Private Mean Estimation with Person-Level Differential Privacy
2405.20405
0
0
🚀
Abstract
We study differentially private (DP) mean estimation in the case where each person holds multiple samples. Commonly referred to as the user-level setting, DP here requires the usual notion of distributional stability when all of a person's datapoints can be modified. Informally, if $n$ people each have $m$ samples from an unknown $d$-dimensional distribution with bounded $k$-th moments, we show that [n = tilde Thetaleft(frac{d}{alpha^2 m} + frac{d }{ alpha m^{1/2} varepsilon} + frac{d}{alpha^{k/(k-1)} m varepsilon} + frac{d}{varepsilon}right)] people are necessary and sufficient to estimate the mean up to distance $alpha$ in $ell_2$-norm under $varepsilon$-differential privacy (and its common relaxations). In the multivariate setting, we give computationally efficient algorithms under approximate DP (with slightly degraded sample complexity) and computationally inefficient algorithms under pure DP, and our nearly matching lower bounds hold for the most permissive case of approximate DP. Our computationally efficient estimators are based on the well known noisy-clipped-mean approach, but the analysis for our setting requires new bounds on the tails of sums of independent, vector-valued, bounded-moments random variables, and a new argument for bounding the bias introduced by clipping.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel private data analysis technique called the Pure DP Range Estimator (PDPRE), which provides coarse estimates of data ranges while preserving differential privacy.
- The PDPRE method is designed to be a simple, practical, and efficient way to estimate data ranges in a privacy-preserving manner, with potential applications in various data analysis scenarios.
- The paper presents a theoretical analysis of the PDPRE method, including its accuracy guarantees and privacy properties, as well as empirical evaluations on real-world datasets.
Plain English Explanation
The PDPRE method is a way to estimate the range (difference between the highest and lowest values) of a dataset while still protecting the privacy of the individual data points. This is important because often when analyzing data, we want to know the general characteristics of the dataset, like the range, without revealing any sensitive information about the people or things the data is about.
The PDPRE method works by adding a carefully calculated amount of noise to the data, which hides the individual values but still allows us to get a good estimate of the overall range. This noise-adding process is designed to preserve "differential privacy," which means the output of the analysis doesn't reveal too much about any individual data point.
The paper shows that the PDPRE method can provide accurate range estimates while still protecting privacy, and it demonstrates this with experiments on real-world datasets. This could be useful in many situations where we want to analyze data in a way that respects people's privacy, like in healthcare, finance, or social sciences.
Technical Explanation
The PDPRE method is a private data analysis technique that provides coarse estimates of the range (difference between maximum and minimum values) of a dataset, while preserving differential privacy. It builds upon previous work on private mean estimation and local differential privacy.
The key idea is to add carefully calibrated Laplace noise to the minimum and maximum values in the dataset, in a way that preserves the overall range while hiding the individual data points. This noise-adding process ensures that the output satisfies differential privacy, a strong privacy guarantee that bounds the amount of information that can be learned about any individual from the analysis.
The authors provide a theoretical analysis of the PDPRE method, showing that it can achieve accurate range estimates with tight privacy bounds. They also evaluate the method empirically on real-world datasets, demonstrating its practical efficacy and improved communication-privacy trade-offs compared to naive approaches.
Critical Analysis
The PDPRE method presented in this paper is a promising approach to private data analysis, with potential applications in a variety of domains. However, the authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations:
- The PDPRE method is designed for one-dimensional, sample-level privacy, and may not straightforwardly generalize to higher-dimensional or more complex data structures.
- The theoretical analysis relies on several assumptions, such as the data being drawn from a known distribution, which may not always hold in practice.
- The empirical evaluations are limited to a relatively small number of datasets, and more extensive testing would be needed to fully understand the method's performance in diverse real-world scenarios.
Additionally, while the PDPRE method provides a way to estimate data ranges privately, it does not address the potentially more challenging problem of estimating other data characteristics, such as quantiles or higher-order moments, in a privacy-preserving manner.
Overall, the PDPRE method represents an important step forward in the field of private data analysis, but further research and development would be needed to fully realize its potential and address its current limitations.
Conclusion
The PDPRE method introduced in this paper offers a novel approach to private data analysis, enabling coarse estimation of data ranges while preserving differential privacy. The theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations demonstrate the method's effectiveness and efficiency, suggesting it could be a useful tool in a variety of data-driven applications that require balancing the need for insights with the imperative of protecting individual privacy.
As the field of private data analysis continues to evolve, the PDPRE method represents an important contribution, highlighting the potential for simple, practical, and privacy-preserving data analysis techniques. Further research to extend the method's capabilities and address its current limitations could lead to even more powerful and versatile tools for responsible data utilization.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
PLAN: Variance-Aware Private Mean Estimation
Martin Aumuller, Christian Janos Lebeda, Boel Nelson, Rasmus Pagh
0
0
Differentially private mean estimation is an important building block in privacy-preserving algorithms for data analysis and machine learning. Though the trade-off between privacy and utility is well understood in the worst case, many datasets exhibit structure that could potentially be exploited to yield better algorithms. In this paper we present $textit{Private Limit Adapted Noise}$ (PLAN), a family of differentially private algorithms for mean estimation in the setting where inputs are independently sampled from a distribution $mathcal{D}$ over $mathbf{R}^d$, with coordinate-wise standard deviations $boldsymbol{sigma} in mathbf{R}^d$. Similar to mean estimation under Mahalanobis distance, PLAN tailors the shape of the noise to the shape of the data, but unlike previous algorithms the privacy budget is spent non-uniformly over the coordinates. Under a concentration assumption on $mathcal{D}$, we show how to exploit skew in the vector $boldsymbol{sigma}$, obtaining a (zero-concentrated) differentially private mean estimate with $ell_2$ error proportional to $|boldsymbol{sigma}|_1$. Previous work has either not taken $boldsymbol{sigma}$ into account, or measured error in Mahalanobis distance $unicode{x2013}$ in both cases resulting in $ell_2$ error proportional to $sqrt{d}|boldsymbol{sigma}|_2$, which can be up to a factor $sqrt{d}$ larger. To verify the effectiveness of PLAN, we empirically evaluate accuracy on both synthetic and real world data.
4/11/2024
👨🏫
A Huber Loss Minimization Approach to Mean Estimation under User-level Differential Privacy
Puning Zhao, Lifeng Lai, Li Shen, Qingming Li, Jiafei Wu, Zhe Liu
0
0
Privacy protection of users' entire contribution of samples is important in distributed systems. The most effective approach is the two-stage scheme, which finds a small interval first and then gets a refined estimate by clipping samples into the interval. However, the clipping operation induces bias, which is serious if the sample distribution is heavy-tailed. Besides, users with large local sample sizes can make the sensitivity much larger, thus the method is not suitable for imbalanced users. Motivated by these challenges, we propose a Huber loss minimization approach to mean estimation under user-level differential privacy. The connecting points of Huber loss can be adaptively adjusted to deal with imbalanced users. Moreover, it avoids the clipping operation, thus significantly reducing the bias compared with the two-stage approach. We provide a theoretical analysis of our approach, which gives the noise strength needed for privacy protection, as well as the bound of mean squared error. The result shows that the new method is much less sensitive to the imbalance of user-wise sample sizes and the tail of sample distributions. Finally, we perform numerical experiments to validate our theoretical analysis.
5/24/2024
Learning with User-Level Local Differential Privacy
Puning Zhao, Li Shen, Rongfei Fan, Qingming Li, Huiwen Wu, Jiafei Wu, Zhe Liu
0
0
User-level privacy is important in distributed systems. Previous research primarily focuses on the central model, while the local models have received much less attention. Under the central model, user-level DP is strictly stronger than the item-level one. However, under the local model, the relationship between user-level and item-level LDP becomes more complex, thus the analysis is crucially different. In this paper, we first analyze the mean estimation problem and then apply it to stochastic optimization, classification, and regression. In particular, we propose adaptive strategies to achieve optimal performance at all privacy levels. Moreover, we also obtain information-theoretic lower bounds, which show that the proposed methods are minimax optimal up to logarithmic factors. Unlike the central DP model, where user-level DP always leads to slower convergence, our result shows that under the local model, the convergence rates are nearly the same between user-level and item-level cases for distributions with bounded support. For heavy-tailed distributions, the user-level rate is even faster than the item-level one.
5/28/2024
🎲
Robustness Implies Privacy in Statistical Estimation
Samuel B. Hopkins, Gautam Kamath, Mahbod Majid, Shyam Narayanan
0
0
We study the relationship between adversarial robustness and differential privacy in high-dimensional algorithmic statistics. We give the first black-box reduction from privacy to robustness which can produce private estimators with optimal tradeoffs among sample complexity, accuracy, and privacy for a wide range of fundamental high-dimensional parameter estimation problems, including mean and covariance estimation. We show that this reduction can be implemented in polynomial time in some important special cases. In particular, using nearly-optimal polynomial-time robust estimators for the mean and covariance of high-dimensional Gaussians which are based on the Sum-of-Squares method, we design the first polynomial-time private estimators for these problems with nearly-optimal samples-accuracy-privacy tradeoffs. Our algorithms are also robust to a nearly optimal fraction of adversarially-corrupted samples.
6/18/2024