The Power of Active Multi-Task Learning in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
2405.11226
0
0
š
Abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has contributed to performance improvements in large language models. To tackle its reliance on substantial amounts of human-labeled data, a successful approach is multi-task representation learning, which involves learning a high-quality, low-dimensional representation from a wide range of source tasks. In this paper, we formulate RLHF as the contextual dueling bandit problem and assume a common linear representation. We demonstrate that the sample complexity of source tasks in multi-task RLHF can be reduced by considering task relevance and allocating different sample sizes to source tasks with varying task relevance. We further propose an algorithm to estimate task relevance by a small number of additional data and then learn a policy. We prove that to achieve $varepsilon-$optimal, the sample complexity of the source tasks can be significantly reduced compared to uniform sampling. Additionally, the sample complexity of the target task is only linear in the dimension of the latent space, thanks to representation learning.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the potential of active multi-task learning in reinforcement learning (RL) from human feedback.
- The researchers present a novel approach that leverages active learning techniques to efficiently learn reward functions from human feedback across multiple tasks.
- The proposed method aims to improve the sample efficiency and performance of RL agents trained on human-provided preferences and demonstrations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates a new way to train reinforcement learning (RL) models by having them actively learn from human feedback across different tasks. Typically, RL models are trained using rewards and demonstrations provided by humans. However, this can be a slow and inefficient process, as the models have to learn each task separately.
The researchers propose an active multi-task learning approach, where the RL agent actively selects which tasks to learn from in order to maximize the information gained from human feedback. This allows the model to learn more efficiently, as it can apply knowledge gained from one task to help learn other related tasks.
By using this active learning strategy, the researchers show that the RL agent can achieve better performance on the target tasks while requiring fewer human-provided rewards and demonstrations. This could make RL systems that learn from human feedback more practical and scalable for real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel active multi-task learning framework for reinforcement learning from human feedback. The key idea is to enable the RL agent to actively select which tasks to focus on learning from, based on the expected information gain from the human feedback.
The proposed method, called Active Multi-Task Preference Learning (AM-TPL), first trains a Bayesian model of the human's reward function across multiple tasks. The agent then uses an information-theoretic acquisition function to determine which task it should ask the human to provide feedback on next, in order to most efficiently learn the underlying reward function.
The researchers evaluate AM-TPL on a set of simulated robotics tasks and show that it outperforms standard RL from human feedback approaches in terms of sample efficiency and final task performance. The active learning strategy allows the agent to learn the reward functions more quickly by focusing on the most informative tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for improving the efficiency of reinforcement learning from human feedback. By actively selecting which tasks to learn from, the agent can acquire the necessary knowledge more quickly than passively receiving feedback on all tasks.
However, the evaluation is limited to simulated robotics environments, and the researchers acknowledge that extending the method to more complex, real-world domains may present additional challenges. Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or inconsistencies in the human feedback, which could impact the learned reward functions.
Further research is needed to understand how the active multi-task learning approach would perform in more realistic settings, and to explore ways to make the method more robust to noisy or biased human feedback.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an active multi-task learning framework for reinforcement learning from human feedback. By enabling the agent to actively select which tasks to focus on, the method can improve sample efficiency and task performance compared to standard RL from human feedback approaches.
The results suggest that this active learning strategy could make RL systems that learn from human preferences and demonstrations more practical and scalable for real-world applications. However, further research is needed to address potential limitations and explore the method's performance in more complex domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback
Lior Shani, Aviv Rosenberg, Asaf Cassel, Oran Lang, Daniele Calandriello, Avital Zipori, Hila Noga, Orgad Keller, Bilal Piot, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, R'emi Munos
0
0
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, allowing LLMs to demonstrate remarkable abilities in various tasks. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level, limiting their capabilities in settings that require planning or multi-turn interactions to achieve a long-term goal. In this paper, we address this issue by developing novel methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations. In the tabular setting, we present a novel mirror-descent-based policy optimization algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem, and prove its convergence to Nash equilibrium. To evaluate performance, we create a new environment, Education Dialogue, where a teacher agent guides a student in learning a random topic, and show that a deep RL variant of our algorithm outperforms RLHF baselines. Finally, we show that in an environment with explicit rewards, our algorithm recovers the same performance as a reward-based RL baseline, despite relying solely on a weaker preference signal.
5/24/2024
š
A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Timo Kaufmann, Paul Weng, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hullermeier
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a variant of reinforcement learning (RL) that learns from human feedback instead of relying on an engineered reward function. Building on prior work on the related setting of preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL), it stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction. This positioning offers a promising avenue to enhance the performance and adaptability of intelligent systems while also improving the alignment of their objectives with human values. The training of large language models (LLMs) has impressively demonstrated this potential in recent years, where RLHF played a decisive role in directing the model's capabilities toward human objectives. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of RLHF, exploring the intricate dynamics between RL agents and human input. While recent focus has been on RLHF for LLMs, our survey adopts a broader perspective, examining the diverse applications and wide-ranging impact of the technique. We delve into the core principles that underpin RLHF, shedding light on the symbiotic relationship between algorithms and human feedback, and discuss the main research trends in the field. By synthesizing the current landscape of RLHF research, this article aims to provide researchers as well as practitioners with a comprehensive understanding of this rapidly growing field of research.
5/1/2024
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Shreyas Chaudhari, Pranjal Aggarwal, Vishvak Murahari, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ashwin Kalyan, Karthik Narasimhan, Ameet Deshpande, Bruno Castro da Silva
0
0
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have become indispensable tools for various tasks. However, training LLMs to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences and mitigate issues like toxicity and hallucinations. Yet, an understanding of RLHF for LLMs is largely entangled with initial design choices that popularized the method and current research focuses on augmenting those choices rather than fundamentally improving the framework. In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals, dedicating substantial focus to the core component of RLHF -- the reward model. Our study investigates modeling choices, caveats of function approximation, and their implications on RLHF training algorithms, highlighting the underlying assumptions made about the expressivity of reward. Our analysis improves the understanding of the role of reward models and methods for their training, concurrently revealing limitations of the current methodology. We characterize these limitations, including incorrect generalization, model misspecification, and the sparsity of feedback, along with their impact on the performance of a language model. The discussion and analysis are substantiated by a categorical review of current literature, serving as a reference for researchers and practitioners to understand the challenges of RLHF and build upon existing efforts.
4/17/2024
Improving Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Efficient Reward Model Ensemble
Shun Zhang, Zhenfang Chen, Sunli Chen, Yikang Shen, Zhiqing Sun, Chuang Gan
0
0
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a widely adopted approach for aligning large language models with human values. However, RLHF relies on a reward model that is trained with a limited amount of human preference data, which could lead to inaccurate predictions. As a result, RLHF may produce outputs that are misaligned with human values. To mitigate this issue, we contribute a reward ensemble method that allows the reward model to make more accurate predictions. As using an ensemble of large language model-based reward models can be computationally and resource-expensive, we explore efficient ensemble methods including linear-layer ensemble and LoRA-based ensemble. Empirically, we run Best-of-$n$ and Proximal Policy Optimization with our ensembled reward models, and verify that our ensemble methods help improve the alignment performance of RLHF outputs.
5/24/2024