Prompt-based Pseudo-labeling Strategy for Sample-Efficient Semi-Supervised Extractive Summarization

Overview

• Semi-supervised learning (SSL) is a technique used when there is limited labeled data, but plenty of unlabeled data available.
• While SSL is popular for image and text classification, it hasn't been widely explored for extractive text summarization.
• Standard SSL methods use a teacher-student model to train a classifier and then generate pseudo-labels from the classifier's confidence values.
• However, these classifiers are not well-tuned for evaluating the accuracy of the pseudo-labels, leading to confidence values that don't capture the semantics and correctness of the generated summaries.

Plain English Explanation

When you're trying to teach a machine learning model to do something, it's often helpful to have lots of examples of what you want it to learn. However, sometimes it's hard to get enough labeled examples, where someone has already told the model what the right answer is. This paper explores a technique called semi-supervised learning that can help in these situations.

The basic idea is that even if you don't have many labeled examples, you might have lots of unlabeled examples - data where you haven't told the model the right answer. Semi-supervised learning tries to use those unlabeled examples to help the model learn better, even without knowing the right answers ahead of time.

One common way to do this is to first train a model to classify the labeled examples, and then use that model to "guess" the labels for the unlabeled examples. Those guessed labels are called "pseudo-labels". The model can then be trained further using both the original labeled examples and the new pseudo-labeled examples.

However, the authors of this paper found that this approach doesn't work as well for the specific task of summarizing text. The reason is that the initial classifier model isn't really designed to judge the quality of the pseudo-labels it generates. So the pseudo-labels it produces might not actually be very good, even if the model is confident about them.

To address this, the researchers propose a new approach that uses a large language model (like GPT-3) to generate and score the pseudo-labels, instead of relying on the initial classifier. This helps ensure that the pseudo-labels are more accurate and capture the true meaning of the text being summarized.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose a prompt-based pseudo-labeling strategy with large language models (LLMs) to address the limitations of standard SSL methods for text summarization. Their approach includes two key components:

1. Pseudo-label Generation: Instead of using a classifier's confidence values to select pseudo-labels, the authors leverage the generation and ranking capabilities of LLMs to produce more accurate pseudo-labels. The LLM is prompted to generate a summary for each unlabeled example, and the quality of the generated summary is then scored by the LLM itself.

2. Pseudo-label Relabeling: The authors also introduce a relabeling mechanism to further improve the quality of the pseudo-labels. This involves using the LLM to re-generate and re-score the pseudo-labels, effectively "correcting" any mistakes in the initial pseudo-labels.

The authors evaluate their method on three text summarization datasets: TweetSumm, WikiHow, and ArXiv/PubMed. They show that their prompt-based LLM approach outperforms existing SSL methods on standard ROUGE metrics for evaluating summarization quality. Moreover, their method achieves competitive performance compared to a fully supervised model that uses 100% of the labeled data, while only requiring 16.67% of the labeled data.

Critical Analysis

The authors present a novel and promising approach to addressing the limitations of standard SSL methods for text summarization. By leveraging the generation and ranking capabilities of LLMs, they are able to produce more accurate pseudo-labels that better capture the semantics and correctness of the generated summaries.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses on extractive text summarization, where the summarization model selects and rearranges existing text from the input. It would be interesting to see if the authors' approach could also be applied to abstractive summarization, where the model generates novel text to summarize the input.

Additionally, the authors only evaluate their method on English-language datasets. It would be valuable to see how their approach performs on summarization tasks in other languages, as the availability of high-quality LLMs may vary across languages.

Overall, this paper presents a compelling semi-supervised learning approach for text summarization that leverages the capabilities of large language models. The authors' findings suggest that this strategy can be an effective way to learn from limited labeled data and achieve strong summarization performance.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel semi-supervised learning approach for text summarization that addresses the limitations of standard SSL methods. By using large language models to generate and score pseudo-labels, the authors are able to produce more accurate pseudo-labels that better capture the semantics and correctness of the generated summaries.

The authors' prompt-based pseudo-labeling strategy and relabeling mechanism demonstrate strong performance on several text summarization datasets, outperforming existing SSL methods and even achieving competitive results compared to fully supervised models. This suggests that their approach could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working on text summarization tasks with limited labeled data.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of semi-supervised learning, showcasing how the capabilities of large language models can be leveraged to tackle challenging natural language processing tasks like text summarization.