Policy Prototyping for LLMs: Pluralistic Alignment via Interactive and Collaborative Policymaking
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a framework for "policy prototyping" - an interactive and collaborative approach to developing policies for large language models (LLMs) to achieve pluralistic alignment.
- The goal is to enable diverse stakeholders to participate in the policy development process, fostering more inclusive and representative policies.
- The framework involves iterative cycles of policy proposal, feedback, and refinement, facilitated by a modular policy architecture and user interface tools.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to create guidelines, or "policies," for how large language AI systems should behave. The key idea is to make this process more interactive and collaborative, involving a wider range of people instead of just a small group of experts.
The goal is to develop policies that are more pluralistically aligned - that is, they take into account the perspectives and values of diverse stakeholders, not just a select few. This is important because these language AI systems will have a big impact on society, so their policies should reflect the interests of the many, not just the few.
The framework involves an iterative cycle where policy proposals are made, feedback is collected, and the policies are refined based on that input. This happens through a modular policy architecture and special user interface tools that make it easy for people to engage with and shape the policy development process.
The goal is to create policies for language AIs that are more representative and inclusive, reflecting the diversity of views in society, rather than just the perspectives of a small group of policymakers.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a "policy prototyping" framework for developing policies for large language models (LLMs) in a more interactive and collaborative manner. The key elements include:
-
Modular Policy Architecture: The policies are structured in a modular way, with individual policy components that can be more easily proposed, tested, and refined.
-
Interactive Feedback Loops: The policy development process involves iterative cycles of policy proposal, feedback collection from diverse stakeholders, and policy refinement. This enables an ongoing, collaborative policymaking process.
-
User Interface Tools: The framework includes specialized user interface tools that facilitate stakeholder engagement and make the policy prototyping process more accessible and intuitive.
The goal is to enable a more pluralistic alignment of LLM policies - one that reflects the values and interests of a diverse range of stakeholders, rather than just a small group of experts or policymakers. This is intended to result in policies that are more representative and inclusive of societal perspectives.
Critical Analysis
The policy prototyping framework presented in the paper appears promising as a way to make the development of LLM policies more inclusive and collaborative. By involving diverse stakeholders throughout the iterative process, the approach has the potential to result in policies that are better aligned with societal values and interests.
However, the paper does not address some potential challenges and limitations of this approach:
-
Participant Recruitment and Representation: Ensuring adequate and representative participation from all relevant stakeholder groups may be difficult in practice.
-
Power Imbalances: There is a risk that certain groups may still wield disproportionate influence in the policy prototyping process, despite the intention of pluralism.
-
Scalability: Maintaining an interactive and collaborative policymaking process as LLM systems grow in scale and complexity may become increasingly challenging.
-
Evaluation and Impact Assessment: The paper does not discuss how the effectiveness and real-world impact of the resulting policies would be measured and evaluated.
Despite these potential issues, the policy prototyping framework represents an important step towards more inclusive and democratically-informed policymaking for transformative AI systems like LLMs. Further research and experimentation will be needed to refine and validate the approach.
Conclusion
The policy prototyping framework presented in this paper offers a novel approach to developing policies for large language models (LLMs) in a more interactive, collaborative, and pluralistically-aligned manner. By involving diverse stakeholders throughout an iterative policymaking process, the framework aims to create policies that better reflect societal values and interests, rather than just those of a small group of experts or policymakers.
While the approach has promising potential, the paper also highlights the need to carefully consider challenges around participant representation, power imbalances, scalability, and impact assessment. Nonetheless, this research represents an important step towards more inclusive and democratically-informed policymaking for transformative AI systems like LLMs, with significant implications for how we govern the development and deployment of these powerful technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Policy Prototyping for LLMs: Pluralistic Alignment via Interactive and Collaborative Policymaking
K. J. Kevin Feng, Inyoung Cheong, Quan Ze Chen, Amy X. Zhang
Emerging efforts in AI alignment seek to broaden participation in shaping model behavior by eliciting and integrating collective input into a policy for model finetuning. While pluralistic, these processes are often linear and do not allow participating stakeholders to confirm whether potential outcomes of their contributions are indeed consistent with their intentions. Design prototyping has long advocated for rapid iteration using tight feedback loops of ideation, experimentation, and evaluation to mitigate these issues. We thus propose policy prototyping for LLMs, a new process that draws inspiration from prototyping practices to enable stakeholders to collaboratively and interactively draft LLM policies. Through learnings from a real-world LLM policymaking initiative at an industrial AI lab, we motivate our approach and characterize policy prototyping with four guiding principles. Because policy prototyping emphasizes a contrasting set of priorities compared to previous approaches, we envision our approach to be a valuable addition to the methodological repertoire for pluralistic alignment.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM Collaboration
Shangbin Feng, Taylor Sorensen, Yuhan Liu, Jillian Fisher, Chan Young Park, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov
While existing alignment paradigms have been integral in developing large language models (LLMs), LLMs often learn an averaged human preference and struggle to model diverse preferences across cultures, demographics, and communities. We propose Modular Pluralism, a modular framework based on multi-LLM collaboration for pluralistic alignment: it plugs into a base LLM a pool of smaller but specialized community LMs, where models collaborate in distinct modes to flexibility support three modes of pluralism: Overton, steerable, and distributional. Modular Pluralism is uniquely compatible with black-box LLMs and offers the modular control of adding new community LMs for previously underrepresented communities. We evaluate Modular Pluralism with six tasks and four datasets featuring questions/instructions with value-laden and perspective-informed responses. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Modular Pluralism advances the three pluralism objectives across six black-box and open-source LLMs. Further analysis reveals that LLMs are generally faithful to the inputs from smaller community LLMs, allowing seamless patching by adding a new community LM to better cover previously underrepresented communities.
Read more6/26/2024
0
A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment
Taylor Sorensen, Jared Moore, Jillian Fisher, Mitchell Gordon, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Christopher Michael Rytting, Andre Ye, Liwei Jiang, Ximing Lu, Nouha Dziri, Tim Althoff, Yejin Choi
With increased power and prevalence of AI systems, it is ever more critical that AI systems are designed to serve all, i.e., people with diverse values and perspectives. However, aligning models to serve pluralistic human values remains an open research question. In this piece, we propose a roadmap to pluralistic alignment, specifically using language models as a test bed. We identify and formalize three possible ways to define and operationalize pluralism in AI systems: 1) Overton pluralistic models that present a spectrum of reasonable responses; 2) Steerably pluralistic models that can steer to reflect certain perspectives; and 3) Distributionally pluralistic models that are well-calibrated to a given population in distribution. We also formalize and discuss three possible classes of pluralistic benchmarks: 1) Multi-objective benchmarks, 2) Trade-off steerable benchmarks, which incentivize models to steer to arbitrary trade-offs, and 3) Jury-pluralistic benchmarks which explicitly model diverse human ratings. We use this framework to argue that current alignment techniques may be fundamentally limited for pluralistic AI; indeed, we highlight empirical evidence, both from our own experiments and from other work, that standard alignment procedures might reduce distributional pluralism in models, motivating the need for further research on pluralistic alignment.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Agent-Pro: Learning to Evolve via Policy-Level Reflection and Optimization
Wenqi Zhang, Ke Tang, Hai Wu, Mengna Wang, Yongliang Shen, Guiyang Hou, Zeqi Tan, Peng Li, Yueting Zhuang, Weiming Lu
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit robust problem-solving capabilities for diverse tasks. However, most LLM-based agents are designed as specific task solvers with sophisticated prompt engineering, rather than agents capable of learning and evolving through interactions. These task solvers necessitate manually crafted prompts to inform task rules and regulate LLM behaviors, inherently incapacitating to address complex dynamic scenarios e.g., large interactive games. In light of this, we propose Agent-Pro: an LLM-based Agent with Policy-level Reflection and Optimization that can learn a wealth of expertise from interactive experiences and progressively elevate its behavioral policy. Specifically, it involves a dynamic belief generation and reflection process for policy evolution. Rather than action-level reflection, Agent-Pro iteratively reflects on past trajectories and beliefs, fine-tuning its irrational beliefs for a better policy. Moreover, a depth-first search is employed for policy optimization, ensuring continual enhancement in policy payoffs. Agent-Pro is evaluated across two games: Blackjack and Texas Hold'em, outperforming vanilla LLM and specialized models. Our results show Agent-Pro can learn and evolve in complex and dynamic scenes, which also benefits numerous LLM-based applications.
Read more6/10/2024