Probabilistic Verification of Neural Networks using Branch and Bound

Read original: arXiv:2405.17556 - Published 5/29/2024 by David Boetius, Stefan Leue, Tobias Sutter
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new algorithm for the probabilistic verification of neural networks.
  • Probabilistic verification involves analyzing the output distribution of a neural network under a probability distribution of the inputs.
  • The algorithm uses state-of-the-art bound propagation and branch and bound techniques from non-probabilistic neural network verification to significantly outperform existing probabilistic verification algorithms.
  • The paper includes a theoretical analysis proving the soundness and, under certain conditions, completeness of the algorithm.

Plain English Explanation

Probabilistic verification of neural networks is a way to formally analyze the behavior of a neural network when the inputs have some uncertainty or randomness associated with them. This could be useful for verifying things like demographic fairness or quantifying the safety of a neural network system.

The key idea of this new algorithm is to compute and repeatedly refine upper and lower bounds on the probabilities of different outputs from the neural network. By using advanced techniques like bound propagation and branch and bound that have been developed for non-probabilistic neural network verification, the algorithm can solve these probabilistic verification problems much faster than previous methods - reducing solving times from tens of minutes down to tens of seconds.

The algorithm is also shown to be theoretically sound and, under certain conditions, complete, meaning it will always find the right answer given enough time and computational resources. This is an important theoretical guarantee that provides confidence in the reliability of the approach.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a new algorithm for the probabilistic verification of neural networks. The algorithm works by computing and iteratively refining lower and upper bounds on the probabilities of different outputs from the neural network, based on a given probability distribution over the inputs.

The key innovations of the algorithm are:

  1. Leveraging state-of-the-art bound propagation and branch and bound techniques from non-probabilistic neural network verification to significantly improve the efficiency of the probabilistic verification process.

  2. A theoretical analysis proving the soundness of the algorithm, and showing that it is complete (i.e., will always find the right answer) under mildly restrictive conditions when using suitable heuristics.

The paper evaluates the new algorithm on various benchmarks from the literature, demonstrating that it can reduce solving times from tens of minutes to tens of seconds compared to existing probabilistic verification approaches. The algorithm also compares favorably to dedicated algorithms for restricted subsets of probabilistic verification problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising new approach to the important problem of probabilistic verification of neural networks. The key strengths of the algorithm are its strong theoretical foundations, demonstrated empirical performance, and the ability to leverage advances from the broader neural network verification field.

However, the paper does not discuss any potential limitations or caveats of the approach. For example, it is not clear how the algorithm would scale to very large or deep neural networks, or how it might perform on highly complex, multimodal input distributions.

Additionally, while the theoretical analysis shows the algorithm is sound and complete under certain conditions, the practical implications of these conditions are not explored in depth. It would be valuable to understand the types of neural networks and verification problems where the algorithm is most likely to be effective.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in probabilistic neural network verification, but there are still opportunities to further develop and refine the approach to address a wider range of real-world challenges. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of this work and consider how it might be extended or applied in their own domains of interest.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new algorithm for the probabilistic verification of neural networks that significantly outperforms existing approaches. By leveraging advanced techniques from the broader neural network verification field, the algorithm can solve complex probabilistic verification problems orders of magnitude faster than previous methods.

The strong theoretical foundations and empirical results of this work make it a valuable contribution to the growing field of neural network verification. The ability to formally analyze the output distributions of neural networks under uncertain inputs has important implications for ensuring the safety and fairness of AI systems in high-stakes applications.

While the paper does not explore all the potential limitations of the approach, it represents an important step forward in making probabilistic verification of neural networks a more practical and accessible tool for researchers and developers. Further advancements in this area could lead to significant improvements in the robustness and reliability of AI systems deployed in the real world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Probabilistic Verification of Neural Networks using Branch and Bound

David Boetius, Stefan Leue, Tobias Sutter

Probabilistic verification of neural networks is concerned with formally analysing the output distribution of a neural network under a probability distribution of the inputs. Examples of probabilistic verification include verifying the demographic parity fairness notion or quantifying the safety of a neural network. We present a new algorithm for the probabilistic verification of neural networks based on an algorithm for computing and iteratively refining lower and upper bounds on probabilities over the outputs of a neural network. By applying state-of-the-art bound propagation and branch and bound techniques from non-probabilistic neural network verification, our algorithm significantly outpaces existing probabilistic verification algorithms, reducing solving times for various benchmarks from the literature from tens of minutes to tens of seconds. Furthermore, our algorithm compares favourably even to dedicated algorithms for restricted subsets of probabilistic verification. We complement our empirical evaluation with a theoretical analysis, proving that our algorithm is sound and, under mildly restrictive conditions, also complete when using a suitable set of heuristics.

Read more

5/29/2024

Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearities
Total Score

0

Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearities

Zhouxing Shi, Qirui Jin, Zico Kolter, Suman Jana, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Huan Zhang

Branch-and-bound (BaB) is among the most effective methods for neural network (NN) verification. However, existing works on BaB have mostly focused on NNs with piecewise linear activations, especially ReLU networks. In this paper, we develop a general framework, named GenBaB, to conduct BaB for general nonlinearities in general computational graphs based on linear bound propagation. To decide which neuron to branch, we design a new branching heuristic which leverages linear bounds as shortcuts to efficiently estimate the potential improvement after branching. To decide nontrivial branching points for general nonlinear functions, we propose to optimize branching points offline, which can be efficiently leveraged during verification with a lookup table. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our GenBaB on verifying a wide range of NNs, including networks with activation functions such as Sigmoid, Tanh, Sine and GeLU, as well as networks involving multi-dimensional nonlinear operations such as multiplications in LSTMs and Vision Transformers. Our framework also allows the verification of general nonlinear computation graphs and enables verification applications beyond simple neural networks, particularly for AC Optimal Power Flow (ACOPF). GenBaB is part of the latest $alpha,!beta$-CROWN, the winner of the 4th International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2023).

Read more

6/3/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Tightening the Evaluation of PAC Bounds Using Formal Verification Results

Thomas Walker, Alessio Lomuscio

Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) bounds are widely used to derive probabilistic guarantees for the generalisation of machine learning models. They highlight the components of the model which contribute to its generalisation capacity. However, current state-of-the-art results are loose in approximating the generalisation capacity of deployed machine learning models. Consequently, while PAC bounds are theoretically useful, their applicability for evaluating a model's generalisation property in a given operational design domain is limited. The underlying classical theory is supported by the idea that bounds can be tightened when the number of test points available to the user to evaluate the model increases. Yet, in the case of neural networks, the number of test points required to obtain bounds of interest is often impractical even for small problems. In this paper, we take the novel approach of using the formal verification of neural systems to inform the evaluation of PAC bounds. Rather than using pointwise information obtained from repeated tests, we use verification results on regions around test points. We show that conditioning existing bounds on verification results leads to a tightening proportional to the underlying probability mass of the verified region.

Read more

7/30/2024

A SAT-based approach to rigorous verification of Bayesian networks
Total Score

0

A SAT-based approach to rigorous verification of Bayesian networks

Ignacy Stk{e}pka, Nicholas Gisolfi, Artur Dubrawski

Recent advancements in machine learning have accelerated its widespread adoption across various real-world applications. However, in safety-critical domains, the deployment of machine learning models is riddled with challenges due to their complexity, lack of interpretability, and absence of formal guarantees regarding their behavior. In this paper, we introduce a verification framework tailored for Bayesian networks, designed to address these drawbacks. Our framework comprises two key components: (1) a two-step compilation and encoding scheme that translates Bayesian networks into Boolean logic literals, and (2) formal verification queries that leverage these literals to verify various properties encoded as constraints. Specifically, we introduce two verification queries: if-then rules (ITR) and feature monotonicity (FMO). We benchmark the efficiency of our verification scheme and demonstrate its practical utility in real-world scenarios.

Read more

8/6/2024