PropTest: Automatic Property Testing for Improved Visual Programming
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a system called "PropTest" for automatically testing properties of visual programming interfaces
- Aims to improve the reliability and usability of visual programming environments
- Proposes methods for generating test cases and verifying properties of visual programs
Plain English Explanation
PropTest: Automatic Property Testing for Improved Visual Programming presents a system to help make visual programming environments more reliable and user-friendly. Visual programming allows people to create software by arranging and connecting visual components, rather than writing traditional code.
The key idea behind PropTest is to automatically generate test cases and verify that visual programs satisfy certain desired properties. For example, PropTest might check that a visual program always produces the expected output, or that it never crashes. By catching issues early through automated testing, PropTest can help visual programming tools become more robust and easier for users to work with.
The paper describes techniques for generating diverse test cases that exercise different parts of a visual program, as well as methods for efficiently verifying that these test cases satisfy the desired program properties. By automating these testing processes, PropTest aims to make visual programming more practical and accessible for a wider range of users and applications.
Technical Explanation
PropTest: Automatic Property Testing for Improved Visual Programming introduces a framework for automatically testing the properties of visual programming environments. The core components of PropTest include:
-
Test Case Generation: PropTest uses techniques like fuzzing and constraint solving to generate diverse test cases that exercise different parts of a visual program. This helps uncover a wide range of potential issues.
-
Property Verification: The system includes methods for efficiently verifying that the generated test cases satisfy desired program properties, such as correctness, reliability, and safety. This could involve techniques like symbolic execution and model checking.
-
Integration with Visual Programming Environments: PropTest is designed to be integrated with existing visual programming tools, allowing developers to automatically test their visual programs during development and catch problems early.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of PropTest through experiments on a range of visual programming benchmarks. The results show that PropTest is able to automatically find bugs and verify properties of visual programs, outperforming baseline approaches. This suggests that PropTest can be a valuable tool for improving the quality and usability of visual programming environments.
Critical Analysis
The PropTest paper makes a compelling case for the importance of automated property testing in visual programming. By catching issues early through comprehensive testing, the system has the potential to make visual programming tools more reliable and accessible to a wider range of users.
One limitation mentioned in the paper is that PropTest currently focuses on verifying basic program properties, such as correctness and safety. In the future, it would be valuable to expand the system to handle more complex properties, such as performance, security, and user experience. Additionally, the paper does not discuss how PropTest might scale to handle large, real-world visual programs, which could introduce new challenges.
Another area for further research could be exploring ways to make the test case generation and property verification processes more interpretable and user-friendly. Providing developers with clear explanations of why certain test cases were generated, or how properties were verified, could help build trust in the system and make it easier to debug issues.
Overall, the PropTest paper presents a promising approach to improving the reliability and usability of visual programming environments. As visual programming continues to grow in popularity, tools like PropTest will likely become increasingly important for ensuring the quality and trustworthiness of these systems.
Conclusion
PropTest: Automatic Property Testing for Improved Visual Programming introduces a novel framework for automatically testing the properties of visual programming environments. By generating diverse test cases and verifying key program properties, PropTest has the potential to make visual programming tools more reliable, user-friendly, and accessible to a wider range of users.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the PropTest approach through experiments on visual programming benchmarks, and suggests several avenues for future research to expand the system's capabilities. As visual programming continues to gain traction, tools like PropTest will likely play an increasingly important role in ensuring the quality and trustworthiness of these innovative programming paradigms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
PropTest: Automatic Property Testing for Improved Visual Programming
Jaywon Koo, Ziyan Yang, Paola Cascante-Bonilla, Baishakhi Ray, Vicente Ordonez
Visual Programming has recently emerged as an alternative to end-to-end black-box visual reasoning models. This type of method leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate the source code for an executable computer program that solves a given problem. This strategy has the advantage of offering an interpretable reasoning path and does not require finetuning a model with task-specific data. We propose PropTest, a general strategy that improves visual programming by further using an LLM to generate code that tests for visual properties in an initial round of proposed solutions. Our method generates tests for data-type consistency, output syntax, and semantic properties. PropTest achieves comparable results to state-of-the-art methods while using publicly available LLMs. This is demonstrated across different benchmarks on visual question answering and referring expression comprehension. Particularly, PropTest improves ViperGPT by obtaining 46.1% accuracy (+6.0%) on GQA using Llama3-8B and 59.5% (+8.1%) on RefCOCO+ using CodeLlama-34B.
Read more7/24/2024
🛸
0
PropertyGPT: LLM-driven Formal Verification of Smart Contracts through Retrieval-Augmented Property Generation
Ye Liu, Yue Xue, Daoyuan Wu, Yuqiang Sun, Yi Li, Miaolei Shi, Yang Liu
With recent advances in large language models (LLMs), this paper explores the potential of leveraging state-of-the-art LLMs, such as GPT-4, to transfer existing human-written properties (e.g., those from Certora auditing reports) and automatically generate customized properties for unknown code. To this end, we embed existing properties into a vector database and retrieve a reference property for LLM-based in-context learning to generate a new prop- erty for a given code. While this basic process is relatively straight- forward, ensuring that the generated properties are (i) compilable, (ii) appropriate, and (iii) runtime-verifiable presents challenges. To address (i), we use the compilation and static analysis feedback as an external oracle to guide LLMs in iteratively revising the generated properties. For (ii), we consider multiple dimensions of similarity to rank the properties and employ a weighted algorithm to identify the top-K properties as the final result. For (iii), we design a dedicated prover to formally verify the correctness of the generated prop- erties. We have implemented these strategies into a novel system called PropertyGPT, with 623 human-written properties collected from 23 Certora projects. Our experiments show that PropertyGPT can generate comprehensive and high-quality properties, achieving an 80% recall compared to the ground truth. It successfully detected 26 CVEs/attack incidents out of 37 tested and also uncovered 12 zero-day vulnerabilities, resulting in $8,256 bug bounty rewards.
Read more5/7/2024
🛠️
0
LangProp: A code optimization framework using Large Language Models applied to driving
Shu Ishida, Gianluca Corrado, George Fedoseev, Hudson Yeo, Lloyd Russell, Jamie Shotton, Jo~ao F. Henriques, Anthony Hu
We propose LangProp, a framework for iteratively optimizing code generated by large language models (LLMs), in both supervised and reinforcement learning settings. While LLMs can generate sensible coding solutions zero-shot, they are often sub-optimal. Especially for code generation tasks, it is likely that the initial code will fail on certain edge cases. LangProp automatically evaluates the code performance on a dataset of input-output pairs, catches any exceptions, and feeds the results back to the LLM in the training loop, so that the LLM can iteratively improve the code it generates. By adopting a metric- and data-driven training paradigm for this code optimization procedure, one could easily adapt findings from traditional machine learning techniques such as imitation learning, DAgger, and reinforcement learning. We show LangProp's applicability to general domains such as Sudoku and CartPole, as well as demonstrate the first proof of concept of automated code optimization for autonomous driving in CARLA. We show that LangProp can generate interpretable and transparent policies that can be verified and improved in a metric- and data-driven way. Our code is available at https://github.com/shuishida/LangProp.
Read more5/6/2024
0
miniCodeProps: a Minimal Benchmark for Proving Code Properties
Evan Lohn, Sean Welleck
Neural networks have shown initial promise in automating mathematical theorem proving in proof assistants such as Lean. The same proof assistants can be used to verify the correctness of code by pairing code with specifications and proofs that the specifications hold. Automating the writing of code, specifications, and proofs could lower the cost of verification, or, ambitiously, enable a machine learning system to output provably correct code. However, it remains unclear whether current neural theorem provers can automatically verify even relatively simple programs. We present miniCodeProps, a benchmark of 177 program specifications in the Lean proof assistant, aimed at the subproblem of automatically generating a proof for a provided program and specification. miniCodeProps contains specifications about simple, self-contained programs (e.g., lists, natural numbers, binary trees) with varied proof difficulty. Despite its simplicity, miniCodeProps is challenging for current LLM-based provers, which succeed in proving about 25 percent of the specifications. We publicly release miniCodeProps as a benchmark for furthering automated theorem proving in the context of formally verified code.
Read more6/19/2024