Probabilistic unifying relations for modelling epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty: semantics and automated reasoning with theorem proving

Overview

• Probabilistic programming combines computer programming, statistical inference, and formal semantics to help systems make decisions under uncertainty.
• Probabilistic programs are widely used, including in machine intelligence, but their automated verification based on formal semantics is a relatively new research area.
• The paper presents "probabilistic unifying relations" (ProbURel), which takes steps to address the challenges in this research area.

Plain English Explanation

Probabilistic programming allows computer systems to make decisions when they are not completely certain about the information they have. This is important because real-world situations often involve uncertainty.

The paper focuses on a specific type of probabilistic programming called "predicative probabilistic programming," which was developed by Hehner. However, there are obstacles to wider adoption of this approach. The researchers here have addressed these obstacles by:

1. Formalizing the syntax and semantics of predicative probabilistic programming, including using a notation to separate mathematical relations from probabilities.
2. Representing relations using a framework called Unifying Theories of Programming (UTP) and modeling probabilities using mathematical summation.
3. Developing a way to reason about probabilistic loops using fixed-point theory.
4. Extending the semantics to handle different types of probability distributions.
5. Proving a unique fixed-point theorem to simplify reasoning about probabilistic loops.
6. Implementing the theory in a theorem-proving software called Isabelle/UTP, allowing automated reasoning.

The researchers demonstrate their approach with examples from robotics, machine learning, and the behavior of probabilistic programs.

Technical Explanation

The core contribution of the paper is the probabilistic unifying relations (ProbURel) framework, which builds on Hehner's predicative probabilistic programming.

The researchers first formalize the syntax and semantics of predicative probabilistic programming, introducing an Iverson bracket notation to separate mathematical relations from probabilities. They then represent the relations using the Unifying Theories of Programming (UTP) framework and model the probabilities using summation over the real number space.

A key aspect is the constructive semantics for probabilistic loops, which the researchers develop using Kleene's fixed-point theorem. To handle this constructive semantics, they enrich the semantics to deal with subdistributions and superdistributions (variants of probability distributions).

The researchers also prove a unique fixed-point theorem, which simplifies the reasoning about probabilistic loops. Finally, they mechanize the entire ProbURel theory in the Isabelle/UTP theorem-proving system, enabling automated reasoning.

The paper demonstrates the ProbURel framework with six examples, including problems in robot localization, classification in machine learning, and the termination of probabilistic loops.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a significant contribution to the field of probabilistic programming by addressing several key obstacles in the adoption of Hehner's predicative probabilistic programming. The formalization of syntax and semantics, as well as the use of UTP and fixed-point theory, are important advancements.

However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations or caveats of the ProbURel framework. For example, the performance and scalability of the approach, especially when dealing with complex probabilistic models, are not addressed. Additionally, the paper does not compare ProbURel to other probabilistic programming frameworks or discuss how it might fit into the broader landscape of probabilistic programming research.

Furthermore, the paper could have provided more insights into the practical implications and real-world applications of the ProbURel framework. While the examples are helpful, a deeper discussion of the challenges and trade-offs involved in applying the framework to complex, real-world problems would have been valuable.

Conclusion

The probabilistic unifying relations (ProbURel) framework presented in this paper represents a significant step forward in the field of probabilistic programming. By addressing the obstacles in Hehner's predicative probabilistic programming and developing a formal, mechanized theory, the researchers have laid the groundwork for more robust and verifiable probabilistic systems.

The potential impact of this work extends beyond the specific examples provided, as the ProbURel framework could be applied to a wide range of domains where uncertainty plays a crucial role, such as robotics, machine learning, and decision-making. Further research on the scalability, limitations, and broader applications of ProbURel will be important to fully realize its potential.