DIDUP: Dynamic Iterative Development for UI Prototyping

Read original: arXiv:2407.08474 - Published 7/12/2024 by Jenny Ma, Karthik Sreedhar, Vivian Liu, Sitong Wang, Pedro Alejandro Perez, Lydia B. Chilton
Total Score

0

DIDUP: Dynamic Iterative Development for UI Prototyping

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces DIDUP, a new approach for dynamic and iterative development of user interface (UI) prototypes
  • Leverages generative AI to enable rapid iteration and exploration of UI design concepts
  • Aims to improve the efficiency and flexibility of the UI prototyping process

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new method called DIDUP (Dynamic Iterative Development for UI Prototyping) that uses generative AI to streamline the process of creating and iterating on user interface (UI) prototypes. Traditionally, UI design and prototyping can be a time-consuming and tedious process, requiring designers to manually update and refine their designs. DIDUP aims to address this by allowing designers to quickly generate and modify UI elements using AI-powered tools.

The key idea behind DIDUP is to enable a more dynamic and iterative approach to UI prototyping. Rather than having to painstakingly update designs by hand, designers can leverage generative AI models to rapidly generate and adjust UI components based on their evolving ideas and feedback from stakeholders. This allows for a more exploratory and flexible design process, where designers can quickly try out different concepts and iterate on them until they land on the right solution.

The paper introduces DIDUP, a new approach that uses generative AI to enable dynamic and iterative development of user interface (UI) prototypes, which can improve the efficiency and flexibility of the UI prototyping process.

Technical Explanation

The DIDUP approach involves several key components:

  1. Generative AI Models: DIDUP leverages generative AI models, such as large language models and image generation systems, to dynamically create and modify UI elements based on designer input and feedback.

  2. Iterative Prototyping: The system allows designers to quickly iterate on their UI designs, experimenting with different layouts, components, and interactions in an exploratory manner.

  3. Integrated Design Tools: DIDUP integrates with existing design tools and workflows, enabling designers to seamlessly incorporate the AI-generated content into their prototypes.

  4. Real-time Collaboration: The system supports real-time collaboration, allowing multiple designers to work on the same prototype simultaneously and see each other's updates in real-time.

The paper describes how DIDUP uses generative AI models, iterative prototyping, integrated design tools, and real-time collaboration to enable a more dynamic and efficient UI prototyping process.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling vision for how generative AI can be leveraged to improve the UI prototyping process. However, it's important to note that the paper is a conceptual proposal and does not present a fully implemented system or evaluation of its effectiveness.

Some potential limitations and areas for further research include:

  • Technical Feasibility: The paper does not delve into the specific technical challenges of integrating generative AI models into a coherent design workflow. Ensuring reliable and high-quality AI-generated content may require significant engineering effort.

  • User Evaluation: The paper does not provide any user studies or empirical evidence to demonstrate the real-world benefits of the DIDUP approach. Evaluating the system's usability, productivity gains, and overall user experience would be crucial.

  • Ethical Considerations: As with any AI-powered system, there may be ethical concerns around the use of generative models in the design process, such as the potential for bias or the impact on human designers' roles and skills.

While the paper presents a compelling vision for using generative AI to improve UI prototyping, it lacks details on the technical feasibility, user evaluation, and potential ethical considerations that would need to be addressed in a fully implemented system.

Conclusion

The DIDUP approach introduced in this paper offers a promising direction for leveraging generative AI to streamline the UI prototyping process. By enabling more dynamic and iterative design workflows, DIDUP has the potential to improve the efficiency, flexibility, and creativity of UI design, ultimately leading to better user experiences.

However, the successful implementation of DIDUP will require addressing several technical and practical challenges, as well as conducting thorough user evaluations and considering the ethical implications of integrating generative AI into the design process.

The DIDUP approach presents a promising way to use generative AI to improve the efficiency and flexibility of the UI prototyping process, but further research is needed to address the technical, practical, and ethical considerations.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

DIDUP: Dynamic Iterative Development for UI Prototyping
Total Score

0

DIDUP: Dynamic Iterative Development for UI Prototyping

Jenny Ma, Karthik Sreedhar, Vivian Liu, Sitong Wang, Pedro Alejandro Perez, Lydia B. Chilton

Large language models (LLMs) are remarkably good at writing code. A particularly valuable case of human-LLM collaboration is code-based UI prototyping, a method for creating interactive prototypes that allows users to view and fully engage with a user interface. We conduct a formative study of GPT Pilot, a leading LLM-generated code-prototyping system, and find that its inflexibility towards change once development has started leads to weaknesses in failure prevention and dynamic planning; it closely resembles the linear workflow of the waterfall model. We introduce DIDUP, a system for code-based UI prototyping that follows an iterative spiral model, which takes changes and iterations that come up during the development process into account. We propose three novel mechanisms for LLM-generated code-prototyping systems: (1) adaptive planning, where plans should be dynamic and reflect changes during implementation, (2) code injection, where the system should write a minimal amount of code and inject it instead of rewriting code so users have a better mental model of the code evolution, and (3) lightweight state management, a simplified version of source control so users can quickly revert to different working states. Together, this enables users to rapidly develop and iterate on prototypes.

Read more

7/12/2024

UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedback
Total Score

0

UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedback

Jason Wu, Eldon Schoop, Alan Leung, Titus Barik, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Jeffrey Nichols

Large language models (LLMs) struggle to consistently generate UI code that compiles and produces visually relevant designs. Existing approaches to improve generation rely on expensive human feedback or distilling a proprietary model. In this paper, we explore the use of automated feedback (compilers and multi-modal models) to guide LLMs to generate high-quality UI code. Our method starts with an existing LLM and iteratively produces improved models by self-generating a large synthetic dataset using an original model, applying automated tools to aggressively filter, score, and de-duplicate the data into a refined higher quality dataset. The original LLM is improved by finetuning on this refined dataset. We applied our approach to several open-source LLMs and compared the resulting performance to baseline models with both automated metrics and human preferences. Our evaluation shows the resulting models outperform all other downloadable baselines and approach the performance of larger proprietary models.

Read more

6/13/2024

Large Language User Interfaces: Voice Interactive User Interfaces powered by LLMs
Total Score

0

Large Language User Interfaces: Voice Interactive User Interfaces powered by LLMs

Syed Mekael Wasti, Ken Q. Pu, Ali Neshati

The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has showcased remarkable capacities for logical reasoning and natural language comprehension. These capabilities can be leveraged in solutions that semantically and textually model complex problems. In this paper, we present our efforts toward constructing a framework that can serve as an intermediary between a user and their user interface (UI), enabling dynamic and real-time interactions. We employ a system that stands upon textual semantic mappings of UI components, in the form of annotations. These mappings are stored, parsed, and scaled in a custom data structure, supplementary to an agent-based prompting backend engine. Employing textual semantic mappings allows each component to not only explain its role to the engine but also provide expectations. By comprehending the needs of both the user and the components, our LLM engine can classify the most appropriate application, extract relevant parameters, and subsequently execute precise predictions of the user's expected actions. Such an integration evolves static user interfaces into highly dynamic and adaptable solutions, introducing a new frontier of intelligent and responsive user experiences.

Read more

4/17/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Human-Centered LLM-Agent User Interface: A Position Paper

Daniel Chin, Yuxuan Wang, Gus Xia

Large Language Model (LLM) -in-the-loop applications have been shown to effectively interpret the human user's commands, make plans, and operate external tools/systems accordingly. Still, the operation scope of the LLM agent is limited to passively following the user, requiring the user to frame his/her needs with regard to the underlying tools/systems. We note that the potential of an LLM-Agent User Interface (LAUI) is much greater. A user mostly ignorant to the underlying tools/systems should be able to work with a LAUI to discover an emergent workflow. Contrary to the conventional way of designing an explorable GUI to teach the user a predefined set of ways to use the system, in the ideal LAUI, the LLM agent is initialized to be proficient with the system, proactively studies the user and his/her needs, and proposes new interaction schemes to the user. To illustrate LAUI, we present Flute X GPT, a concrete example using an LLM agent, a prompt manager, and a flute-tutoring multi-modal software-hardware system to facilitate the complex, real-time user experience of learning to play the flute.

Read more

5/24/2024