Preference-Based Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning (with-Appendix)
0
➖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The document provides formatting instructions for submissions to the KR2024 conference.
- It covers guidelines related to paper length, word processing software, and other technical details.
Plain English Explanation
The KR2024 Formatting Instructions outline the requirements for submitting papers to the KR2024 conference. The main points covered include:
- Length of Papers: Papers should be no more than 8 pages long, including references and appendices.
- Word Processing Software: Authors should use LaTeX or Microsoft Word to prepare their submissions. Specific formatting requirements are provided for each software.
The instructions aim to ensure a consistent format across all submissions, which helps the conference organizers and reviewers efficiently process the papers.
Technical Explanation
The KR2024 Formatting Instructions provide detailed guidelines for preparing conference submissions.
For paper length, authors are instructed to limit their papers to a maximum of 8 pages, including references and any appendices. This page limit helps to ensure that all submissions can be thoroughly reviewed within the conference timeline.
In terms of word processing software, the instructions specify that authors should use either LaTeX or Microsoft Word to format their papers. Specific formatting requirements are provided for each software, such as font sizes, margins, and citation styles. These guidelines help to maintain a consistent look and feel across all accepted papers.
Critical Analysis
The formatting instructions appear to be comprehensive and well-thought-out, addressing the key technical requirements for submitting papers to the KR2024 conference. The page limit and software guidelines are common practices in academic conferences, helping to streamline the review process and ensure a level playing field for all authors.
However, the instructions do not provide any guidance on the content or structure of the papers themselves. While formatting is important, the quality and significance of the research are ultimately more crucial for acceptance. It would be helpful if the instructions also offered advice on crafting an effective paper structure or addressing common reviewer concerns.
Additionally, the instructions could be improved by providing more context on the conference's goals, themes, or areas of interest. This additional information would help authors align their submissions more closely with the conference's priorities.
Conclusion
The KR2024 Formatting Instructions outline the technical requirements for submitting papers to the upcoming KR2024 conference. By providing clear guidelines on paper length and formatting, the instructions aim to ensure a consistent and efficient review process for all submissions.
While the formatting details are important, the quality and significance of the research are ultimately the most critical factors for acceptance. Future iterations of the instructions could be strengthened by incorporating more guidance on the content and structure of effective conference papers, as well as additional context on the conference's overall goals and priorities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
➖
0
Preference-Based Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning (with-Appendix)
Adam Gould, Guilherme Paulino-Passos, Seema Dadhania, Matthew Williams, Francesca Toni
In the pursuit of enhancing the efficacy and flexibility of interpretable, data-driven classification models, this work introduces a novel incorporation of user-defined preferences with Abstract Argumentation and Case-Based Reasoning (CBR). Specifically, we introduce Preference-Based Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning (which we call AA-CBR-P), allowing users to define multiple approaches to compare cases with an ordering that specifies their preference over these comparison approaches. We prove that the model inherently follows these preferences when making predictions and show that previous abstract argumentation for case-based reasoning approaches are insufficient at expressing preferences over constituents of an argument. We then demonstrate how this can be applied to a real-world medical dataset sourced from a clinical trial evaluating differing assessment methods of patients with a primary brain tumour. We show empirically that our approach outperforms other interpretable machine learning models on this dataset.
Read more8/2/2024
🔄
0
Learning Brave Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks via ASP
Emanuele De Angelis (CNR-IASI, Rome, Italy), Maurizio Proietti (CNR-IASI, Rome, Italy), Francesca Toni (Imperial, London, UK)
Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) is advocated as a unifying formalism for various forms of non-monotonic reasoning, including logic programming. It allows capturing defeasible knowledge, subject to argumentative debate. While, in much existing work, ABA frameworks are given up-front, in this paper we focus on the problem of automating their learning from background knowledge and positive/negative examples. Unlike prior work, we newly frame the problem in terms of brave reasoning under stable extensions for ABA. We present a novel algorithm based on transformation rules (such as Rote Learning, Folding, Assumption Introduction and Fact Subsumption) and an implementation thereof that makes use of Answer Set Programming. Finally, we compare our technique to state-of-the-art ILP systems that learn defeasible knowledge.
Read more8/20/2024
0
A Case-Based Persistent Memory for a Large Language Model
Ian Watson
Case-based reasoning (CBR) as a methodology for problem-solving can use any appropriate computational technique. This position paper argues that CBR researchers have somewhat overlooked recent developments in deep learning and large language models (LLMs). The underlying technical developments that have enabled the recent breakthroughs in AI have strong synergies with CBR and could be used to provide a persistent memory for LLMs to make progress towards Artificial General Intelligence.
Read more5/8/2024
🌐
0
Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Solving Financial Question Answering
Yikyung Kim, Jay-Yoon Lee
Measuring a machine's understanding of human language often involves assessing its reasoning skills, i.e. logical process of deriving answers to questions. While recent language models have shown remarkable proficiency in text based tasks, their efficacy in complex reasoning problems involving heterogeneous information such as text, tables, and numbers remain uncertain. Addressing this gap, FinQA introduced a numerical reasoning dataset for financial documents and simultaneously proposed a program generation approach . Our investigation reveals that half of the errors (48%) stem from incorrect operations being generated. To address this issue, we propose a novel approach to tackle numerical reasoning problems using case based reasoning (CBR), an artificial intelligence paradigm that provides problem solving guidance by offering similar cases (i.e. similar questions and corresponding logical programs). Our model retrieves relevant cases to address a given question, and then generates an answer based on the retrieved cases and contextual information. Through experiments on the FinQA dataset, we demonstrate competitive performance of our approach and additionally show that by expanding case repository, we can help solving complex multi step programs which FinQA showed weakness of.
Read more5/24/2024