Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback
2405.14655
0
0
š
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, allowing LLMs to demonstrate remarkable abilities in various tasks. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level, limiting their capabilities in settings that require planning or multi-turn interactions to achieve a long-term goal. In this paper, we address this issue by developing novel methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations. In the tabular setting, we present a novel mirror-descent-based policy optimization algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem, and prove its convergence to Nash equilibrium. To evaluate performance, we create a new environment, Education Dialogue, where a teacher agent guides a student in learning a random topic, and show that a deep RL variant of our algorithm outperforms RLHF baselines. Finally, we show that in an environment with explicit rewards, our algorithm recovers the same performance as a reward-based RL baseline, despite relying solely on a weaker preference signal.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces novel reinforcement learning (RL) methods that can learn from human preferences over multi-turn conversations, rather than just single decisions.
- This is an important advancement over existing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) approaches, which are limited to learning from feedback on individual actions.
- The new methods are evaluated in a simulated "Education Dialogue" environment, where an AI agent acts as a teacher guiding a student, and are shown to outperform RLHF baselines.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) have become remarkably capable at various tasks, but aligning them with human preferences is an important challenge. Existing RLHF methods try to do this by learning from feedback on individual decisions made by the model.
However, in many real-world situations, achieving a good outcome requires planning and making a series of decisions over multiple steps or "turns." The paper argues that these multi-turn interactions are important, and existing RLHF methods are limited in their ability to learn from them.
To address this, the researchers developed new RL techniques that can learn from human feedback on entire multi-turn conversations, rather than just single decisions. They tested these methods in a simulated "Education Dialogue" scenario, where an AI agent acts as a teacher guiding a student. The new methods outperformed standard RLHF approaches in this environment.
Importantly, the paper also shows that their algorithm can match the performance of traditional reward-based RL, even though it only uses the weaker signal of human preferences, rather than explicit rewards. This suggests the new methods could be a powerful way to align LLMs with what humans actually want, rather than just maximizing some predefined reward function.
Technical Explanation
The core technical contribution of the paper is the development of novel RL algorithms that can learn from human preferences over entire multi-turn conversations, rather than just single decisions.
Specifically, the researchers present a new "mirror-descent-based policy optimization" algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem. They prove that this algorithm converges to a Nash equilibrium in the tabular setting.
To evaluate the performance of their methods, the researchers created a new simulated environment called "Education Dialogue." In this environment, an AI agent plays the role of a teacher, guiding a student to learn a randomly selected topic through a multi-turn dialogue.
The researchers show that a deep RL variant of their algorithm outperforms standard RLHF baselines in this environment. Importantly, they also demonstrate that their algorithm can match the performance of traditional reward-based RL, even when only using the weaker signal of human preferences, rather than explicit rewards.
This suggests the new methods could be a powerful way to learn from human feedback and align LLMs with human preferences, without relying on predefined reward functions that may not capture the full complexity of human values.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising new approach to aligning LLMs with human preferences, but there are a few important caveats and areas for further research:
-
The evaluation is limited to a simulated "Education Dialogue" environment, which may not fully capture the complexity of real-world human-AI interactions. Further testing in more diverse and realistic environments would be valuable.
-
The theoretical analysis is restricted to the tabular setting, which may not directly translate to the deep RL variants used in practice. Extending the theoretical guarantees to the deep learning case would strengthen the claims.
-
The paper does not address how the new methods would scale to the massive language models used in practice, or how they would handle the inherent ambiguity and subjectivity of human preferences.
-
While the ability to match reward-based RL performance using only preference feedback is an impressive result, it's unclear if this would hold true across a wide range of tasks and environments.
Overall, the paper represents an important step forward in the quest to align LLMs with human values, but further research is needed to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of the approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces novel reinforcement learning methods that can learn from human preferences over multi-turn conversations, rather than just single decisions. This is a significant advancement over existing RLHF approaches, which are limited to learning from feedback on individual actions.
The new methods are shown to outperform standard RLHF baselines in a simulated "Education Dialogue" environment, and can even match the performance of traditional reward-based RL, despite using only the weaker signal of human preferences. This suggests the potential for these techniques to provide a powerful way to align large language models with human values, without relying on predefined reward functions.
While the paper has some limitations and areas for further research, it represents an important contribution to the field of AI alignment and the ongoing challenge of ensuring that powerful language models behave in a way that is consistent with human preferences.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Nash Learning from Human Feedback
R'emi Munos, Michal Valko, Daniele Calandriello, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Mark Rowland, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Yunhao Tang, Matthieu Geist, Thomas Mesnard, Andrea Michi, Marco Selvi, Sertan Girgin, Nikola Momchev, Olivier Bachem, Daniel J. Mankowitz, Doina Precup, Bilal Piot
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the main paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Typically, RLHF involves the initial step of learning a reward model from human feedback, often expressed as preferences between pairs of text generations produced by a pre-trained LLM. Subsequently, the LLM's policy is fine-tuned by optimizing it to maximize the reward model through a reinforcement learning algorithm. However, an inherent limitation of current reward models is their inability to fully represent the richness of human preferences and their dependency on the sampling distribution. In this study, we introduce an alternative pipeline for the fine-tuning of LLMs using pairwise human feedback. Our approach entails the initial learning of a preference model, which is conditioned on two inputs given a prompt, followed by the pursuit of a policy that consistently generates responses preferred over those generated by any competing policy, thus defining the Nash equilibrium of this preference model. We term this approach Nash learning from human feedback (NLHF). In the context of a tabular policy representation, we present a novel algorithmic solution, Nash-MD, founded on the principles of mirror descent. This algorithm produces a sequence of policies, with the last iteration converging to the regularized Nash equilibrium. Additionally, we explore parametric representations of policies and introduce gradient descent algorithms for deep-learning architectures. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we present experimental results involving the fine-tuning of a LLM for a text summarization task. We believe NLHF offers a compelling avenue for preference learning and policy optimization with the potential of advancing the field of aligning LLMs with human preferences.
6/12/2024
š
A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Timo Kaufmann, Paul Weng, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hullermeier
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a variant of reinforcement learning (RL) that learns from human feedback instead of relying on an engineered reward function. Building on prior work on the related setting of preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL), it stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction. This positioning offers a promising avenue to enhance the performance and adaptability of intelligent systems while also improving the alignment of their objectives with human values. The training of large language models (LLMs) has impressively demonstrated this potential in recent years, where RLHF played a decisive role in directing the model's capabilities toward human objectives. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of RLHF, exploring the intricate dynamics between RL agents and human input. While recent focus has been on RLHF for LLMs, our survey adopts a broader perspective, examining the diverse applications and wide-ranging impact of the technique. We delve into the core principles that underpin RLHF, shedding light on the symbiotic relationship between algorithms and human feedback, and discuss the main research trends in the field. By synthesizing the current landscape of RLHF research, this article aims to provide researchers as well as practitioners with a comprehensive understanding of this rapidly growing field of research.
5/1/2024
š
Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Model
Chenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang, Nan Jiang, Tong Zhang
0
0
We study Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) under a general preference oracle. In particular, we do not assume that there exists a reward function and the preference signal is drawn from the Bradley-Terry model as most of the prior works do. We consider a standard mathematical formulation, the reverse-KL regularized minimax game between two LLMs for RLHF under general preference oracle. The learning objective of this formulation is to find a policy so that it is consistently preferred by the KL-regularized preference oracle over any competing LLMs. We show that this framework is strictly more general than the reward-based one, and propose sample-efficient algorithms for both the offline learning from a pre-collected preference dataset and online learning where we can query the preference oracle along the way of training. Empirical studies verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
4/26/2024
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Shreyas Chaudhari, Pranjal Aggarwal, Vishvak Murahari, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ashwin Kalyan, Karthik Narasimhan, Ameet Deshpande, Bruno Castro da Silva
0
0
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have become indispensable tools for various tasks. However, training LLMs to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences and mitigate issues like toxicity and hallucinations. Yet, an understanding of RLHF for LLMs is largely entangled with initial design choices that popularized the method and current research focuses on augmenting those choices rather than fundamentally improving the framework. In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals, dedicating substantial focus to the core component of RLHF -- the reward model. Our study investigates modeling choices, caveats of function approximation, and their implications on RLHF training algorithms, highlighting the underlying assumptions made about the expressivity of reward. Our analysis improves the understanding of the role of reward models and methods for their training, concurrently revealing limitations of the current methodology. We characterize these limitations, including incorrect generalization, model misspecification, and the sparsity of feedback, along with their impact on the performance of a language model. The discussion and analysis are substantiated by a categorical review of current literature, serving as a reference for researchers and practitioners to understand the challenges of RLHF and build upon existing efforts.
4/17/2024