Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulation

Read original: arXiv:2309.14402 - Published 7/17/2024 by Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li
Total Score

0

Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the manipulation of knowledge in language models, focusing on tasks such as knowledge injection, knowledge pruning, and knowledge recombination.
  • The authors investigate the underlying physics and dynamics of these knowledge manipulation processes, providing insights into the fundamental principles governing language models' ability to store, retrieve, and transform knowledge.
  • The paper builds upon previous work from the authors [link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/physics-language-models-part-31-knowledge-storage] and [link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/physics-language-models-part-33-knowledge-capacity], delving deeper into the mechanisms of knowledge manipulation.

Plain English Explanation

Language models, like the ones used in chatbots and virtual assistants, have an incredible ability to understand and generate human-like text. But how do these models actually manipulate the knowledge they've acquired? This paper explores the inner workings of language models when it comes to tasks like adding new information, removing outdated knowledge, and combining different pieces of information in novel ways.

The researchers investigate the "physics" behind these knowledge manipulation processes, looking at the fundamental principles that govern how language models can store, retrieve, and transform the knowledge they've learned. This builds on their previous work [link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/physics-language-models-part-31-knowledge-storage] and [link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/physics-language-models-part-33-knowledge-capacity], taking a deeper dive into the specific mechanisms involved.

Imagine a language model as a vast library of information, where each book represents a piece of knowledge. The researchers are studying how these models can add new books, remove outdated ones, and even combine information from different books to create new, insightful connections. This is crucial for making language models more flexible, adaptable, and capable of tackling complex real-world problems.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by providing an overview of the key knowledge manipulation tasks that the authors investigate, including knowledge injection, knowledge pruning, and knowledge recombination. [link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/physics-language-models-part-31-knowledge-storage]

The authors then delve into the preliminaries, establishing the theoretical framework and key concepts necessary to understand the underlying dynamics of these knowledge manipulation processes. This includes discussions of the energy landscape, knowledge representation, and the mechanisms of knowledge storage and retrieval within language models.

Building on this foundation, the researchers present a detailed analysis of the physics governing the various knowledge manipulation tasks. For example, they examine how the energy landscape of the language model evolves during knowledge injection, allowing the model to assimilate new information without catastrophically forgetting previously learned knowledge. [link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/physics-language-models-part-33-knowledge-capacity]

The paper also explores the challenges and trade-offs involved in knowledge pruning, where the model must selectively remove outdated or redundant information to maintain its performance and efficiency. Additionally, the authors investigate the dynamics of knowledge recombination, which enables language models to discover novel insights by combining disparate pieces of information in unique ways.

Throughout the analysis, the researchers draw connections to related work, such as [link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-can-better-understand-knowledge] and [link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-knowledge-model-perspectives-challenges], highlighting how their findings contribute to the broader understanding of knowledge representation and manipulation in large language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper offers a comprehensive and insightful exploration of the physics underlying knowledge manipulation in language models. The authors' rigorous theoretical framework and detailed analysis provide valuable insights into the fundamental mechanisms governing these processes.

One notable strength of the research is the authors' ability to connect their findings to previous work, [link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-are-cross-lingual-knowledge] demonstrating how their insights build upon and complement existing knowledge in the field. This helps situate the current study within the broader context of language model research and highlights its significance.

However, the paper does acknowledge certain limitations and areas for further exploration. For instance, the authors note that their analysis primarily focuses on monolingual language models, and it would be interesting to investigate the physics of knowledge manipulation in multilingual or cross-lingual models.

Additionally, while the paper provides a solid theoretical foundation, it would be beneficial to see more empirical validation of the proposed principles through experiments and case studies. This could help strengthen the practical applicability of the findings and demonstrate their relevance to real-world language model development and deployment.

Overall, this paper represents a valuable contribution to the understanding of language model dynamics, offering a nuanced and insightful perspective on the fundamental principles governing knowledge manipulation processes. The work lays a strong theoretical foundation and opens up avenues for future research to further explore the complexities of language model knowledge representation and transformation.

Conclusion

This paper delves into the fascinating world of knowledge manipulation within language models, shedding light on the underlying "physics" that govern how these models can store, retrieve, and transform the information they've learned. By exploring tasks like knowledge injection, pruning, and recombination, the researchers provide a deep understanding of the fundamental principles at play.

The insights gained from this work have important implications for the development of more flexible, adaptive, and capable language models. As these models become increasingly ubiquitous in our daily lives, through applications like chatbots and virtual assistants, the ability to effectively manage and manipulate knowledge becomes crucial for ensuring they can tackle complex, real-world problems.

The authors' rigorous theoretical framework and detailed analysis lay a strong foundation for future research in this area. Continued exploration of the physics underlying knowledge manipulation, as well as empirical validation through experiments, will undoubtedly lead to further advancements in the field of language model development and the broader realm of artificial intelligence.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulation
Total Score

0

Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulation

Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li

Language models can store vast factual knowledge, yet their ability to flexibly use this knowledge for downstream tasks (e.g., via instruction finetuning) remains questionable. This paper investigates four fundamental knowledge manipulation tasks: retrieval (e.g., What is person A's attribute X?), classification (e.g., Is A's attribute X even or odd?), comparison (e.g., Is A greater than B in attribute X?), and inverse search (e.g., Which person's attribute X equals T?). We show that language models excel in knowledge retrieval but struggle even in the simplest classification or comparison tasks unless Chain of Thoughts (CoTs) are employed during both training and inference. Moreover, their performance in inverse knowledge search is virtually 0%, regardless of the prompts. Our primary contribution is a controlled, synthetic experiment that confirms these weaknesses are inherent to language models: they cannot efficiently manipulate knowledge from pre-training data, even when such knowledge is perfectly stored in the models, despite adequate training and sufficient model size. Our findings also apply to modern pretrained language models such as GPT-4, thus giving rise to many Turing tests to distinguish Humans from contemporary AIs.

Read more

7/17/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extraction

Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li

Large language models (LLMs) can store a vast amount of world knowledge, often extractable via question-answering (e.g., What is Abraham Lincoln's birthday?). However, do they answer such questions based on exposure to similar questions during training (i.e., cheating), or by genuinely learning to extract knowledge from sources like Wikipedia? In this paper, we investigate this issue using a controlled biography dataset. We find a strong correlation between the model's ability to extract knowledge and various diversity measures of the training data. $textbf{Essentially}$, for knowledge to be reliably extracted, it must be sufficiently augmented (e.g., through paraphrasing, sentence shuffling, translations) $textit{during pretraining}$. Without such augmentation, knowledge may be memorized but not extractable, leading to 0% accuracy, regardless of subsequent instruction fine-tuning. To understand why this occurs, we employ (nearly) linear probing to demonstrate a strong connection between the observed correlation and how the model internally encodes knowledge -- whether it is linearly encoded in the hidden embeddings of entity names or distributed across other token embeddings in the training text. This paper provides $textbf{several key recommendations for LLM pretraining in the industry}$: (1) rewrite the pretraining data -- using small, auxiliary models -- to provide knowledge augmentation, and (2) incorporate more instruction-finetuning data into the pretraining stage before it becomes too late.

Read more

7/17/2024

💬

Total Score

2

Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Laws

Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li

Scaling laws describe the relationship between the size of language models and their capabilities. Unlike prior studies that evaluate a model's capability via loss or benchmarks, we estimate the number of knowledge bits a model stores. We focus on factual knowledge represented as tuples, such as (USA, capital, Washington D.C.) from a Wikipedia page. Through multiple controlled datasets, we establish that language models can and only can store 2 bits of knowledge per parameter, even when quantized to int8, and such knowledge can be flexibly extracted for downstream applications. Consequently, a 7B model can store 14B bits of knowledge, surpassing the English Wikipedia and textbooks combined based on our estimation. More broadly, we present 12 results on how (1) training duration, (2) model architecture, (3) quantization, (4) sparsity constraints such as MoE, and (5) data signal-to-noise ratio affect a model's knowledge storage capacity. Notable insights include: * The GPT-2 architecture, with rotary embedding, matches or even surpasses LLaMA/Mistral architectures in knowledge storage, particularly over shorter training durations. This arises because LLaMA/Mistral uses GatedMLP, which is less stable and harder to train. * Prepending training data with domain names (e.g., wikipedia.org) significantly increases a model's knowledge capacity. Language models can autonomously identify and prioritize domains rich in knowledge, optimizing their storage capacity.

Read more

4/9/2024

Does Knowledge Localization Hold True? Surprising Differences Between Entity and Relation Perspectives in Language Models
Total Score

0

Does Knowledge Localization Hold True? Surprising Differences Between Entity and Relation Perspectives in Language Models

Yifan Wei, Xiaoyan Yu, Yixuan Weng, Huanhuan Ma, Yuanzhe Zhang, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu

Large language models encapsulate knowledge and have demonstrated superior performance on various natural language processing tasks. Recent studies have localized this knowledge to specific model parameters, such as the MLP weights in intermediate layers. This study investigates the differences between entity and relational knowledge through knowledge editing. Our findings reveal that entity and relational knowledge cannot be directly transferred or mapped to each other. This result is unexpected, as logically, modifying the entity or the relation within the same knowledge triplet should yield equivalent outcomes. To further elucidate the differences between entity and relational knowledge, we employ causal analysis to investigate how relational knowledge is stored in pre-trained models. Contrary to prior research suggesting that knowledge is stored in MLP weights, our experiments demonstrate that relational knowledge is also significantly encoded in attention modules. This insight highlights the multifaceted nature of knowledge storage in language models, underscoring the complexity of manipulating specific types of knowledge within these models.

Read more

9/4/2024