in settings where the predictions themselves can impact the future.