Personalisation of d'Hondt's algorithm and its use in recommender ecosystems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the personalization of the d'Hondt's algorithm and its application in recommender systems.
- The d'Hondt's algorithm is a voting-based method used to allocate seats in proportional representation electoral systems.
- The researchers propose a personalized version of the d'Hondt's algorithm and demonstrate its use in building diverse and personalized recommender ecosystems.
Plain English Explanation
The d'Hondt's algorithm is a mathematical formula used to determine how seats in a parliament or legislative body should be allocated based on the votes cast by the public. Traditionally, this algorithm has been used in political elections, but the researchers in this paper have found a way to adapt it for use in recommender systems.
Recommender systems are the algorithms that power the personalized suggestions we see on various online platforms, such as movie or product recommendations. The researchers propose a personalized version of the d'Hondt's algorithm that can be used to create a more diverse and tailored set of recommendations for each individual user.
Instead of simply ranking items based on popularity or similarity to a user's past preferences, the personalized d'Hondt's algorithm takes into account a user's unique interests and preferences to generate a portfolio of recommendations that better reflects their individual tastes. This can help users discover new and diverse content that they may not have otherwise encountered.
The researchers argue that this approach can lead to more engaging and satisfying experiences for users, as well as potential benefits for the platforms and content creators that rely on recommender systems to connect users with relevant content.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a personalized version of the d'Hondt's algorithm and demonstrates its use in building diverse and personalized recommender ecosystems. The d'Hondt's algorithm is a voting-based method commonly used to allocate seats in proportional representation electoral systems.
The researchers propose adapting this algorithm for use in recommender systems, where the "seats" to be allocated correspond to the recommendations presented to each user. By incorporating user-specific preferences and interests into the allocation process, the personalized d'Hondt's algorithm can generate a more diverse portfolio of recommendations that better reflects each individual's unique tastes.
The paper presents a detailed mathematical formulation of the personalized d'Hondt's algorithm, including the objective function and constraints. The researchers also describe the experimental setup used to evaluate the performance of their approach, which involves comparing the diversity and personalization of recommendations generated by the personalized d'Hondt's algorithm against those from traditional recommender systems.
The results of the experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the personalized d'Hondt's algorithm in generating diverse and personalized recommendations, with improvements in metrics such as [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/what-are-we-optimizing-human-centric-evaluation] and [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/how-to-diversify-any-personalized-recommender-user]. The researchers also discuss the potential benefits of their approach for both users and platform providers, as well as the broader implications for the design of recommender ecosystems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and intriguing approach to personalizing recommender systems by adapting the d'Hondt's algorithm, a well-established method from the field of electoral systems. The researchers provide a thorough technical explanation and rigorous experimental evaluation of their proposed method.
One potential limitation of the approach is the reliance on user-specific preferences and interests as the primary input to the personalized d'Hondt's algorithm. While this can lead to more tailored recommendations, it may also introduce bias and limit the discovery of new and unexpected content that falls outside a user's known interests. [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/rethinking-recommender-systems-cluster-based-algorithm-selection]
Additionally, the paper does not address potential privacy and fairness concerns that may arise from the personalization of recommender systems. [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/privacy-preserving-recommender-system-using-data-collaboration] [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/rlhf-from-heterogeneous-feedback-via-personalization-preference] Further research may be needed to ensure that the personalized d'Hondt's algorithm does not exacerbate existing biases or lead to the exclusion of certain user groups.
Overall, the paper presents a promising approach to improving the diversity and personalization of recommender systems, but additional research may be needed to address potential limitations and ensure the ethical and responsible deployment of such systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a personalized version of the d'Hondt's algorithm and demonstrates its use in building diverse and personalized recommender ecosystems. By adapting a well-established voting-based method from the field of electoral systems, the researchers have developed a novel approach to generating tailored recommendations that better reflect each individual user's unique interests and preferences.
The technical evaluation of the proposed method shows promising results in terms of improving the diversity and personalization of recommendations, with potential benefits for both users and platform providers. However, the paper also highlights the need to consider potential limitations and concerns, such as the risk of biased recommendations and the importance of ensuring the ethical and responsible deployment of such personalized systems.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to create more engaging and user-centric recommender ecosystems, and the personalized d'Hondt's algorithm may serve as a valuable tool for developers and researchers working in this space.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Personalisation of d'Hondt's algorithm and its use in recommender ecosystems
Stepan Balcar, Ladislav Peska, Peter Vojtas
In the area of recommender systems, we are dealing with aggregations and potential of personalisation in ecosystems. Personalisation is based on separate aggregation models for each user. This approach reveals differences in user preferences, especially when they are in strict disagreement with global preferences. Hybrid models are based on combination of global and personalised model of weights for d'Hondt's voting algorithm. This paper shows that personalisation combined with hybridisation on case-by-case basis outperforms non-personalised d'Hondt's algorithm on datasets RetailRocket and SLANTour. By taking into account voices of minorities we achieved better click through rate.
Read more6/12/2024
0
How to Diversify any Personalized Recommender? A User-centric Pre-processing approach
Manel Slokom, Laura Hollink
In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to improve the diversity of Top-N recommendations while maintaining recommendation performance. Our approach employs a user-centric pre-processing strategy aimed at exposing users to a wide array of content categories and topics. We personalize this strategy by selectively adding and removing a percentage of interactions from user profiles. This personalization ensures we remain closely aligned with user preferences while gradually introducing distribution shifts. Our pre-processing technique offers flexibility and can seamlessly integrate into any recommender architecture. To evaluate our approach, we run extensive experiments on two publicly available data sets for news and book recommendations. We test various standard and neural network-based recommender system algorithms. Our results show that our approach generates diverse recommendations, ensuring users are exposed to a wider range of items. Furthermore, leveraging pre-processed data for training leads to recommender systems achieving performance levels comparable to, and in some cases, better than those trained on original, unmodified data. Additionally, our approach promotes provider fairness by facilitating exposure to minority or niche categories.
Read more5/6/2024
0
Learning k-Determinantal Point Processes for Personalized Ranking
Yuli Liu, Christian Walder, Lexing Xie
The key to personalized recommendation is to predict a personalized ranking on a catalog of items by modeling the user's preferences. There are many personalized ranking approaches for item recommendation from implicit feedback like Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) and listwise ranking. Despite these methods have shown performance benefits, there are still limitations affecting recommendation performance. First, none of them directly optimize ranking of sets, causing inadequate exploitation of correlations among multiple items. Second, the diversity aspect of recommendations is insufficiently addressed compared to relevance. In this work, we present a new optimization criterion LkP based on set probability comparison for personalized ranking that moves beyond traditional ranking-based methods. It formalizes set-level relevance and diversity ranking comparisons through a Determinantal Point Process (DPP) kernel decomposition. To confer ranking interpretability to the DPP set probabilities and prioritize the practicality of LkP, we condition the standard DPP on the cardinality k of the DPP-distributed set, known as k-DPP, a less-explored extension of DPP. The generic stochastic gradient descent based technique can be directly applied to optimizing models that employ LkP. We implement LkP in the context of both Matrix Factorization (MF) and neural networks approaches, on three real-world datasets, obtaining improved relevance and diversity performances. LkP is broadly applicable, and when applied to existing recommendation models it also yields strong performance improvements, suggesting that LkP holds significant value to the field of recommender systems.
Read more6/26/2024
🎯
0
Predictive accuracy of recommender algorithms
William Noffsinger
Recommender systems present a customized list of items based upon user or item characteristics with the objective of reducing a large number of possible choices to a smaller ranked set most likely to appeal to the user. A variety of algorithms for recommender systems have been developed and refined including applications of deep learning neural networks. Recent research reports point to a need to perform carefully controlled experiments to gain insights about the relative accuracy of different recommender algorithms, because studies evaluating different methods have not used a common set of benchmark data sets, baseline models, and evaluation metrics. This investigation used publicly available sources of ratings data with a suite of three conventional recommender algorithms and two deep learning (DL) algorithms in controlled experiments to assess their comparative accuracy. Results for the non-DL algorithms conformed well to published results and benchmarks. The two DL algorithms did not perform as well and illuminated known challenges implementing DL recommender algorithms as reported in the literature. Model overfitting is discussed as a potential explanation for the weaker performance of the DL algorithms and several regularization strategies are reviewed as possible approaches to improve predictive error. Findings justify the need for further research in the use of deep learning models for recommender systems.
Read more7/2/2024