Declarative Probabilistic Logic Programming in Discrete-Continuous Domains

Read original: arXiv:2302.10674 - Published 9/10/2024 by Pedro Zuidberg Dos Martires, Luc De Raedt, Angelika Kimmig
Total Score

0

🖼️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new probabilistic logic programming (PLP) paradigm called the "measure semantics" that supports both discrete and continuous random variables.
  • This new semantics, along with the hybrid PLP language DC-ProbLog and the inference engine IALW, generalize the existing distribution semantics, standard PLP languages, and inference engines.
  • The research aims to advance the state of the art in PLP by addressing limitations in modeling, language, and inference capabilities.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new approach to probabilistic logic programming (PLP), a field that combines logic programming with probabilistic modeling. Over the past few decades, PLP has been successfully used to represent and reason about uncertain information.

The core idea behind traditional PLP is the distribution semantics, which provides a clear mathematical foundation for modeling discrete random variables. However, this semantics is limited to discrete variables only. The authors argue that this is a significant limitation, as many real-world problems involve a mix of discrete and continuous (or "hybrid") random variables.

To address this, the researchers introduce the measure semantics, which generalizes the distribution semantics to support both discrete and continuous random variables. They also present a new PLP language called DC-ProbLog (where "DC" stands for "distributional clauses") and an inference engine called IALW (Infinitesimal Algebraic Likelihood Weighting) that can work with this hybrid PLP paradigm.

The key idea is that the measure semantics, DC-ProbLog language, and IALW inference engine can serve as a unifying framework that encompasses the original distribution semantics, standard PLP languages like ProbLog, and the standard inference algorithms for PLP based on knowledge compilation. In other words, the new approach generalizes and expands the state of the art in PLP.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the measure semantics, which generalizes the existing distribution semantics used in traditional probabilistic logic programming (PLP). The distribution semantics is limited to discrete random variables, whereas the measure semantics can handle both discrete and continuous (or "hybrid") random variables.

The authors present the DC-ProbLog language, which extends the popular ProbLog PLP language to support the new measure semantics. DC-ProbLog allows for the representation of hybrid random variables and their probabilistic relationships.

To perform inference in this hybrid PLP setting, the researchers develop the IALW (Infinitesimal Algebraic Likelihood Weighting) algorithm. IALW is based on the knowledge compilation approach used in standard PLP inference, but it is generalized to work with the measure semantics and handle both discrete and continuous random variables.

The key contribution of this work is the unification of PLP semantics, language, and inference. The measure semantics, DC-ProbLog, and IALW all generalize the existing state of the art, encompassing the original distribution semantics, standard PLP languages, and standard PLP inference algorithms as special cases.

Critical Analysis

The measure semantics, DC-ProbLog language, and IALW inference engine proposed in this paper represent a significant advancement in the field of probabilistic logic programming. By generalizing the distribution semantics to support hybrid random variables, the authors have addressed an important limitation in the existing PLP paradigm.

One potential limitation of the approach is the complexity of the measure semantics and IALW algorithm, which may make them challenging to implement and use in practice. The paper provides the theoretical underpinnings, but further work may be needed to develop user-friendly tools and libraries that make this hybrid PLP framework more accessible to a broader audience.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the practical performance and scalability of the IALW algorithm, which would be important to understand the real-world applicability of the proposed approach. Future research could explore the efficiency and scalability of the inference engine, as well as its performance on a wider range of benchmark problems and real-world use cases.

Overall, the theoretical contributions of this paper are significant, and the measure semantics, DC-ProbLog, and IALW algorithm represent an important step forward in the field of probabilistic logic programming. Further research and development in this area could lead to more powerful and flexible tools for probabilistic modeling and reasoning, with applications across a wide range of domains.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a new probabilistic logic programming (PLP) paradigm called the "measure semantics" that supports both discrete and continuous random variables. This measure semantics, along with the hybrid PLP language DC-ProbLog and the inference engine IALW, generalize the existing distribution semantics, standard PLP languages, and inference engines.

By addressing the limitations in modeling, language, and inference capabilities of traditional PLP, the researchers have made a significant contribution to advancing the state of the art in this field. The proposed approach has the potential to enable more powerful and flexible probabilistic modeling and reasoning, with applications across a wide range of domains.

While the theoretical foundations presented in the paper are strong, further research and development may be needed to improve the practical implementation and scalability of the measure semantics and IALW algorithm. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the ongoing evolution of probabilistic logic programming.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Total Score

0

Declarative Probabilistic Logic Programming in Discrete-Continuous Domains

Pedro Zuidberg Dos Martires, Luc De Raedt, Angelika Kimmig

Over the past three decades, the logic programming paradigm has been successfully expanded to support probabilistic modeling, inference and learning. The resulting paradigm of probabilistic logic programming (PLP) and its programming languages owes much of its success to a declarative semantics, the so-called distribution semantics. However, the distribution semantics is limited to discrete random variables only. While PLP has been extended in various ways for supporting hybrid, that is, mixed discrete and continuous random variables, we are still lacking a declarative semantics for hybrid PLP that not only generalizes the distribution semantics and the modeling language but also the standard inference algorithm that is based on knowledge compilation. We contribute the measure semantics together with the hybrid PLP language DC-ProbLog (where DC stands for distributional clauses) and its inference engine infinitesimal algebraic likelihood weighting (IALW). These have the original distribution semantics, standard PLP languages such as ProbLog, and standard inference engines for PLP based on knowledge compilation as special cases. Thus, we generalize the state of the art of PLP towards hybrid PLP in three different aspects: semantics, language and inference. Furthermore, IALW is the first inference algorithm for hybrid probabilistic programming based on knowledge compilation

Read more

9/10/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

The generalised distribution semantics and projective families of distributions

Felix Weitkamper

We generalise the distribution semantics underpinning probabilistic logic programming by distilling its essential concept, the separation of a free random component and a deterministic part. This abstracts the core ideas beyond logic programming as such to encompass frameworks from probabilistic databases, probabilistic finite model theory and discrete lifted Bayesian networks. To demonstrate the usefulness of such a general approach, we completely characterise the projective families of distributions representable in the generalised distribution semantics and we demonstrate both that large classes of interesting projective families cannot be represented in a generalised distribution semantics and that already a very limited fragment of logic programming (acyclic determinate logic programs) in the determinsitic part suffices to represent all those projective families that are representable in the generalised distribution semantics at all.

Read more

5/17/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Explaining Explanations in Probabilistic Logic Programming

Germ'an Vidal

The emergence of tools based on artificial intelligence has also led to the need of producing explanations which are understandable by a human being. In most approaches, the system is considered a black box, making it difficult to generate appropriate explanations. In this work, though, we consider a setting where models are transparent: probabilistic logic programming (PLP), a paradigm that combines logic programming for knowledge representation and probability to model uncertainty. However, given a query, the usual notion of explanation is associated with a set of choices, one for each random variable of the model. Unfortunately, such a set does not explain why the query is true and, in fact, it may contain choices that are actually irrelevant for the considered query. To improve this situation, we present in this paper an approach to explaining explanations which is based on defining a new query-driven inference mechanism for PLP where proofs are labeled with choice expressions, a compact and easy to manipulate representation for sets of choices. The combination of proof trees and choice expressions allows us to produce comprehensible query justifications with a causal structure.

Read more

9/4/2024

Data Petri Nets meet Probabilistic Programming (Extended version)
Total Score

0

Data Petri Nets meet Probabilistic Programming (Extended version)

Martin Kuhn, Joscha Gruger, Christoph Matheja, Andrey Rivkin

Probabilistic programming (PP) is a programming paradigm that allows for writing statistical models like ordinary programs, performing simulations by running those programs, and analyzing and refining their statistical behavior using powerful inference engines. This paper takes a step towards leveraging PP for reasoning about data-aware processes. To this end, we present a systematic translation of Data Petri Nets (DPNs) into a model written in a PP language whose features are supported by most PP systems. We show that our translation is sound and provides statistical guarantees for simulating DPNs. Furthermore, we discuss how PP can be used for process mining tasks and report on a prototype implementation of our translation. We also discuss further analysis scenarios that could be easily approached based on the proposed translation and available PP tools.

Read more

6/19/2024