Predictive change point detection for heterogeneous data
0
🔎
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a change point detection (CPD) framework called Predict and Compare that outperforms other state-of-the-art online CPD methods
- Focuses on improving standard sequential analysis methods like the CUSUM rule by using more sophisticated predictive models
- Demonstrates the power of the method in a tribological case study detecting change points with very few false positives
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new approach for detecting changes or "change points" in time-series data. Change point detection is important in many applications, such as monitoring industrial processes or analyzing physiological signals.
The key idea behind the "Predict and Compare" method is to use a predictive machine learning model to forecast what the data should look like, and then compare that prediction to the actual data. If there is a big difference between the prediction and the real data, that could indicate a change point has occurred.
The authors tested two different predictive models - an ARIMA model and an LSTM neural network. These models are used in the "Predict" step to forecast the data. In the "Compare" step, the predicted values are compared to the actual observed data. This approach allows the method to detect changes more accurately than standard techniques, with fewer false positives.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a case study involving tribological (friction and wear) data, where it was able to identify key transitions like the run-in, steady-state, and divergent wear phases with very high precision.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a change point detection (CPD) framework called "Predict and Compare" that leverages predictive machine learning models to improve on standard sequential analysis techniques like the CUSUM rule.
The core idea is to replace the typically used trend estimation functions (like the running mean) with more sophisticated predictive models in a two-step process:
- Predict: Use an ARIMA model or an LSTM recurrent neural network to forecast the future values of the time series.
- Compare: Compare the predicted values to the actual observed data. Large deviations between the prediction and reality may indicate a change point has occurred.
By using more powerful predictive models, the method is able to better detect changes in the data, as demonstrated by its superior performance in terms of false positive rate and out-of-control average run length compared to other state-of-the-art online CPD methods.
The authors test their framework on a tribological case study, where it is able to accurately identify key transitions like the run-in, steady-state, and divergent wear phases with very few false positives. This capability could be valuable for monitoring industrial processes or detecting changes in remote sensing data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a clear and thorough explanation of the Predict and Compare framework, including details on the predictive models used and the evaluation metrics. However, it does not delve deeply into the limitations or potential drawbacks of the approach.
One potential concern is the computational complexity and training time required for the predictive models, especially the LSTM. This could make the method challenging to apply in real-time or resource-constrained scenarios. The paper also does not address how the framework might perform on high-dimensional, multivariate time series data, which is common in many real-world applications.
Additionally, the authors only tested their method on a single case study. While this demonstrates the potential of the approach, further evaluation on a wider range of datasets and applications would be beneficial to fully assess its strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, the Predict and Compare framework represents an interesting and promising direction for improving change point detection. However, more research is needed to better understand its limitations and potential areas for further refinement.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel change point detection framework called Predict and Compare that leverages predictive machine learning models to outperform standard sequential analysis techniques. By using more sophisticated forecasting methods in a two-step process of prediction and comparison, the approach is able to detect changes in time-series data with fewer false positives.
The demonstrated success of the method on a tribological case study suggests it could be a valuable tool for monitoring industrial processes, analyzing physiological signals, or detecting changes in remote sensing data. Further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and potential refinements of the Predict and Compare framework, but overall, it represents an exciting advancement in the field of change point detection.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
0
Predictive change point detection for heterogeneous data
Anna-Christina Glock, Florian Sobieczky, Johannes Furnkranz, Peter Filzmoser, Martin Jech
A change point detection (CPD) framework assisted by a predictive machine learning model called Predict and Compare is introduced and characterised in relation to other state-of-the-art online CPD routines which it outperforms in terms of false positive rate and out-of-control average run length. The method's focus is on improving standard methods from sequential analysis such as the CUSUM rule in terms of these quality measures. This is achieved by replacing typically used trend estimation functionals such as the running mean with more sophisticated predictive models (Predict step), and comparing their prognosis with actual data (Compare step). The two models used in the Predict step are the ARIMA model and the LSTM recursive neural network. However, the framework is formulated in general terms, so as to allow the use of other prediction or comparison methods than those tested here. The power of the method is demonstrated in a tribological case study in which change points separating the run-in, steady-state, and divergent wear phases are detected in the regime of very few false positives.
Read more5/6/2024
0
Anomalous Change Point Detection Using Probabilistic Predictive Coding
Roelof G. Hup, Julian P. Merkofer, Alex A. Bhogal, Ruud J. G. van Sloun, Reinder Haakma, Rik Vullings
Change point detection (CPD) and anomaly detection (AD) are essential techniques in various fields to identify abrupt changes or abnormal data instances. However, existing methods are often constrained to univariate data, face scalability challenges with large datasets due to computational demands, and experience reduced performance with high-dimensional or intricate data, as well as hidden anomalies. Furthermore, they often lack interpretability and adaptability to domain-specific knowledge, which limits their versatility across different fields. In this work, we propose a deep learning-based CPD/AD method called Probabilistic Predictive Coding (PPC) that jointly learns to encode sequential data to low dimensional latent space representations and to predict the subsequent data representations as well as the corresponding prediction uncertainties. The model parameters are optimized with maximum likelihood estimation by comparing these predictions with the true encodings. At the time of application, the true and predicted encodings are used to determine the probability of conformity, an interpretable and meaningful anomaly score. Furthermore, our approach has linear time complexity, scalability issues are prevented, and the method can easily be adjusted to a wide range of data types and intricate applications. We demonstrate the effectiveness and adaptability of our proposed method across synthetic time series experiments, image data, and real-world magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging data.
Read more5/27/2024
🔎
0
Causal Discovery-Driven Change Point Detection in Time Series
Shanyun Gao, Raghavendra Addanki, Tong Yu, Ryan A. Rossi, Murat Kocaoglu
Change point detection in time series seeks to identify times when the probability distribution of time series changes. It is widely applied in many areas, such as human-activity sensing and medical science. In the context of multivariate time series, this typically involves examining the joint distribution of high-dimensional data: If any one variable changes, the whole time series is assumed to have changed. However, in practical applications, we may be interested only in certain components of the time series, exploring abrupt changes in their distributions in the presence of other time series. Here, assuming an underlying structural causal model that governs the time-series data generation, we address this problem by proposing a two-stage non-parametric algorithm that first learns parts of the causal structure through constraint-based discovery methods. The algorithm then uses conditional relative Pearson divergence estimation to identify the change points. The conditional relative Pearson divergence quantifies the distribution disparity between consecutive segments in the time series, while the causal discovery method enables a focus on the causal mechanism, facilitating access to independent and identically distributed (IID) samples. Theoretically, the typical assumption of samples being IID in conventional change point detection methods can be relaxed based on the Causal Markov Condition. Through experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, we validate the correctness and utility of our approach.
Read more7/11/2024
0
Benchmarking changepoint detection algorithms on cardiac time series
Ayse Cakmak, Erik Reinertsen, Shamim Nemati, Gari D. Clifford
The pattern of state changes in a biomedical time series can be related to health or disease. This work presents a principled approach for selecting a changepoint detection algorithm for a specific task, such as disease classification. Eight key algorithms were compared, and the performance of each algorithm was evaluated as a function of temporal tolerance, noise, and abnormal conduction (ectopy) on realistic artificial cardiovascular time series data. All algorithms were applied to real data (cardiac time series of 22 patients with REM-behavior disorder (RBD) and 15 healthy controls) using the parameters selected on artificial data. Finally, features were derived from the detected changepoints to classify RBD patients from healthy controls using a K-Nearest Neighbors approach. On artificial data, Modified Bayesian Changepoint Detection algorithm provided superior positive predictive value for state change identification while Recursive Mean Difference Maximization (RMDM) achieved the highest true positive rate. For the classification task, features derived from the RMDM algorithm provided the highest leave one out cross validated accuracy of 0.89 and true positive rate of 0.87. Automatically detected changepoints provide useful information about subject's physiological state which cannot be directly observed. However, the choice of change point detection algorithm depends on the nature of the underlying data and the downstream application, such as a classification task. This work represents the first time change point detection algorithms have been compared in a meaningful way and utilized in a classification task, which demonstrates the effect of changepoint algorithm choice on application performance.
Read more4/22/2024