Private Geometric Median

Overview

• This paper investigates differentially private (DP) algorithms for computing the geometric median (GM) of a dataset.
• The geometric median is a central point that minimizes the sum of Euclidean distances to all the data points.
• Existing DP-GD methods require strong prior knowledge about the data's location, and their excess error scales linearly with the data's radius.
• The paper aims to design efficient and private algorithms with excess error scaling with the effective diameter of the data, which is unknown.

Plain English Explanation

The geometric median is like finding the central point in a group of locations that has the shortest total distance to all the other locations. Imagine a bunch of cities on a map, and you want to find the city that's closest to all the other cities on average.

Existing private algorithms for computing the geometric median require you to know ahead of time how far the data points are spread out. This means you need to know the maximum distance between any data point and the central point. The performance of these algorithms gets worse as this maximum distance increases.

This paper tries to develop new private algorithms that can compute the geometric median without needing to know how spread out the data is ahead of time. The key idea is to design algorithms whose error scales with the actual spread of the data, rather than the maximum possible spread. This can lead to much better performance when the data is concentrated in a smaller region.

The paper presents a few new private algorithms for computing the geometric median, and also shows that these algorithms are optimal in terms of the number of data points needed to achieve a certain level of accuracy.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies the problem of privately estimating the geometric median of a dataset. Given $n$ points $x_1, \dots, x_n$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the goal is to find a point $\theta$ that minimizes the sum of the Euclidean distances to these points, i.e., $\sum_{i=1}^{n} |\theta - x_i|_2$.

The authors first observe that off-the-shelf methods, such as DP-GD, require strong a priori knowledge about the location of the data within a ball of radius $R$. The excess risk of these algorithms depends linearly on $R$, which can be problematic if the true radius containing the majority of the data points is much smaller.

To address this limitation, the main contributions of the paper are:

1. A pair of polynomial-time DP algorithms for private geometric median estimation, with excess error guarantees that scale with the effective diameter of the datapoints, rather than the maximum radius.
2. An inefficient algorithm based on the inverse smooth sensitivity mechanism, which satisfies the more restrictive notion of pure DP.
3. A lower bound that demonstrates the optimality of the polynomial-time algorithms in terms of sample complexity.

The key ideas behind the polynomial-time algorithms are to privately estimate the center of mass of the dataset, and then use this estimate as a starting point for a private gradient descent procedure.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes an important contribution by addressing the limitations of existing DP algorithms for geometric median estimation, which require strong prior knowledge about the data distribution. The proposed algorithms are able to achieve excess error guarantees that scale with the effective diameter of the data, rather than the maximum possible radius.

One potential limitation is that the polynomial-time algorithms still require some prior knowledge about the data, specifically a bound on the effective diameter. While this is a weaker assumption than knowing the maximum radius, it may still be challenging to obtain in practice. The authors do present an inefficient algorithm that satisfies the more restrictive notion of pure DP, but its practical applicability may be limited.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the geometric median as the target parameter, but it would be interesting to see if similar techniques can be applied to other centrality measures, such as the trimmed mean or the spatial median.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of private data analysis, and the proposed algorithms could have important applications in areas where preserving user privacy is crucial.

Conclusion

This paper introduces new differentially private algorithms for computing the geometric median of a dataset, which is a central point that minimizes the sum of distances to all the data points. The key innovation is that the excess error of the proposed algorithms scales with the effective diameter of the data, rather than the maximum possible radius, which can lead to significantly better performance when the data is concentrated in a smaller region.

The paper presents a technical analysis of the proposed algorithms, including their optimality in terms of sample complexity, as well as a critical discussion of their limitations and potential extensions. Overall, this work advances the state of the art in private data analysis and could have important implications for applications where preserving user privacy is a key concern.