Temporal Planning via Interval Logic Satisfiability for Autonomous Systems
2406.09661
0
0
π
Abstract
Many automated planning methods and formulations rely on suitably designed abstractions or simplifications of the constrained dynamics associated with agents to attain computational scalability. We consider formulations of temporal planning where intervals are associated with both action and fluent atoms, and relations between these are given as sentences in Allen's Interval Logic. We propose a notion of planning graphs that can account for complex concurrency relations between actions and fluents as a Constraint Programming (CP) model. We test an implementation of our algorithm on a state-of-the-art framework for CP and compare it with PDDL 2.1 planners that capture plans requiring complex concurrent interactions between agents. We demonstrate our algorithm outperforms existing PDDL 2.1 planners in the case studies. Still, scalability remains challenging when plans must comply with intricate concurrent interactions and the sequencing of actions.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces the concept of using system models to derive domain theories
- Discusses the role of state models and causal systems in this process
- Explores the implications of these models for planning and control applications
Plain English Explanation
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/reactive-temporal-logic-based-planning-control-interactive">System models</a> can be used to derive <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/prioritize-team-actions-multi-agent-temporal-logic">domain theories</a>, which are formal representations of the key concepts and relationships within a particular field or application. By starting with a model of the system's state and the causal relationships between its components, researchers can build a more structured and rigorous understanding of the domain.
This approach is particularly useful for planning and control tasks, where having a clear, <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/fast-adaptive-multi-agent-planning-under-collaborative">well-defined domain model</a> can help optimize decision-making and ensure reliable system behavior. For example, in a robotics application, the system model might capture the physical dynamics of the robot's movements, while the domain theory would describe higher-level concepts like navigation, object manipulation, and task planning.
By grounding the domain theory in a formal system model, researchers can ensure that it accurately reflects the underlying reality of the system, rather than relying on more informal or intuitive understandings. This can lead to more robust and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/metric-temporal-equilibrium-logic-over-timed-traces">predictable system behavior</a>, as well as the ability to reason about and verify the correctness of planning and control algorithms.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the idea of deriving <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/decomposition-based-hierarchical-task-allocation-planning-multi">domain theories</a> from formal system models, which describe the state and causal relationships of a particular application or environment.
The authors discuss two key types of system models:
-
System State Models: These capture the set of possible states the system can be in, as well as the transitions between those states. For example, a robot's state model might include its position, orientation, and the state of its end effectors.
-
Strictly Causal Systems: These models describe the causal relationships between different system components, ensuring that the effects of actions are strictly determined by the current state and do not depend on future inputs or states.
By formalizing these system models, the researchers argue that it becomes possible to derive more rigorous and reliable <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/prioritize-team-actions-multi-agent-temporal-logic">domain theories</a>. These theories can then be used to support planning, control, and other decision-making tasks, as they provide a clear and well-defined understanding of the key concepts and dynamics within the domain.
The authors discuss the implications of this approach for a range of applications, including robotics, human-computer interaction, and general AI systems. They also highlight the potential benefits in terms of improving the reliability, predictability, and verifiability of these systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to grounding domain theories in formal system models, which can help address some of the limitations of more intuitive or ad-hoc domain modeling approaches. By starting with a rigorous description of the system's state and causal dynamics, researchers can build domain theories that are more firmly rooted in the underlying reality of the application.
One potential limitation of this approach is the challenge of accurately capturing all the relevant aspects of a complex system in a formal model. In practice, simplifying assumptions and abstractions may be necessary, which could lead to domain theories that do not fully reflect the nuances and edge cases of the real-world system.
Additionally, the process of deriving domain theories from system models may be computationally intensive and require significant domain expertise. Developing efficient algorithms and toolsets to automate this process could be an important area for future research.
Despite these potential challenges, the general approach of using formal system models to inform domain theories is a promising direction for improving the reliability and predictability of planning, control, and decision-making systems. By grounding these systems in a clearer understanding of the underlying domain, researchers can work towards more robust and trustworthy AI applications.
Conclusion
This paper introduces the idea of using formal system models to derive domain theories, which can then be leveraged to support planning, control, and other decision-making tasks. By starting with a rigorous description of the system's state and causal dynamics, researchers can build domain theories that are more firmly rooted in the underlying reality of the application.
This approach has the potential to improve the reliability, predictability, and verifiability of a wide range of AI systems, from robotics and human-computer interaction to general intelligence applications. While there are some challenges in accurately capturing complex systems in formal models, the benefits of this approach in terms of improved domain understanding and decision-making make it a promising direction for future research and development.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
β
Reactive Temporal Logic-based Planning and Control for Interactive Robotic Tasks
Farhad Nawaz, Shaoting Peng, Lars Lindemann, Nadia Figueroa, Nikolai Matni
0
0
Robots interacting with humans must be safe, reactive and adapt online to unforeseen environmental and task changes. Achieving these requirements concurrently is a challenge as interactive planners lack formal safety guarantees, while safe motion planners lack flexibility to adapt. To tackle this, we propose a modular control architecture that generates both safe and reactive motion plans for human-robot interaction by integrating temporal logic-based discrete task level plans with continuous Dynamical System (DS)-based motion plans. We formulate a reactive temporal logic formula that enables users to define task specifications through structured language, and propose a planning algorithm at the task level that generates a sequence of desired robot behaviors while being adaptive to environmental changes. At the motion level, we incorporate control Lyapunov functions and control barrier functions to compute stable and safe continuous motion plans for two types of robot behaviors: (i) complex, possibly periodic motions given by autonomous DS and (ii) time-critical tasks specified by Signal Temporal Logic~(STL). Our methodology is demonstrated on the Franka robot arm performing wiping tasks on a whiteboard and a mannequin that is compliant to human interactions and adaptive to environmental changes.
5/1/2024
β¨
Prioritize Team Actions: Multi-Agent Temporal Logic Task Planning with Ordering Constraints
Bowen Ye, Jianing Zhao, Shaoyuan Li, Xiang Yin
0
0
In this paper, we investigate the problem of linear temporal logic (LTL) path planning for multi-agent systems, introducing the new concept of emph{ordering constraints}. Specifically, we consider a generic objective function that is defined for the path of each individual agent. The primary objective is to find a global plan for the team of agents, ensuring they collectively meet the specified LTL requirements. Simultaneously, we aim to maintain a pre-determined order in the values of the objective function for each agent, which we refer to as the ordering constraints. This new requirement stems from scenarios like security-aware planning, where relative orders outweigh absolute values in importance. We present an efficient algorithm to solve this problem, supported by proofs of correctness that demonstrate the optimality of our solution. Additionally, we provide a case study in security-aware path planning to illustrate the practicality and effectiveness of our proposed approach.
4/9/2024
β
Fast and Adaptive Multi-agent Planning under Collaborative Temporal Logic Tasks via Poset Products
Zesen Liu, Meng Guo, Weimin Bao, Zhongkui Li
0
0
Efficient coordination and planning is essential for large-scale multi-agent systems that collaborate in a shared dynamic environment. Heuristic search methods or learning-based approaches often lack the guarantee on correctness and performance. Moreover, when the collaborative tasks contain both spatial and temporal requirements, e.g., as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) formulas, formal methods provide a verifiable framework for task planning. However, since the planning complexity grows exponentially with the number of agents and the length of the task formula, existing studies are mostly limited to small artificial cases. To address this issue, a new planning paradigm is proposed in this work for system-wide temporal task formulas that are released online and continually. It avoids two common bottlenecks in the traditional methods, i.e., (i) the direct translation of the complete task formula to the associated Buchi automaton; and (ii) the synchronized product between the Buchi automaton and the transition models of all agents. Instead, an adaptive planning algorithm is proposed that computes the product of relaxed partially-ordered sets (R-posets) on-the-fly, and assigns these subtasks to the agents subject to the ordering constraints. It is shown that the first valid plan can be derived with a polynomial time and memory complexity w.r.t. the system size and the formula length. Our method can take into account task formulas with a length of more than 400 and a fleet with more than $400$ agents, while most existing methods fail at the formula length of 25 within a reasonable duration. The proposed method is validated on large fleets of service robots in both simulation and hardware experiments.
4/10/2024
β
Metric Temporal Equilibrium Logic over Timed Traces
Arvid Becker, Pedro Cabalar, Mart'in Di'eguez, Torsten Schaub, Anna Schuhmann
0
0
In temporal extensions of Answer Set Programming (ASP) based on linear-time, the behavior of dynamic systems is captured by sequences of states. While this representation reflects their relative order, it abstracts away the specific times associated with each state. However, timing constraints are important in many applications like, for instance, when planning and scheduling go hand in hand. We address this by developing a metric extension of linear-time temporal equilibrium logic, in which temporal operators are constrained by intervals over natural numbers. The resulting Metric Equilibrium Logic provides the foundation of an ASP-based approach for specifying qualitative and quantitative dynamic constraints. To this end, we define a translation of metric formulas into monadic first-order formulas and give a correspondence between their models in Metric Equilibrium Logic and Monadic Quantified Equilibrium Logic, respectively. Interestingly, our translation provides a blue print for implementation in terms of ASP modulo difference constraints.
5/6/2024