A Planning Ontology to Represent and Exploit Planning Knowledge for Performance Efficiency

Read original: arXiv:2307.13549 - Published 7/9/2024 by Bharath Muppasani, Vishal Pallagani, Biplav Srivastava, Raghava Mutharaju, Michael N. Huhns, Vignesh Narayanan
Total Score

0

🚀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Ontologies can organize metadata, enable semantic queries, and promote reuse.
  • This paper explores using ontologies to improve automated planning, which aims to find a sequence of actions to reach a goal state.
  • The researchers hypothesize that information from diverse planning domains and available planners can be leveraged to select suitable planners and improve their performance.
  • They use data from the International Planning Competition to construct a planning ontology and demonstrate its benefits in two use cases.

Plain English Explanation

Ontologies are like virtual filing cabinets that help organize and manage large amounts of information. They can be particularly useful for automated planning, which is the process of finding a series of actions that will move an agent (like a robot) from an initial state to a desired goal state.

In this paper, the researchers suggest that by studying the wealth of information available on planning domains (the environments and problems planners operate in) and the different planning algorithms or "planners" that exist, they can build an ontology that will help select the most appropriate planner for a given task and even improve the planner's performance.

They use data from the International Planning Competition to construct this planning ontology, and then show in two example cases how the ontology can be used to pick better planners and enhance their capabilities through a technique called "macros" - essentially, pre-defined sequences of actions that the planner can leverage.

The key idea is that by systematically organizing planning-related information in an ontology, the researchers can uncover insights and connections that lead to more effective decision-making for autonomous agents operating in complex environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the benefits of ontologies, including their ability to organize rich metadata, support semantic queries, and promote reuse. The researchers then introduce the problem of automated planning, where the goal is to find a sequence of actions that will move an agent from an initial state to a desired goal state.

They hypothesize that the wealth of information available on planning domains and the diverse set of planners developed for the International Planning Competition contains valuable insights that can be leveraged to select suitable planners and improve their performance.

To test this hypothesis, the researchers construct a planning ontology using the IPC data. This ontology captures information about planning domains, the features of those domains, available planners, and the performance of planners in different domains.

Through experiments in two use cases, the researchers demonstrate that the planning ontology can be used to:

  1. Select promising planners for a given domain, and
  2. Improve the performance of those planners using "macros" - pre-defined sequences of actions extracted from the ontology.

The key contribution of this work is the creation of a planning ontology and the associated resources, which the researchers make available to the community to promote further research in this area.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel approach to leveraging ontologies for automated planning, which is a critical capability for advanced language models and autonomous agents. The use of the IPC dataset to construct the planning ontology is a strong foundation, as it provides a wealth of real-world data on planning domains and algorithms.

One potential limitation of the research is the scope of the evaluation, which focuses on two use cases. While these examples demonstrate the utility of the planning ontology, further testing on a broader range of planning domains and agent behaviors would be valuable to fully assess the approach's generalizability.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms by which the ontology enables planner selection and performance improvements through macros. A more detailed technical explanation of these processes could strengthen the work's reproducibility and impact.

Overall, this research represents an important step in leveraging structured knowledge to enhance automated planning capabilities, which are crucial for the development of advanced AI systems operating in complex, dynamic environments.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to improving automated planning by constructing a planning ontology from data on planning domains and available planners. The researchers demonstrate that this ontology can be used to select suitable planners for a given domain and enhance their performance through the use of pre-defined action sequences called macros.

The key contribution of this work is the creation of the planning ontology and associated resources, which the researchers make available to the community. This represents an important step in leveraging structured knowledge to enhance automated planning capabilities, which are crucial for the development of advanced AI systems operating in complex, dynamic environments.

While the evaluation is limited to two use cases, the findings suggest that the planning ontology approach has significant potential to advance the field of automated planning and promote more effective decision-making for autonomous agents.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🚀

Total Score

0

A Planning Ontology to Represent and Exploit Planning Knowledge for Performance Efficiency

Bharath Muppasani, Vishal Pallagani, Biplav Srivastava, Raghava Mutharaju, Michael N. Huhns, Vignesh Narayanan

Ontologies are known for their ability to organize rich metadata, support the identification of novel insights via semantic queries, and promote reuse. In this paper, we consider the problem of automated planning, where the objective is to find a sequence of actions that will move an agent from an initial state of the world to a desired goal state. We hypothesize that given a large number of available planners and diverse planning domains; they carry essential information that can be leveraged to identify suitable planners and improve their performance for a domain. We use data on planning domains and planners from the International Planning Competition (IPC) to construct a planning ontology and demonstrate via experiments in two use cases that the ontology can lead to the selection of promising planners and improving their performance using macros - a form of action ordering constraints extracted from planning ontology. We also make the planning ontology and associated resources available to the community to promote further research.

Read more

7/9/2024

🤷

Total Score

0

Planning with OWL-DL Ontologies (Extended Version)

Tobias John, Patrick Koopmann

We introduce ontology-mediated planning, in which planning problems are combined with an ontology. Our formalism differs from existing ones in that we focus on a strong separation of the formalisms for describing planning problems and ontologies, which are only losely coupled by an interface. Moreover, we present a black-box algorithm that supports the full expressive power of OWL DL. This goes beyond what existing approaches combining automated planning with ontologies can do, which only support limited description logics such as DL-Lite and description logics that are Horn. Our main algorithm relies on rewritings of the ontology-mediated planning specifications into PDDL, so that existing planning systems can be used to solve them. The algorithm relies on justifications, which allows for a generic approach that is independent of the expressivity of the ontology language. However, dedicated optimizations for computing justifications need to be implemented to enable an efficient rewriting procedure. We evaluated our implementation on benchmark sets from several domains. The evaluation shows that our procedure works in practice and that tailoring the reasoning procedure has significant impact on the performance.

Read more

8/15/2024

Learning Planning Abstractions from Language
Total Score

0

Learning Planning Abstractions from Language

Weiyu Liu, Geng Chen, Joy Hsu, Jiayuan Mao, Jiajun Wu

This paper presents a framework for learning state and action abstractions in sequential decision-making domains. Our framework, planning abstraction from language (PARL), utilizes language-annotated demonstrations to automatically discover a symbolic and abstract action space and induce a latent state abstraction based on it. PARL consists of three stages: 1) recovering object-level and action concepts, 2) learning state abstractions, abstract action feasibility, and transition models, and 3) applying low-level policies for abstract actions. During inference, given the task description, PARL first makes abstract action plans using the latent transition and feasibility functions, then refines the high-level plan using low-level policies. PARL generalizes across scenarios involving novel object instances and environments, unseen concept compositions, and tasks that require longer planning horizons than settings it is trained on.

Read more

5/8/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Temporal Planning via Interval Logic Satisfiability for Autonomous Systems

Miquel Ramirez, Anubhav Singh, Peter Stuckey, Chris Manzie

Many automated planning methods and formulations rely on suitably designed abstractions or simplifications of the constrained dynamics associated with agents to attain computational scalability. We consider formulations of temporal planning where intervals are associated with both action and fluent atoms, and relations between these are given as sentences in Allen's Interval Logic. We propose a notion of planning graphs that can account for complex concurrency relations between actions and fluents as a Constraint Programming (CP) model. We test an implementation of our algorithm on a state-of-the-art framework for CP and compare it with PDDL 2.1 planners that capture plans requiring complex concurrent interactions between agents. We demonstrate our algorithm outperforms existing PDDL 2.1 planners in the case studies. Still, scalability remains challenging when plans must comply with intricate concurrent interactions and the sequencing of actions.

Read more

6/17/2024