On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language Models
2401.18018
0
0
š¬
Abstract
Prepending model inputs with safety prompts is a common practice for safeguarding large language models (LLMs) against queries with harmful intents. However, the underlying working mechanisms of safety prompts have not been unraveled yet, restricting the possibility of automatically optimizing them to improve LLM safety. In this work, we investigate how LLMs' behavior (i.e., complying with or refusing user queries) is affected by safety prompts from the perspective of model representation. We find that in the representation space, the input queries are typically moved by safety prompts in a higher-refusal direction, in which models become more prone to refusing to provide assistance, even when the queries are harmless. On the other hand, LLMs are naturally capable of distinguishing harmful and harmless queries without safety prompts. Inspired by these findings, we propose a method for safety prompt optimization, namely DRO (Directed Representation Optimization). Treating a safety prompt as continuous, trainable embeddings, DRO learns to move the queries' representations along or opposite the refusal direction, depending on their harmfulness. Experiments with eight LLMs on out-of-domain and jailbreak benchmarks demonstrate that DRO remarkably improves the safeguarding performance of human-crafted safety prompts, without compromising the models' general performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper investigates how safety prompts, commonly used to safeguard large language models (LLMs) against harmful queries, affect the models' behavior and representations.
- The researchers find that safety prompts typically move the input queries in a "higher-refusal direction," making the models more prone to refusing assistance, even for harmless queries.
- Inspired by these findings, the researchers propose a method called Directed Representation Optimization (DRO) to optimize safety prompts and improve LLM safety without compromising overall performance.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, there is a risk that these models could be used to produce harmful or dangerous content. To mitigate this risk, researchers often add "safety prompts" to the model inputs, which are designed to steer the model away from generating harmful responses.
The paper explores how these safety prompts work under the hood. The researchers found that safety prompts tend to move the input queries in a direction that makes the model more likely to refuse to provide any assistance, even for harmless queries. This suggests that while safety prompts can be effective at blocking harmful content, they may also limit the model's overall usefulness.
To address this issue, the researchers propose a new method called Directed Representation Optimization (DRO). DRO learns to optimize the safety prompts to either move the input in a "refusal direction" (for harmful queries) or keep it in a "safe zone" (for harmless queries). This allows the model to maintain its overall capabilities while still effectively blocking dangerous content.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the underlying mechanisms of how safety prompts affect the behavior of large language models (LLMs). The researchers hypothesize that safety prompts move the input queries in the model's representation space, which in turn influences the model's likelihood of refusing to provide assistance.
To test this hypothesis, the researchers analyze the representations of input queries with and without safety prompts. They find that safety prompts typically push the input queries in a "higher-refusal direction," making the models more prone to refusing to help, even for harmless queries. This suggests that while safety prompts can be effective at blocking harmful content, they may also limit the models' overall usefulness.
Inspired by these findings, the researchers propose a method called Directed Representation Optimization (DRO) to optimize safety prompts. DRO treats the safety prompt as a continuous, trainable embedding and learns to move the input queries' representations along or opposite the refusal direction, depending on the harmfulness of the query. Experiments with eight LLMs on out-of-domain and jailbreak benchmarks demonstrate that DRO can significantly improve the safeguarding performance of human-crafted safety prompts without compromising the models' general performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying safety prompts and offers a promising approach to optimizing them. However, the researchers acknowledge that their analysis is limited to the representation space and does not fully explain the models' final decisions.
Additionally, the DRO method relies on the ability to distinguish harmful and harmless queries, which may not always be straightforward. Further research is needed to explore how prompt influence can be more effectively manipulated and to investigate the broader implications of safety prompt optimization on model behavior and societal impact.
Conclusion
This paper sheds light on the inner workings of safety prompts and introduces a novel optimization method, DRO, to improve the safeguarding of large language models. By understanding how safety prompts affect the model's representations and decision-making, the researchers have laid the groundwork for more effective and nuanced approaches to ensuring the safety and reliability of these powerful AI systems. As the development of language models continues to progress, this research will be crucial for guiding the responsible advancement of the technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Mitigating Exaggerated Safety in Large Language Models
Ruchi Bhalani, Ruchira Ray
0
0
As the popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs) grow, combining model safety with utility becomes increasingly important. The challenge is making sure that LLMs can recognize and decline dangerous prompts without sacrificing their ability to be helpful. The problem of exaggerated safety demonstrates how difficult this can be. To reduce excessive safety behaviours -- which was discovered to be 26.1% of safe prompts being misclassified as dangerous and refused -- we use a combination of XSTest dataset prompts as well as interactive, contextual, and few-shot prompting to examine the decision bounds of LLMs such as Llama2, Gemma Command R+, and Phi-3. We find that few-shot prompting works best for Llama2, interactive prompting works best Gemma, and contextual prompting works best for Command R+ and Phi-3. Using a combination of these prompting strategies, we are able to mitigate exaggerated safety behaviors by an overall 92.9% across all LLMs. Our work presents a multiple prompting strategies to jailbreak LLMs' decision-making processes, allowing them to navigate the tight line between refusing unsafe prompts and remaining helpful.
5/10/2024
SLM as Guardian: Pioneering AI Safety with Small Language Models
Ohjoon Kwon, Donghyeon Jeon, Nayoung Choi, Gyu-Hwung Cho, Changbong Kim, Hyunwoo Lee, Inho Kang, Sun Kim, Taiwoo Park
0
0
Most prior safety research of large language models (LLMs) has focused on enhancing the alignment of LLMs to better suit the safety requirements of humans. However, internalizing such safeguard features into larger models brought challenges of higher training cost and unintended degradation of helpfulness. To overcome such challenges, a modular approach employing a smaller LLM to detect harmful user queries is regarded as a convenient solution in designing LLM-based system with safety requirements. In this paper, we leverage a smaller LLM for both harmful query detection and safeguard response generation. We introduce our safety requirements and the taxonomy of harmfulness categories, and then propose a multi-task learning mechanism fusing the two tasks into a single model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, providing on par or surpassing harmful query detection and safeguard response performance compared to the publicly available LLMs.
5/31/2024
From Representational Harms to Quality-of-Service Harms: A Case Study on Llama 2 Safety Safeguards
Khaoula Chehbouni, Megha Roshan, Emmanuel Ma, Futian Andrew Wei, Afaf Taik, Jackie CK Cheung, Golnoosh Farnadi
0
0
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has led to their widespread adoption in various domains. However, these advancements have also introduced additional safety risks and raised concerns regarding their detrimental impact on already marginalized populations. Despite growing mitigation efforts to develop safety safeguards, such as supervised safety-oriented fine-tuning and leveraging safe reinforcement learning from human feedback, multiple concerns regarding the safety and ingrained biases in these models remain. Furthermore, previous work has demonstrated that models optimized for safety often display exaggerated safety behaviors, such as a tendency to refrain from responding to certain requests as a precautionary measure. As such, a clear trade-off between the helpfulness and safety of these models has been documented in the literature. In this paper, we further investigate the effectiveness of safety measures by evaluating models on already mitigated biases. Using the case of Llama 2 as an example, we illustrate how LLMs' safety responses can still encode harmful assumptions. To do so, we create a set of non-toxic prompts, which we then use to evaluate Llama models. Through our new taxonomy of LLMs responses to users, we observe that the safety/helpfulness trade-offs are more pronounced for certain demographic groups which can lead to quality-of-service harms for marginalized populations.
6/11/2024
RePrompt: Planning by Automatic Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models Agents
Weizhe Chen, Sven Koenig, Bistra Dilkina
0
0
In this past year, large language models (LLMs) have had remarkable success in domains outside the traditional natural language processing, and people are starting to explore the usage of LLMs in more general and close to application domains like code generation, travel planning, and robot controls. Connecting these LLMs with great capacity and external tools, people are building the so-called LLM agents, which are supposed to help people do all kinds of work in everyday life. In all these domains, the prompt to the LLMs has been shown to make a big difference in what the LLM would generate and thus affect the performance of the LLM agents. Therefore, automatic prompt engineering has become an important question for many researchers and users of LLMs. In this paper, we propose a novel method, textsc{RePrompt}, which does gradient descent to optimize the step-by-step instructions in the prompt of the LLM agents based on the chat history obtained from interactions with LLM agents. By optimizing the prompt, the LLM will learn how to plan in specific domains. We have used experiments in PDDL generation and travel planning to show that our method could generally improve the performance for different reasoning tasks when using the updated prompt as the initial prompt.
6/18/2024