ProteinBench: A Holistic Evaluation of Protein Foundation Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- ProteinBench is a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing the performance of protein foundation models across a wide range of tasks.
- The framework covers multiple aspects, including sequence-based, structure-based, and functional tasks, to provide a holistic assessment of model capabilities.
- ProteinBench aims to facilitate the development and benchmarking of more robust and versatile protein foundation models.
Plain English Explanation
ProteinBench: A Holistic Evaluation of Protein Foundation Models introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework to assess the performance of protein foundation models. These models are AI systems trained on large datasets of protein sequences and structures, which can then be used to tackle various tasks related to proteins.
The ProteinBench framework covers a wide range of tasks, including predicting the sequence, structure, and function of proteins. This holistic approach allows researchers to get a more complete understanding of a model's capabilities and limitations.
By evaluating models across this diverse set of tasks, the ProteinBench framework aims to drive the development of more robust and versatile protein foundation models. These advanced models could have significant impacts in fields like drug discovery, biotechnology, and our understanding of the human body.
Technical Explanation
The ProteinBench framework evaluates protein foundation models across three main categories of tasks:
- Sequence-based tasks: These include predicting the primary structure of a protein, identifying functional motifs, and classifying proteins into families.
- Structure-based tasks: These involve predicting the 3D shape or tertiary structure of a protein, as well as identifying structural domains and motifs.
- Functional tasks: These assess a model's ability to infer the biological function of a protein, such as enzyme activity or protein-protein interactions.
The researchers curated a diverse dataset of protein sequences, structures, and functional annotations to serve as the benchmark for evaluating model performance. They also developed novel evaluation metrics to capture different aspects of model capability.
By testing protein foundation models on this comprehensive ProteinBench suite, the researchers aim to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. This knowledge can then guide the development of more robust and versatile models that can tackle a broader range of protein-related tasks.
Critical Analysis
The ProteinBench framework provides a valuable tool for the systematic evaluation of protein foundation models. By covering a diverse set of tasks, it offers a more comprehensive assessment than previous benchmarks focused on narrower domains.
However, the authors acknowledge that the ProteinBench dataset may not capture the full complexity and diversity of real-world protein data. There is also a need for continued expansion and refinement of the benchmark tasks and metrics as the field of protein AI advances.
Additionally, while the ProteinBench framework provides insights into model capabilities, it does not directly address issues of interpretability, robustness, or fairness. Further research is needed to understand how these factors play a role in the deployment of protein foundation models in practical applications.
Conclusion
The ProteinBench framework represents a significant step forward in the comprehensive evaluation of protein foundation models. By assessing a wide range of sequence-based, structure-based, and functional tasks, it enables a more holistic understanding of model capabilities and limitations.
This knowledge can inform the development of more robust and versatile protein foundation models, which could have far-reaching impacts in fields like drug discovery, biotechnology, and our understanding of the human body. As the field of protein AI continues to evolve, the ProteinBench framework will play a crucial role in driving progress and ensuring the responsible development of these powerful technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ProteinBench: A Holistic Evaluation of Protein Foundation Models
Fei Ye, Zaixiang Zheng, Dongyu Xue, Yuning Shen, Lihao Wang, Yiming Ma, Yan Wang, Xinyou Wang, Xiangxin Zhou, Quanquan Gu
Recent years have witnessed a surge in the development of protein foundation models, significantly improving performance in protein prediction and generative tasks ranging from 3D structure prediction and protein design to conformational dynamics. However, the capabilities and limitations associated with these models remain poorly understood due to the absence of a unified evaluation framework. To fill this gap, we introduce ProteinBench, a holistic evaluation framework designed to enhance the transparency of protein foundation models. Our approach consists of three key components: (i) A taxonomic classification of tasks that broadly encompass the main challenges in the protein domain, based on the relationships between different protein modalities; (ii) A multi-metric evaluation approach that assesses performance across four key dimensions: quality, novelty, diversity, and robustness; and (iii) In-depth analyses from various user objectives, providing a holistic view of model performance. Our comprehensive evaluation of protein foundation models reveals several key findings that shed light on their current capabilities and limitations. To promote transparency and facilitate further research, we release the evaluation dataset, code, and a public leaderboard publicly for further analysis and a general modular toolkit. We intend for ProteinBench to be a living benchmark for establishing a standardized, in-depth evaluation framework for protein foundation models, driving their development and application while fostering collaboration within the field.
Read more9/12/2024
0
GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models
Zicheng Liu, Jiahui Li, Siyuan Li, Zelin Zang, Cheng Tan, Yufei Huang, Yajing Bai, Stan Z. Li
The Genomic Foundation Model (GFM) paradigm is expected to facilitate the extraction of generalizable representations from massive genomic data, thereby enabling their application across a spectrum of downstream applications. Despite advancements, a lack of evaluation framework makes it difficult to ensure equitable assessment due to experimental settings, model intricacy, benchmark datasets, and reproducibility challenges. In the absence of standardization, comparative analyses risk becoming biased and unreliable. To surmount this impasse, we introduce GenBench, a comprehensive benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. Through systematic evaluations of datasets spanning diverse biological domains with a particular emphasis on both short-range and long-range genomic tasks, firstly including the three most important DNA tasks covering Coding Region, Non-Coding Region, Genome Structure, etc. Moreover, We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance. Our findings reveal an interesting observation: independent of the number of parameters, the discernible difference in preference between the attention-based and convolution-based models on short- and long-range tasks may provide insights into the future design of GFM.
Read more6/6/2024
✨
0
Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathology
Peter Neidlinger, Omar S. M. El Nahhas, Hannah Sophie Muti, Tim Lenz, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Marko van Treeck, Rupert Langer, Bastian Dislich, Hans Michael Behrens, Christoph Rocken, Sebastian Foersch, Daniel Truhn, Antonio Marra, Oliver Lester Saldanha, Jakob Nikolas Kather
Advancements in artificial intelligence have driven the development of numerous pathology foundation models capable of extracting clinically relevant information. However, there is currently limited literature independently evaluating these foundation models on truly external cohorts and clinically-relevant tasks to uncover adjustments for future improvements. In this study, we benchmarked ten histopathology foundation models on 13 patient cohorts with 6,791 patients and 9,493 slides from lung, colorectal, gastric, and breast cancers. The models were evaluated on weakly-supervised tasks related to biomarkers, morphological properties, and prognostic outcomes. We show that a vision-language foundation model, CONCH, yielded the highest performance in 42% of tasks when compared to vision-only foundation models. The experiments reveal that foundation models trained on distinct cohorts learn complementary features to predict the same label, and can be fused to outperform the current state of the art. Creating an ensemble of complementary foundation models outperformed CONCH in 66% of tasks. Moreover, our findings suggest that data diversity outweighs data volume for foundation models. Our work highlights actionable adjustments to improve pathology foundation models.
Read more8/29/2024
🖼️
0
Foundation Model-oriented Robustness: Robust Image Model Evaluation with Pretrained Models
Peiyan Zhang, Haoyang Liu, Chaozhuo Li, Xing Xie, Sunghun Kim, Haohan Wang
Machine learning has demonstrated remarkable performance over finite datasets, yet whether the scores over the fixed benchmarks can sufficiently indicate the model's performance in the real world is still in discussion. In reality, an ideal robust model will probably behave similarly to the oracle (e.g., the human users), thus a good evaluation protocol is probably to evaluate the models' behaviors in comparison to the oracle. In this paper, we introduce a new robustness measurement that directly measures the image classification model's performance compared with a surrogate oracle (i.e., a foundation model). Besides, we design a simple method that can accomplish the evaluation beyond the scope of the benchmarks. Our method extends the image datasets with new samples that are sufficiently perturbed to be distinct from the ones in the original sets, but are still bounded within the same image-label structure the original test image represents, constrained by a foundation model pretrained with a large amount of samples. As a result, our new method will offer us a new way to evaluate the models' robustness performance, free of limitations of fixed benchmarks or constrained perturbations, although scoped by the power of the oracle. In addition to the evaluation results, we also leverage our generated data to understand the behaviors of the model and our new evaluation strategies.
Read more5/17/2024