Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Solving Financial Question Answering

Read original: arXiv:2405.13044 - Published 5/24/2024 by Yikyung Kim, Jay-Yoon Lee
Total Score

0

🌐

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Measuring a machine's understanding of human language often involves assessing its reasoning skills, i.e. the logical process of deriving answers to questions.
  • Recent language models have shown remarkable proficiency in text-based tasks, but their efficacy in complex reasoning problems involving heterogeneous information like text, tables, and numbers remains uncertain.
  • The FinQA dataset introduced a numerical reasoning task for financial documents and proposed a program generation approach to address it.
  • The study found that half of the errors (48%) were due to incorrect operations being generated.
  • To address this issue, the researchers propose a novel approach using case-based reasoning (CBR), an AI paradigm that provides problem-solving guidance by offering similar cases (i.e., similar questions and corresponding logical programs).

Plain English Explanation

Machines can understand human language quite well these days, but they still struggle with more complex reasoning tasks that involve different types of information, like text, tables, and numbers. The FinQA dataset was created to test how well machines can do numerical reasoning on financial documents.

The researchers found that a major problem with the existing approaches was that the machines were generating incorrect mathematical operations when trying to answer the questions. To fix this, the researchers developed a new method that uses case-based reasoning (CBR). This means the machine looks for similar questions it has seen before and uses the solutions to those previous cases to help it answer the new question.

By expanding the machine's "memory" of past cases, the researchers were able to improve the machine's performance on these complex, multi-step reasoning problems, which was a weakness of the previous approaches. The key idea is to provide the machine with more examples of how to solve these types of problems, so it can learn from them and apply that knowledge to new questions.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel approach to tackle numerical reasoning problems using case-based reasoning (CBR), an AI paradigm that provides problem-solving guidance by offering similar cases (i.e., similar questions and corresponding logical programs). The model retrieves relevant cases to address a given question and then generates an answer based on the retrieved cases and contextual information.

The researchers conducted experiments on the FinQA dataset, which was introduced to benchmark numerical reasoning on financial documents. The results demonstrate the competitive performance of the CBR-based approach, and the researchers show that by expanding the case repository, the model can better solve complex, multi-step programs, which was a weakness of the previous program generation approach proposed for FinQA.

Critical Analysis

The paper's focus on addressing the issue of incorrect operations being generated is a valuable contribution, as this was a significant source of errors in the previous program generation approach. The CBR-based method provides a promising alternative that leverages the guidance of similar past cases to improve the model's reasoning abilities.

However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the types of cases or the case retrieval mechanism used in the CBR model. More information on how the case base is constructed and how relevant cases are identified would help readers better understand the strengths and limitations of the approach.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the scalability of the CBR-based method, particularly as the case repository grows. Reasoning as Retrieval (RAR-B) and CuriousLLM are related approaches that may offer insights into scaling case-based reasoning systems.

Overall, the proposed CBR-based method shows promise in addressing the limitations of previous program generation approaches for numerical reasoning on financial documents. Further research on the specifics of the case-based reasoning system and its scalability could help strengthen the contributions of this work.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to numerical reasoning on financial documents, addressing the issue of incorrect operations being generated by previous methods. The researchers propose a case-based reasoning (CBR) model that retrieves and leverages similar past cases to guide the generation of logical programs for answering questions.

The results demonstrate the competitive performance of the CBR-based approach and its ability to better solve complex, multi-step reasoning problems compared to the previous program generation method. This work highlights the potential of case-based reasoning techniques to enhance the reasoning capabilities of language models, particularly in domains that require processing heterogeneous information and performing complex logical inferences.

As the field of numerical reasoning continues to evolve, this research contributes a promising direction for further exploration and refinement of case-based reasoning approaches to address the challenges in this important area of natural language understanding.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌐

Total Score

0

Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Solving Financial Question Answering

Yikyung Kim, Jay-Yoon Lee

Measuring a machine's understanding of human language often involves assessing its reasoning skills, i.e. logical process of deriving answers to questions. While recent language models have shown remarkable proficiency in text based tasks, their efficacy in complex reasoning problems involving heterogeneous information such as text, tables, and numbers remain uncertain. Addressing this gap, FinQA introduced a numerical reasoning dataset for financial documents and simultaneously proposed a program generation approach . Our investigation reveals that half of the errors (48%) stem from incorrect operations being generated. To address this issue, we propose a novel approach to tackle numerical reasoning problems using case based reasoning (CBR), an artificial intelligence paradigm that provides problem solving guidance by offering similar cases (i.e. similar questions and corresponding logical programs). Our model retrieves relevant cases to address a given question, and then generates an answer based on the retrieved cases and contextual information. Through experiments on the FinQA dataset, we demonstrate competitive performance of our approach and additionally show that by expanding case repository, we can help solving complex multi step programs which FinQA showed weakness of.

Read more

5/24/2024

FormulaReasoning: A Dataset for Formula-Based Numerical Reasoning
Total Score

0

FormulaReasoning: A Dataset for Formula-Based Numerical Reasoning

Xiao Li, Bolin Zhu, Sichen Liu, Yin Zhu, Yiwei Liu, Gong Cheng

The application of formulas is a fundamental ability of humans when addressing numerical reasoning problems. However, existing numerical reasoning datasets seldom explicitly indicate the formulas employed during the reasoning steps. To bridge this gap, we construct a dataset for formula-based numerical reasoning called FormulaReasoning, which consists of 5,420 reasoning-based questions. We employ it to conduct evaluations of LLMs with size ranging from 7B to over 100B parameters utilizing zero-shot and few-shot chain-of-thought methods, and we further explore using retrieval-augmented LLMs provided with an external formula database associated with our dataset. We also experiment with supervised methods where we divide the reasoning process into formula generation, parameter extraction, and numerical calculation, and perform data augmentation. Our empirical findings underscore the significant potential for improvement in existing models when applied to our complex, formula-driven FormulaReasoning.

Read more

6/13/2024

Fine-tuning Smaller Language Models for Question Answering over Financial Documents
Total Score

0

Fine-tuning Smaller Language Models for Question Answering over Financial Documents

Karmvir Singh Phogat, Sai Akhil Puranam, Sridhar Dasaratha, Chetan Harsha, Shashishekar Ramakrishna

Recent research has shown that smaller language models can acquire substantial reasoning abilities when fine-tuned with reasoning exemplars crafted by a significantly larger teacher model. We explore this paradigm for the financial domain, focusing on the challenge of answering questions that require multi-hop numerical reasoning over financial texts. We assess the performance of several smaller models that have been fine-tuned to generate programs that encode the required financial reasoning and calculations. Our findings demonstrate that these fine-tuned smaller models approach the performance of the teacher model. To provide a granular analysis of model performance, we propose an approach to investigate the specific student model capabilities that are enhanced by fine-tuning. Our empirical analysis indicates that fine-tuning refines the student models ability to express and apply the required financial concepts along with adapting the entity extraction for the specific data format. In addition, we hypothesize and demonstrate that comparable financial reasoning capability can be induced using relatively smaller datasets.

Read more

8/23/2024

Are LLMs Capable of Data-based Statistical and Causal Reasoning? Benchmarking Advanced Quantitative Reasoning with Data
Total Score

0

Are LLMs Capable of Data-based Statistical and Causal Reasoning? Benchmarking Advanced Quantitative Reasoning with Data

Xiao Liu, Zirui Wu, Xueqing Wu, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Yansong Feng

Quantitative reasoning is a critical skill to analyze data, yet the assessment of such ability remains limited. To address this gap, we introduce the Quantitative Reasoning with Data (QRData) benchmark, aiming to evaluate Large Language Models' capability in statistical and causal reasoning with real-world data. The benchmark comprises a carefully constructed dataset of 411 questions accompanied by data sheets from textbooks, online learning materials, and academic papers. To compare models' quantitative reasoning abilities on data and text, we enrich the benchmark with an auxiliary set of 290 text-only questions, namely QRText. We evaluate natural language reasoning, program-based reasoning, and agent reasoning methods including Chain-of-Thought, Program-of-Thoughts, ReAct, and code interpreter assistants on diverse models. The strongest model GPT-4 achieves an accuracy of 58%, which has much room for improvement. Among open-source models, Deepseek-coder-instruct, a code LLM pretrained on 2T tokens, gets the highest accuracy of 37%. Analysis reveals that models encounter difficulties in data analysis and causal reasoning, and struggle in using causal knowledge and provided data simultaneously. Code and data are in https://github.com/xxxiaol/QRData.

Read more

6/11/2024