Problems in AI, their roots in philosophy, and implications for science and society

Overview

• This paper examines the philosophical aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) and its use.
• It argues that there is a lack of attention paid to the philosophical underpinnings of AI technology.
• The paper identifies philosophical misconceptions about the growth of knowledge that underlie current AI approaches.
• It proposes a more realistic outlook on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and makes recommendations on the relationship between AI and philosophy.

Plain English Explanation

The paper suggests that the rapid development of AI technology has not been matched by a corresponding focus on the philosophical questions and implications surrounding it. It argues that many of the current approaches to AI are based on flawed theories of knowledge, such as inductivism, empiricism, and instrumentalism.

The authors draw on the ideas of philosophers like Karl Popper and David Deutsch to show that these theories are fundamentally mistaken. They argue that these flawed philosophical foundations underlie much of the current discourse around AI, including the branch known as "Bayesianism."

The paper then analyzes the implications of these mistaken philosophies for the use of AI in science and society, and discusses some of the potential problem situations that may arise. Finally, it proposes a more realistic outlook on AGI and makes recommendations on how AI development should be informed by sound philosophical principles.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by arguing that there is a deficit in the philosophical analysis of AI technology and its use. It claims that this deficit is often coupled with philosophical misconceptions about the growth of knowledge.

To identify these misconceptions, the authors reference the ideas of the philosopher of science Karl Popper and the physicist David Deutsch. Both thinkers have developed critiques of mistaken theories of knowledge, such as inductivism, empiricism, and instrumentalism. The paper demonstrates that these flawed philosophical theories bear similarities to the way current AI technology operates.

The authors show that these mistaken theories of knowledge are also very much alive in the public discourse on AI, often referred to as "Bayesianism." In line with Popper and Deutsch, the paper proposes that all of these theories are based on erroneous philosophies of knowledge.

The paper then provides an analysis of the implications of these mistaken philosophies for the use of AI in science and society, including some of the likely problem situations that may arise. Finally, it offers a more realistic outlook on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and three propositions on the relationship between A(G)I and philosophy (i.e., epistemology).

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important points about the need to critically examine the philosophical foundations underlying the development and use of AI technology. It rightly identifies that the rapid progress in AI has not been matched by a corresponding depth of analysis on the philosophical implications.

The authors' critique of inductivism, empiricism, and instrumentalism as flawed theories of knowledge that underlie current AI approaches is well-argued and supported by the ideas of Popper and Deutsch. This suggests that there are fundamental philosophical issues that need to be addressed in order to develop AI systems that are truly aligned with sound epistemological principles.

However, the paper could have delved deeper into the specific philosophical problems with these theories and how they manifest in contemporary AI systems and discourse. Additionally, the authors could have provided more concrete examples or case studies to illustrate their points and make the complex philosophical concepts more accessible to a general audience.

While the paper offers a realistic outlook on AGI and some high-level propositions for the relationship between AI and philosophy, it could have gone further in outlining a more detailed roadmap or framework for how this philosophical analysis should be incorporated into the development and deployment of AI technologies.

Conclusion

This paper makes a compelling case for the need to pay greater attention to the philosophical underpinnings of AI technology and its use. By identifying the flawed theories of knowledge that underlie current AI approaches, the authors highlight the importance of grounding the development of AI in sound epistemological principles.

The paper's analysis of the implications of these mistaken philosophies for the use of AI in science and society, as well as its proposals for a more realistic outlook on AGI, provide a valuable starting point for further discussion and research in this critical area. As AI continues to advance and become more pervasive, it is essential that its philosophical foundations are thoroughly examined and addressed to ensure that these powerful technologies are developed and deployed in a responsible and ethically-aligned manner.