Phylogeny-Informed Interaction Estimation Accelerates Co-Evolutionary Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a template for the ALIFE2024 conference, providing a structure and guidance for authors to follow when submitting their research papers.
- The template covers key sections such as Introduction, Related Work, Methods, and Conclusion, ensuring a consistent format and organization across submissions.
- By standardizing the paper structure, the template aims to facilitate the review process and improve the overall quality and readability of the published work.
Plain English Explanation
The provided paper is a template for the ALIFE2024 conference, which is a venue for researchers to present their work in the field of artificial life. The template outlines the structure and content that authors should follow when writing their research papers for submission to the conference.
The template includes several key sections, such as the Introduction, which gives an overview of the research topic and its importance. The Related Work section covers previous studies and findings in the same or related areas, providing context for the current research.
The Methods section is where the authors describe the techniques and approaches they used in their study, such as the experimental design, data collection, and analysis procedures. This section helps readers understand how the research was conducted and the reasoning behind the chosen methods.
The Conclusion section summarizes the key findings and their implications, as well as any limitations or future research directions. This helps readers quickly grasp the significance of the study and its potential impact on the field.
By using a standardized template, the ALIFE2024 conference aims to ensure a consistent format for all submitted papers, making it easier for reviewers to compare and evaluate the research. This also helps readers navigate the published work more efficiently, as they can expect to find the same structure and content across different papers.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a template for submissions to the ALIFE2024 conference, which is designed to provide a consistent format and structure for research papers in the field of artificial life. The template includes the following main sections:
-
Introduction: This section gives an overview of the research topic, its importance, and the objectives of the study.
-
Related Work: This section covers previous research and findings in the same or related areas, providing context for the current study.
-
- Defining Distances: This subsection describes the techniques and approaches used in the research, such as the experimental design, data collection, and analysis procedures.
- Additional subsections may be added as needed to cover other aspects of the methodology.
-
Conclusion: This section summarizes the key findings, their implications, and any limitations or future research directions.
The template includes formatting guidelines and recommended content for each section, ensuring a consistent structure across all submissions. This standardization aims to facilitate the review process and improve the overall quality and readability of the published work.
Critical Analysis
The ALIFE2024 template provides a clear and well-structured approach for authors to follow when preparing their research papers for submission. By standardizing the format and content, the template helps to ensure a consistent level of quality and organization across the published work.
One potential limitation of the template is that it may not be flexible enough to accommodate all types of research in the field of artificial life. While the core sections (Introduction, Related Work, Methods, and Conclusion) are widely applicable, there may be unique aspects of certain studies that do not fit neatly into the provided structure. It would be beneficial to allow for some degree of customization or additional sections to ensure that authors can effectively present their research.
Additionally, the template does not explicitly address the need for open science practices, such as data and code sharing. Encouraging or even requiring authors to make their research materials publicly available could significantly improve the transparency and reproducibility of the published work.
Overall, the ALIFE2024 template is a valuable tool that can help to streamline the submission and review process, as well as improve the overall quality and consistency of the published research. However, it may be worth considering ways to make the template more flexible and to incorporate best practices for open science.
Conclusion
The ALIFE2024 template provides a standardized structure for authors to follow when submitting their research papers to the conference. By outlining the key sections and content requirements, the template aims to facilitate the review process and ensure a consistent format across all submissions.
The template's focus on clear organization and well-defined sections, such as the Introduction, Related Work, Methods, and Conclusion, can improve the overall readability and accessibility of the published research. This, in turn, can help to advance the field of artificial life by facilitating the dissemination and understanding of important findings.
While the template provides a solid foundation, there may be opportunities to further enhance it by allowing for more flexibility and incorporating best practices for open science. Nonetheless, the ALIFE2024 template represents a valuable resource for authors and a step towards improving the quality and consistency of research papers in the field of artificial life.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Phylogeny-Informed Interaction Estimation Accelerates Co-Evolutionary Learning
Jack Garbus, Thomas Willkens, Alexander Lalejini, Jordan Pollack
Co-evolution is a powerful problem-solving approach. However, fitness evaluation in co-evolutionary algorithms can be computationally expensive, as the quality of an individual in one population is defined by its interactions with many (or all) members of one or more other populations. To accelerate co-evolutionary systems, we introduce phylogeny-informed interaction estimation, which uses runtime phylogenetic analysis to estimate interaction outcomes between individuals based on how their relatives performed against each other. We test our interaction estimation method with three distinct co-evolutionary systems: two systems focused on measuring problem-solving success and one focused on measuring evolutionary open-endedness. We find that phylogeny-informed estimation can substantially reduce the computation required to solve problems, particularly at the beginning of long-term evolutionary runs. Additionally, we find that our estimation method initially jump-starts the evolution of neural complexity in our open-ended domain, but estimation-free systems eventually catch-up if given enough time. More broadly, continued refinements to these phylogeny-informed interaction estimation methods offers a promising path to reducing the computational cost of running co-evolutionary systems while maintaining their open-endedness.
Read more4/11/2024
0
A Guide to Tracking Phylogenies in Parallel and Distributed Agent-based Evolution Models
Matthew Andres Moreno, Anika Ranjan, Emily Dolson, Luis Zaman
Computer simulations are an important tool for studying the mechanics of biological evolution. In particular, in silico work with agent-based models provides an opportunity to collect high-quality records of ancestry relationships among simulated agents. Such phylogenies can provide insight into evolutionary dynamics within these simulations. Existing work generally tracks lineages directly, yielding an exact phylogenetic record of evolutionary history. However, direct tracking can be inefficient for large-scale, many-processor evolutionary simulations. An alternate approach to extracting phylogenetic information from simulation that scales more favorably is post hoc estimation, akin to how bioinformaticians build phylogenies by assessing genetic similarities between organisms. Recently introduced ``hereditary stratigraphy'' algorithms provide means for efficient inference of phylogenetic history from non-coding annotations on simulated organisms' genomes. A number of options exist in configuring hereditary stratigraphy methodology, but no work has yet tested how they impact reconstruction quality. To address this question, we surveyed reconstruction accuracy under alternate configurations across a matrix of evolutionary conditions varying in selection pressure, spatial structure, and ecological dynamics. We synthesize results from these experiments to suggest a prescriptive system of best practices for work with hereditary stratigraphy, ultimately guiding researchers in choosing appropriate instrumentation for large-scale simulation studies.
Read more5/17/2024
0
Cognitive Evolutionary Learning to Select Feature Interactions for Recommender Systems
Runlong Yu, Qixiang Shao, Qi Liu, Huan Liu, Enhong Chen
Feature interaction selection is a fundamental problem in commercial recommender systems. Most approaches equally enumerate all features and interactions by the same pre-defined operation under expert guidance. Their recommendation is unsatisfactory sometimes due to the following issues: (1)~They cannot ensure the learning abilities of models because their architectures are poorly adaptable to tasks and data; (2)~Useless features and interactions can bring unnecessary noise and complicate the training process. In this paper, we aim to adaptively evolve the model to select appropriate operations, features, and interactions under task guidance. Inspired by the evolution and functioning of natural organisms, we propose a novel textsl{Cognitive EvoLutionary Learning (CELL)} framework, where cognitive ability refers to a property of organisms that allows them to react and survive in diverse environments. It consists of three stages, i.e., DNA search, genome search, and model functioning. Specifically, if we regard the relationship between models and tasks as the relationship between organisms and natural environments, interactions of feature pairs can be analogous to double-stranded DNA, of which relevant features and interactions can be analogous to genomes. Along this line, we diagnose the fitness of the model on operations, features, and interactions to simulate the survival rates of organisms for natural selection. We show that CELL can adaptively evolve into different models for different tasks and data, which enables practitioners to access off-the-shelf models. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that CELL significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Also, we conduct synthetic experiments to ascertain that CELL can consistently discover the pre-defined interaction patterns for feature pairs.
Read more5/30/2024
🧪
0
Boltzmann machine learning and regularization methods for inferring evolutionary fields and couplings from a multiple sequence alignment
Sanzo Miyazawa
The inverse Potts problem to infer a Boltzmann distribution for homologous protein sequences from their single-site and pairwise amino acid frequencies recently attracts a great deal of attention in the studies of protein structure and evolution. We study regularization and learning methods and how to tune regularization parameters to correctly infer interactions in Boltzmann machine learning. Using $L_2$ regularization for fields, group $L_1$ for couplings is shown to be very effective for sparse couplings in comparison with $L_2$ and $L_1$. Two regularization parameters are tuned to yield equal values for both the sample and ensemble averages of evolutionary energy. Both averages smoothly change and converge, but their learning profiles are very different between learning methods. The Adam method is modified to make stepsize proportional to the gradient for sparse couplings. It is shown by first inferring interactions from protein sequences and then from Monte Carlo samples that the fields and couplings can be well recovered, but that recovering the pairwise correlations in the resolution of a total energy is harder for the natural proteins than for the protein-like sequences. Selective temperature for folding/structural constrains in protein evolution is also estimated.
Read more7/23/2024