miniCodeProps: a Minimal Benchmark for Proving Code Properties
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper introduces miniCodeProps, a minimal benchmark for proving code properties. The benchmark is designed to evaluate the performance of automated theorem provers and other systems that aim to verify the correctness of code.
• The authors argue that existing benchmarks for code property verification are either too simple or too complex, making it difficult to assess the true capabilities of these systems. miniCodeProps aims to fill this gap by providing a set of carefully crafted challenges that balance simplicity and complexity.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new benchmark called miniCodeProps that is designed to test the ability of computer programs to verify the correctness of other computer programs. Verifying the correctness of programs is an important task, as it helps ensure that software works as intended and doesn't have any bugs or errors.
Existing benchmarks for this task either tend to be too easy, where the programs are very simple, or too complex, where the programs are very large and complicated. The authors of this paper argue that these existing benchmarks don't provide a good way to really understand the capabilities of the systems that are trying to verify program correctness.
The miniCodeProps benchmark aims to strike a balance, providing a set of carefully designed challenges that are simple enough to be manageable, but still complex enough to be meaningful tests of a system's abilities. By using this benchmark, researchers and developers can get a better sense of how well their systems can prove the properties or correctness of different kinds of code.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the miniCodeProps benchmark, which consists of a set of carefully crafted code verification challenges. The authors argue that existing benchmarks for this task are either too simple, with trivial programs that are easy to verify, or too complex, with large, real-world codebases that are difficult for current systems to handle.
miniCodeProps is designed to fill this gap by providing a set of challenges that balance simplicity and complexity. The benchmark includes a variety of program types, such as linear arithmetic programs, recursive programs, and programs with loops. Each program is accompanied by a set of properties that the program should satisfy, and the goal is for automated theorem provers or other verification systems to prove that the programs indeed satisfy these properties.
The authors evaluate several existing theorem proving systems on the miniCodeProps benchmark and find that while some systems perform well on certain types of challenges, no single system is able to solve all the problems. This suggests that the benchmark can be a useful tool for driving progress in the field of automated code verification.
Critical Analysis
The miniCodeProps benchmark is a valuable contribution to the field of automated code verification. By providing a balanced set of challenges, the authors have created a tool that can better assess the capabilities of different systems compared to existing benchmarks.
One potential limitation of the benchmark is that it may not capture the full complexity of real-world software systems, which can involve intricate interactions between multiple components and complex data structures. Additionally, the benchmark may not be representative of the types of properties that are most important in practice, such as those related to security or performance.
Further research could explore ways to expand the benchmark to include a wider range of program types and property specifications, while still maintaining the balance between simplicity and complexity. Additionally, the benchmark could be used to drive the development of new verification techniques, such as those that leverage large language models or other advanced AI methods.
Conclusion
The miniCodeProps benchmark introduced in this paper represents an important step forward in the field of automated code verification. By providing a carefully designed set of challenges that balance simplicity and complexity, the benchmark can help researchers and developers better assess the capabilities of their systems and drive progress in this crucial area of computer science.
As the complexity of software systems continues to grow, the need for reliable and efficient code verification tools will only become more pressing. The miniCodeProps benchmark, and the insights it can provide, will be valuable in addressing this challenge and ensuring that the software we rely on is as robust and correct as possible.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
miniCodeProps: a Minimal Benchmark for Proving Code Properties
Evan Lohn, Sean Welleck
Neural networks have shown initial promise in automating mathematical theorem proving in proof assistants such as Lean. The same proof assistants can be used to verify the correctness of code by pairing code with specifications and proofs that the specifications hold. Automating the writing of code, specifications, and proofs could lower the cost of verification, or, ambitiously, enable a machine learning system to output provably correct code. However, it remains unclear whether current neural theorem provers can automatically verify even relatively simple programs. We present miniCodeProps, a benchmark of 177 program specifications in the Lean proof assistant, aimed at the subproblem of automatically generating a proof for a provided program and specification. miniCodeProps contains specifications about simple, self-contained programs (e.g., lists, natural numbers, binary trees) with varied proof difficulty. Despite its simplicity, miniCodeProps is challenging for current LLM-based provers, which succeed in proving about 25 percent of the specifications. We publicly release miniCodeProps as a benchmark for furthering automated theorem proving in the context of formally verified code.
Read more6/19/2024
0
PropTest: Automatic Property Testing for Improved Visual Programming
Jaywon Koo, Ziyan Yang, Paola Cascante-Bonilla, Baishakhi Ray, Vicente Ordonez
Visual Programming has recently emerged as an alternative to end-to-end black-box visual reasoning models. This type of method leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate the source code for an executable computer program that solves a given problem. This strategy has the advantage of offering an interpretable reasoning path and does not require finetuning a model with task-specific data. We propose PropTest, a general strategy that improves visual programming by further using an LLM to generate code that tests for visual properties in an initial round of proposed solutions. Our method generates tests for data-type consistency, output syntax, and semantic properties. PropTest achieves comparable results to state-of-the-art methods while using publicly available LLMs. This is demonstrated across different benchmarks on visual question answering and referring expression comprehension. Particularly, PropTest improves ViperGPT by obtaining 46.1% accuracy (+6.0%) on GQA using Llama3-8B and 59.5% (+8.1%) on RefCOCO+ using CodeLlama-34B.
Read more7/24/2024
🛠️
0
LangProp: A code optimization framework using Large Language Models applied to driving
Shu Ishida, Gianluca Corrado, George Fedoseev, Hudson Yeo, Lloyd Russell, Jamie Shotton, Jo~ao F. Henriques, Anthony Hu
We propose LangProp, a framework for iteratively optimizing code generated by large language models (LLMs), in both supervised and reinforcement learning settings. While LLMs can generate sensible coding solutions zero-shot, they are often sub-optimal. Especially for code generation tasks, it is likely that the initial code will fail on certain edge cases. LangProp automatically evaluates the code performance on a dataset of input-output pairs, catches any exceptions, and feeds the results back to the LLM in the training loop, so that the LLM can iteratively improve the code it generates. By adopting a metric- and data-driven training paradigm for this code optimization procedure, one could easily adapt findings from traditional machine learning techniques such as imitation learning, DAgger, and reinforcement learning. We show LangProp's applicability to general domains such as Sudoku and CartPole, as well as demonstrate the first proof of concept of automated code optimization for autonomous driving in CARLA. We show that LangProp can generate interpretable and transparent policies that can be verified and improved in a metric- and data-driven way. Our code is available at https://github.com/shuishida/LangProp.
Read more5/6/2024
0
miniCTX: Neural Theorem Proving with (Long-)Contexts
Jiewen Hu, Thomas Zhu, Sean Welleck
We introduce miniCTX, which tests a model's ability to prove formal mathematical theorems that depend on new definitions, lemmas, or other contextual information that was not observed during training. miniCTX contains theorems sourced from real Lean projects and textbooks, each associated with a context that can span tens of thousands of tokens. Models are tasked with proving a theorem given access to code from the theorem's repository, which contains context that is helpful or needed for the proof. As a baseline for miniCTX, we introduce file-tuning, a simple recipe that trains a model to generate a proof step conditioned on the preceding file contents. File-tuning substantially outperforms the traditional neural theorem proving approach that fine-tunes on states alone. Additionally, our file-tuned model improves performance on the standard miniF2F benchmark, achieving a pass rate of 33.61%, which is a new state-of-the-art for 1.3B parameter models. Alongside miniCTX, we offer ntp-toolkit for automatically extracting and annotating theorem proving data, making it easy to add new projects into miniCTX to ensure that contexts are not seen during training. miniCTX offers a challenging and realistic perspective on evaluating neural theorem provers.
Read more8/9/2024