Persistent homology of directed spaces
0
🌿
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the relationship between natural homology and persistent homology in the context of directed spaces, which are a semantic model for concurrent programs.
- Natural homology is an algebraic invariant of directed spaces, while persistent homology is a technique from topological data analysis that extracts topological properties from point-cloud data.
- The authors show that natural homology can be considered a persistence object and can be calculated as a colimit of uni-dimensional persistent homologies along traces.
- The paper suggests further links and avenues for future work in this direction.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at the relationship between two different ways of analyzing the topology, or shape, of directed spaces. Directed spaces are a way of modeling concurrent programs, where the order of events matters.
The first method, called natural homology, is an algebraic tool for studying the properties of directed spaces. The second method, persistent homology, is a way of extracting the topological properties of "point cloud" data, which can be noisy.
The authors show that natural homology can actually be thought of as a type of persistent homology. This means the two approaches are closely related, and insights from one can be used to understand the other.
The paper suggests that exploring these connections further could lead to new ways of analyzing and understanding directed spaces, with applications in areas like social network analysis and interpretable link prediction.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concepts of natural homology and persistent homology. Natural homology is an algebraic invariant of directed spaces, which are a semantic model for concurrent programs. Persistent homology, on the other hand, is a technique from topological data analysis that is used to extract the topological properties of point-cloud data, while filtering out noise.
The authors observe that both natural homology and persistent homology involve tracking the evolution of homological properties through a sequence of inclusions of usual topological spaces. Exploiting this similarity, the authors show that natural homology can be considered a persistence object, and can be calculated as a colimit of uni-dimensional persistent homologies along traces.
The paper then suggests several avenues for future work, including further exploring the links between natural homology and persistent homology, and potentially applying these insights to areas like social network analysis and interpretable link prediction.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents an intriguing connection between two seemingly disparate areas of mathematics and computer science. By showing that natural homology can be viewed as a type of persistent homology, the authors open up new possibilities for understanding and analyzing directed spaces.
One potential limitation of the work is that it is primarily theoretical in nature, and the authors do not provide any concrete examples or applications of their findings. It would be interesting to see how this connection between natural homology and persistent homology could be leveraged in practical scenarios, such as in the analysis of social media networks or in the interpretation of neural network representations.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the similarities between natural homology and persistent homology, but it does not explore potential differences or limitations of this connection. Further research may be needed to understand the precise boundaries and applicability of the authors' insights.
Overall, this paper offers a thought-provoking perspective on the relationship between two important mathematical concepts, and suggests promising avenues for future work in the field of topological data analysis and its applications.
Conclusion
This paper establishes an intriguing connection between natural homology, an algebraic invariant of directed spaces, and persistent homology, a powerful tool from topological data analysis. By showing that natural homology can be viewed as a type of persistent homology, the authors open up new possibilities for understanding and analyzing directed spaces, which are important models for concurrent programs.
The paper's findings suggest that exploring the links between these two approaches could lead to new insights and applications in areas like social network analysis and interpretable machine learning. While the work is primarily theoretical, it lays the groundwork for further research that could have significant practical implications for the field of topological data analysis and its various applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
0
Persistent homology of directed spaces
Cameron Calk, Eric Goubault, Philippe Malbos
In this work, we explore links between natural homology and persistent homology for the classification of directed spaces. The former is an algebraic invariant of directed spaces, a semantic model of concurrent programs. The latter was developed in the context of topological data analysis, in which topological properties of point-cloud data sets are extracted while eliminating noise. In both approaches, the evolution homological properties are tracked through a sequence of inclusions of usual topological spaces. Exploiting this similarity, we show that natural homology may be considered a persistence object, and may be calculated as a colimit of uni-dimensional persistent homologies along traces. Finally, we suggest further links and avenues of future work in this direction.
Read more8/7/2024
🚀
0
On the Expressivity of Persistent Homology in Graph Learning
Rub'en Ballester, Bastian Rieck
Persistent homology, a technique from computational topology, has recently shown strong empirical performance in the context of graph classification. Being able to capture long range graph properties via higher-order topological features, such as cycles of arbitrary length, in combination with multi-scale topological descriptors, has improved predictive performance for data sets with prominent topological structures, such as molecules. At the same time, the theoretical properties of persistent homology have not been formally assessed in this context. This paper intends to bridge the gap between computational topology and graph machine learning by providing a brief introduction to persistent homology in the context of graphs, as well as a theoretical discussion and empirical analysis of its expressivity for graph learning tasks.
Read more6/4/2024
📊
0
Persistent Homology for High-dimensional Data Based on Spectral Methods
Sebastian Damrich, Philipp Berens, Dmitry Kobak
Persistent homology is a popular computational tool for analyzing the topology of point clouds, such as the presence of loops or voids. However, many real-world datasets with low intrinsic dimensionality reside in an ambient space of much higher dimensionality. We show that in this case traditional persistent homology becomes very sensitive to noise and fails to detect the correct topology. The same holds true for existing refinements of persistent homology. As a remedy, we find that spectral distances on the $k$-nearest-neighbor graph of the data, such as diffusion distance and effective resistance, allow to detect the correct topology even in the presence of high-dimensional noise. Moreover, we derive a novel closed-form formula for effective resistance, and describe its relation to diffusion distances. Finally, we apply these methods to high-dimensional single-cell RNA-sequencing data and show that spectral distances allow robust detection of cell cycle loops.
Read more5/9/2024
0
Persistent Homology via Ellipsoids
Sara Kaliv{s}nik, Bastian Rieck, Ana v{Z}egarac
Persistent homology is one of the most popular methods in Topological Data Analysis. An initial step in any analysis with persistent homology involves constructing a nested sequence of simplicial complexes, called a filtration, from a point cloud. There is an abundance of different complexes to choose from, with Rips, Alpha, and witness complexes being popular choices. In this manuscript, we build a different type of a geometrically-informed simplicial complex, called an ellipsoid complex. This complex is based on the idea that ellipsoids aligned with tangent directions better approximate the data compared to conventional (Euclidean) balls centered at sample points that are used in the construction of Rips and Alpha complexes, for instance. We use Principal Component Analysis to estimate tangent spaces directly from samples and present algorithms as well as an implementation for computing ellipsoid barcodes, i.e., topological descriptors based on ellipsoid complexes. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments and compare ellipsoid barcodes with standard Rips barcodes. Our findings indicate that ellipsoid complexes are particularly effective for estimating homology of manifolds and spaces with bottlenecks from samples. In particular, the persistence intervals corresponding to a ground-truth topological feature are longer compared to the intervals obtained when using the Rips complex of the data. Furthermore, ellipsoid barcodes lead to better classification results in sparsely-sampled point clouds. Finally, we demonstrate that ellipsoid barcodes outperform Rips barcodes in classification tasks.
Read more8/22/2024