Probabilistic Iterative Hard Thresholding for Sparse Learning

Read original: arXiv:2409.01413 - Published 9/4/2024 by Matteo Bergamaschi, Andrea Cristofari, Vyacheslav Kungurtsev, Francesco Rinaldi
Total Score

0

Probabilistic Iterative Hard Thresholding for Sparse Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a new algorithm called Probabilistic Iterative Hard Thresholding (PIHT) for sparse learning.
  • PIHT is designed to efficiently solve large-scale sparse optimization problems, where the goal is to find a sparse solution to a linear system of equations.
  • The algorithm combines techniques from iterative hard thresholding and probabilistic methods to achieve faster convergence and better performance compared to existing approaches.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world problems, we need to find a solution that is sparse, meaning it has only a few non-zero elements. This could be the case when trying to compress a neural network or identify a small number of relevant features from a large dataset.

The PIHT algorithm is designed to efficiently find these sparse solutions. It works by iteratively updating a solution, keeping only the most important elements and discarding the rest. The algorithm also incorporates probabilistic techniques to improve its performance and speed up convergence.

Compared to other methods, PIHT is able to find sparse solutions faster and more accurately, which can be valuable in a wide range of applications where computational efficiency and accurate modeling are important.

Technical Explanation

The PIHT algorithm is an iterative method for solving sparse optimization problems of the form:

minimize ||Ax - b||^2 subject to ||x||_0 <= k

where A is a matrix, b is a vector, and k is the desired sparsity level (i.e., the maximum number of non-zero elements in the solution x).

The key steps of the PIHT algorithm are:

  1. Start with an initial guess for the sparse solution x.
  2. Compute the gradient of the objective function ||Ax - b||^2 with respect to x.
  3. Apply a hard thresholding operation to the gradient, keeping only the k largest elements in magnitude and setting the rest to zero.
  4. Update the solution x by taking a step in the direction of the thresholded gradient.
  5. Repeat steps 2-4 until convergence.

The algorithm also incorporates a probabilistic component, where the hard thresholding operation is performed in a stochastic manner to encourage exploration of the solution space and improve convergence properties.

The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the performance of PIHT, showing that it can achieve faster convergence rates and better recovery of the true sparse solution compared to other iterative hard thresholding methods.

Critical Analysis

The PIHT algorithm is a promising approach for solving large-scale sparse optimization problems, but it does have some limitations:

  • The theoretical analysis assumes the matrix A satisfies certain conditions, such as the restricted isometry property, which may not hold in all practical scenarios.
  • The algorithm requires tuning of several hyperparameters, such as the step size and the probability distribution used for the stochastic hard thresholding, which can be challenging in practice.
  • The authors do not provide a comprehensive comparison to other state-of-the-art sparse optimization methods, so it is difficult to assess the relative performance of PIHT in different problem settings.

Further research could explore ways to make PIHT more robust to violations of the theoretical assumptions, as well as investigate strategies for automatic hyperparameter tuning to improve its ease of use and broader applicability.

Conclusion

The PIHT algorithm is a novel approach for efficiently solving sparse optimization problems, combining iterative hard thresholding with probabilistic techniques to achieve faster convergence and better recovery of sparse solutions. While the algorithm has theoretical guarantees and shows promising results, there are still some open challenges that warrant further investigation. Overall, the paper represents an interesting contribution to the field of sparse learning and optimization.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Probabilistic Iterative Hard Thresholding for Sparse Learning
Total Score

0

Probabilistic Iterative Hard Thresholding for Sparse Learning

Matteo Bergamaschi, Andrea Cristofari, Vyacheslav Kungurtsev, Francesco Rinaldi

For statistical modeling wherein the data regime is unfavorable in terms of dimensionality relative to the sample size, finding hidden sparsity in the ground truth can be critical in formulating an accurate statistical model. The so-called l0 norm which counts the number of non-zero components in a vector, is a strong reliable mechanism of enforcing sparsity when incorporated into an optimization problem. However, in big data settings wherein noisy estimates of the gradient must be evaluated out of computational necessity, the literature is scant on methods that reliably converge. In this paper we present an approach towards solving expectation objective optimization problems with cardinality constraints. We prove convergence of the underlying stochastic process, and demonstrate the performance on two Machine Learning problems.

Read more

9/4/2024

Stochastic Variance-Reduced Iterative Hard Thresholding in Graph Sparsity Optimization
Total Score

0

Stochastic Variance-Reduced Iterative Hard Thresholding in Graph Sparsity Optimization

Derek Fox, Samuel Hernandez, Qianqian Tong

Stochastic optimization algorithms are widely used for large-scale data analysis due to their low per-iteration costs, but they often suffer from slow asymptotic convergence caused by inherent variance. Variance-reduced techniques have been therefore used to address this issue in structured sparse models utilizing sparsity-inducing norms or $ell_0$-norms. However, these techniques are not directly applicable to complex (non-convex) graph sparsity models, which are essential in applications like disease outbreak monitoring and social network analysis. In this paper, we introduce two stochastic variance-reduced gradient-based methods to solve graph sparsity optimization: GraphSVRG-IHT and GraphSCSG-IHT. We provide a general framework for theoretical analysis, demonstrating that our methods enjoy a linear convergence speed. Extensive experiments validate

Read more

7/25/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Learning a Sparse Neural Network using IHT

Saeed Damadi, Soroush Zolfaghari, Mahdi Rezaie, Jinglai Shen

The core of a good model is in its ability to focus only on important information that reflects the basic patterns and consistencies, thus pulling out a clear, noise-free signal from the dataset. This necessitates using a simplified model defined by fewer parameters. The importance of theoretical foundations becomes clear in this context, as this paper relies on established results from the domain of advanced sparse optimization, particularly those addressing nonlinear differentiable functions. The need for such theoretical foundations is further highlighted by the trend that as computational power for training NNs increases, so does the complexity of the models in terms of a higher number of parameters. In practical scenarios, these large models are often simplified to more manageable versions with fewer parameters. Understanding why these simplified models with less number of parameters remain effective raises a crucial question. Understanding why these simplified models with fewer parameters remain effective raises an important question. This leads to the broader question of whether there is a theoretical framework that can clearly explain these empirical observations. Recent developments, such as establishing necessary conditions for the convergence of iterative hard thresholding (IHT) to a sparse local minimum (a sparse method analogous to gradient descent) are promising. The remarkable capacity of the IHT algorithm to accurately identify and learn the locations of nonzero parameters underscores its practical effectiveness and utility. This paper aims to investigate whether the theoretical prerequisites for such convergence are applicable in the realm of neural network (NN) training by providing justification for all the necessary conditions for convergence. Then, these conditions are validated by experiments on a single-layer NN, using the IRIS dataset as a testbed.

Read more

7/18/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

High Probability Complexity Bounds for Non-Smooth Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise

Eduard Gorbunov, Marina Danilova, Innokentiy Shibaev, Pavel Dvurechensky, Alexander Gasnikov

Stochastic first-order methods are standard for training large-scale machine learning models. Random behavior may cause a particular run of an algorithm to result in a highly suboptimal objective value, whereas theoretical guarantees are usually proved for the expectation of the objective value. Thus, it is essential to theoretically guarantee that algorithms provide small objective residual with high probability. Existing methods for non-smooth stochastic convex optimization have complexity bounds with the dependence on the confidence level that is either negative-power or logarithmic but under an additional assumption of sub-Gaussian (light-tailed) noise distribution that may not hold in practice. In our paper, we resolve this issue and derive the first high-probability convergence results with logarithmic dependence on the confidence level for non-smooth convex stochastic optimization problems with non-sub-Gaussian (heavy-tailed) noise. To derive our results, we propose novel stepsize rules for two stochastic methods with gradient clipping. Moreover, our analysis works for generalized smooth objectives with Holder-continuous gradients, and for both methods, we provide an extension for strongly convex problems. Finally, our results imply that the first (accelerated) method we consider also has optimal iteration and oracle complexity in all the regimes, and the second one is optimal in the non-smooth setting.

Read more

9/2/2024