Pragmatist Intelligence: Where the Principle of Usefulness Can Take ANNs

Overview

• Artificial neural networks (ANNs) excel at various tasks like classification and prediction, such as speech processing and image classification.
• The paper examines the connection between how ANNs select model parameters and the epistemological theory of neopragmatism, focusing on utility and anti-representationalist aspects.
• The paper suggests using neopragmatist theories to understand the consequences of ANN model parameter selection, as neopragmatism's notion of optimization is also based on utility considerations.
• The paper explores the inherent connections between optimization in machine learning (ML), numerical methods during the learning phase, and optimization in the ethical theory of consequentialism.

Plain English Explanation

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are a type of machine learning model that can perform exceptionally well on tasks like speech processing and image classification. These models are able to freely select all the necessary internal parameters to deliver the desired functionality.

The paper examines the relationship between how these ANN models select their parameters and the philosophical theory of neopragmatism. Neopragmatism is a perspective that focuses on the practical utility and usefulness of knowledge, rather than on accurately representing reality. The paper suggests that using neopragmatist ideas can help us understand the consequences of how ANNs choose their parameters, as neopragmatism also emphasizes optimization based on utility considerations.

Importantly, the paper finds that the way ANNs optimize their parameters during the learning process is closely connected to the ethical theory of consequentialism, which also focuses on optimizing actions based on their outcomes and utility. The paper proposes that these connections arise from how relevance is calculated in ML systems, and this could reveal tendencies for specific actions in ANN-based systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the connection between how artificial neural networks (ANNs) select their internal model parameters and the epistemological theory of neopragmatism. ANNs are a type of machine learning model that can excel at a variety of tasks, including classification and prediction.

The authors suggest that using neopragmatist theories, which focus on the utility and anti-representationalist aspects of knowledge, can help reveal the consequences of how ANNs choose their model parameters. Neopragmatism's notion of optimization is also based on utility considerations, similar to the optimization that occurs in machine learning during the training phase.

The paper explores the inherent connections between this optimization in ML, using numerical methods during the learning phase, and the optimization in the ethical theory of consequentialism, where it is a central principle. The authors propose that these connections arise from how relevance is calculated in ML systems, and this could ultimately uncover tendencies for specific actions in ANN-based systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides an interesting perspective on the connections between machine learning, specifically ANNs, and philosophical theories like neopragmatism and consequentialism. By exploring these connections, the authors aim to shed light on the consequences of how ANNs select their model parameters.

One potential limitation of the research is that it does not delve deeply into empirical validation of the proposed connections. The paper remains largely conceptual and theoretical, relying on the existing literature on neopragmatism and consequentialism to make its arguments. Further research could explore more concrete examples or case studies to substantiate the claims made in the paper.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues or ethical concerns that may arise from the inherent connections between ML optimization and consequentialist ethical principles. As AI-powered systems become more prevalent, it will be crucial to carefully examine the implications of these connections and ensure that the actions taken by ANN-based systems align with ethical frameworks that go beyond just optimization based on utility.

Conclusion

This paper presents a thought-provoking exploration of the connections between the internal parameter selection of artificial neural networks and the epistemological theory of neopragmatism, as well as the ethical theory of consequentialism. By highlighting these connections, the authors suggest that using neopragmatist ideas can provide valuable insights into the consequences of how ANNs choose their model parameters.

The paper's main contribution is in drawing these conceptual links and encouraging further research to empirically validate and explore the implications of these connections. As AI models become more ubiquitous, understanding the ethical and philosophical underpinnings of their decision-making processes will be crucial for ensuring these systems are aligned with societal values and beneficial to humanity.