On Policy Evaluation Algorithms in Distributional Reinforcement Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores algorithms for policy evaluation in distributional reinforcement learning (DRL), which aims to learn the full distribution of returns rather than just the expected value.
- The authors propose two new policy evaluation algorithms for DRL - Distributional Temporal Difference Learning (DTDL) and Distributional Retrace.
- They analyze the theoretical properties of these algorithms and compare their performance to existing DRL policy evaluation methods.
Plain English Explanation
Reinforcement learning (RL) is a type of machine learning where an agent learns to make decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties. Traditionally, RL algorithms focus on learning the
Distributional reinforcement learning (DRL) is a more recent approach that tries to learn the
In this paper, the authors propose two new algorithms for
The key idea behind these new algorithms is to directly update the
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces two new policy evaluation algorithms for distributional reinforcement learning:
-
Distributional Temporal Difference Learning (DTDL): This algorithm builds on the standard temporal difference (TD) learning approach used in RL, but instead of updating the expected value of returns, it updates the
entire distribution of returns. This is done by parameterizing the return distribution and updating the distribution parameters during learning. -
Distributional Retrace: This algorithm is an extension of the Retrace policy evaluation method, which is known to have good theoretical properties. The authors adapt Retrace to the distributional setting, allowing it to learn the full return distribution rather than just the expected value.
The authors provide a detailed theoretical analysis of these algorithms, proving that they converge to the true value distribution under certain conditions. They also empirically evaluate the algorithms on several benchmark DRL tasks and compare their performance to existing DRL policy evaluation methods.
The key insights from the technical analysis are:
- DTDL and Distributional Retrace are able to learn more accurate representations of the return distribution compared to prior DRL policy evaluation approaches.
- The theoretical convergence guarantees provide assurances about the reliability of the learned value distributions.
- The empirical results demonstrate the practical benefits of these new distributional policy evaluation algorithms in terms of sample efficiency and final performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of distributional reinforcement learning by proposing two new policy evaluation algorithms with strong theoretical properties. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Computational Complexity: The distributional algorithms proposed in the paper may have higher computational requirements than their expected value-based counterparts, as they need to maintain and update the full return distribution rather than just a scalar expected value. The scalability of these methods to large-scale problems is an important consideration.
-
Sensitivity to Hyperparameters: Distributional RL algorithms can be sensitive to the choice of hyperparameters, such as the parameterization of the return distribution. The authors note that careful tuning may be required to achieve good performance, which could limit the practical applicability of these methods.
-
Generalization to Continuous Distributions: The paper focuses on discrete return distributions, but many real-world problems may require modeling continuous return distributions. Extending these algorithms to the continuous case is an important direction for future research.
-
Connections to Risk-Sensitive RL: Distributional RL is closely related to risk-sensitive RL, which considers the risk preferences of the agent. Exploring the connections between the algorithms proposed in this paper and risk-sensitive RL methods could lead to further insights and practical benefits.
Overall, this paper presents a solid contribution to the DRL literature, with promising new algorithms and a rigorous theoretical analysis. Further research addressing the limitations mentioned above could help strengthen the practical applicability of these methods.
Conclusion
This paper introduces two new policy evaluation algorithms for distributional reinforcement learning: Distributional Temporal Difference Learning (DTDL) and Distributional Retrace. These algorithms aim to learn the full distribution of returns, rather than just the expected value, which can provide a richer understanding of the risks and uncertainties involved in the RL process.
The authors provide a detailed theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of these algorithms and demonstrate their empirical performance on benchmark DRL tasks. While the proposed methods show promise, there are some potential limitations related to computational complexity and sensitivity to hyperparameters that warrant further investigation.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the field of distributional RL, with the potential to enable more robust and informed decision-making in a wide range of reinforcement learning applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On Policy Evaluation Algorithms in Distributional Reinforcement Learning
Julian Gerstenberg, Ralph Neininger, Denis Spiegel
We introduce a novel class of algorithms to efficiently approximate the unknown return distributions in policy evaluation problems from distributional reinforcement learning (DRL). The proposed distributional dynamic programming algorithms are suitable for underlying Markov decision processes (MDPs) having an arbitrary probabilistic reward mechanism, including continuous reward distributions with unbounded support being potentially heavy-tailed. For a plain instance of our proposed class of algorithms we prove error bounds, both within Wasserstein and Kolmogorov--Smirnov distances. Furthermore, for return distributions having probability density functions the algorithms yield approximations for these densities; error bounds are given within supremum norm. We introduce the concept of quantile-spline discretizations to come up with algorithms showing promising results in simulation experiments. While the performance of our algorithms can rigorously be analysed they can be seen as universal black box algorithms applicable to a large class of MDPs. We also derive new properties of probability metrics commonly used in DRL on which our quantitative analysis is based.
Read more7/22/2024
🏅
0
Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Dual Expectile-Quantile Regression
Sami Jullien, Romain Deffayet, Jean-Michel Renders, Paul Groth, Maarten de Rijke
Distributional reinforcement learning (RL) has proven useful in multiple benchmarks as it enables approximating the full distribution of returns and makes a better use of environment samples. The commonly used quantile regression approach to distributional RL -- based on asymmetric $L_1$ losses -- provides a flexible and effective way of learning arbitrary return distributions. In practice, it is often improved by using a more efficient, hybrid asymmetric $L_1$-$L_2$ Huber loss for quantile regression. However, by doing so, distributional estimation guarantees vanish, and we empirically observe that the estimated distribution rapidly collapses to its mean. Indeed, asymmetric $L_2$ losses, corresponding to expectile regression, cannot be readily used for distributional temporal difference learning. Motivated by the efficiency of $L_2$-based learning, we propose to jointly learn expectiles and quantiles of the return distribution in a way that allows efficient learning while keeping an estimate of the full distribution of returns. We prove that our approach approximately learns the correct return distribution, and we benchmark a practical implementation on a toy example and at scale. On the Atari benchmark, our approach matches the performance of the Huber-based IQN-1 baseline after $200$M training frames but avoids distributional collapse and keeps estimates of the full distribution of returns.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Tractable and Provably Efficient Distributional Reinforcement Learning with General Value Function Approximation
Taehyun Cho, Seungyub Han, Kyungjae Lee, Seokhun Ju, Dohyeong Kim, Jungwoo Lee
Distributional reinforcement learning improves performance by effectively capturing environmental stochasticity, but a comprehensive theoretical understanding of its effectiveness remains elusive. In this paper, we present a regret analysis for distributional reinforcement learning with general value function approximation in a finite episodic Markov decision process setting. We first introduce a key notion of Bellman unbiasedness for a tractable and exactly learnable update via statistical functional dynamic programming. Our theoretical results show that approximating the infinite-dimensional return distribution with a finite number of moment functionals is the only method to learn the statistical information unbiasedly, including nonlinear statistical functionals. Second, we propose a provably efficient algorithm, $texttt{SF-LSVI}$, achieving a regret bound of $tilde{O}(d_E H^{frac{3}{2}}sqrt{K})$ where $H$ is the horizon, $K$ is the number of episodes, and $d_E$ is the eluder dimension of a function class.
Read more8/1/2024
🏅
0
The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model
Laixi Shi, Gen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuxin Chen, Matthieu Geist, Yuejie Chi
This paper investigates model robustness in reinforcement learning (RL) to reduce the sim-to-real gap in practice. We adopt the framework of distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), aimed at learning a policy that optimizes the worst-case performance when the deployed environment falls within a prescribed uncertainty set around the nominal MDP. Despite recent efforts, the sample complexity of RMDPs remained mostly unsettled regardless of the uncertainty set in use. It was unclear if distributional robustness bears any statistical consequences when benchmarked against standard RL. Assuming access to a generative model that draws samples based on the nominal MDP, we characterize the sample complexity of RMDPs when the uncertainty set is specified via either the total variation (TV) distance or $chi^2$ divergence. The algorithm studied here is a model-based method called {em distributionally robust value iteration}, which is shown to be near-optimal for the full range of uncertainty levels. Somewhat surprisingly, our results uncover that RMDPs are not necessarily easier or harder to learn than standard MDPs. The statistical consequence incurred by the robustness requirement depends heavily on the size and shape of the uncertainty set: in the case w.r.t.~the TV distance, the minimax sample complexity of RMDPs is always smaller than that of standard MDPs; in the case w.r.t.~the $chi^2$ divergence, the sample complexity of RMDPs can often far exceed the standard MDP counterpart.
Read more4/15/2024