GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models

Read original: arXiv:2406.01627 - Published 6/6/2024 by Zicheng Liu, Jiahui Li, Siyuan Li, Zelin Zang, Cheng Tan, Yufei Huang, Yajing Bai, Stan Z. Li
Total Score

0

GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents GenBench, a benchmarking suite for systematically evaluating the performance of genomic foundation models.
  • Genomic foundation models are large-scale machine learning models trained on vast amounts of genomic data, aiming to capture the complex patterns and relationships within biological sequences.
  • GenBench provides a comprehensive set of tasks and datasets to assess the capabilities of these models in various genomic applications, such as sequence classification, feature-based performance prediction, and graph-based representation learning.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces GenBench, a tool that helps researchers and developers evaluate the performance of large machine learning models designed to understand genomic data. These models, called "genomic foundation models," are trained on vast amounts of genetic information to uncover the complex patterns and relationships within biological sequences, such as DNA and RNA.

GenBench provides a comprehensive set of tasks and datasets that can be used to assess how well these genomic foundation models perform on a variety of applications. For example, the benchmark can test a model's ability to classify DNA sequences, predict the performance of certain genomic features, and learn graph-based representations of genetic information. This type of systematic evaluation can help researchers and developers identify the strengths and weaknesses of their genomic foundation models, allowing them to improve the models and advance the field of genomic machine learning.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces GenBench, a comprehensive benchmarking suite for evaluating the performance of genomic foundation models. Genomic foundation models are large-scale machine learning models trained on vast amounts of genomic data, with the goal of capturing the complex patterns and relationships within biological sequences.

GenBench provides a diverse set of tasks and datasets to assess the capabilities of these models across various genomic applications. The benchmark includes tasks such as sequence classification, where the model must predict the function or property of a given DNA or RNA sequence, as well as feature-based performance prediction, where the model must predict the performance of certain genomic features. Additionally, GenBench includes tasks that evaluate the models' ability to learn graph-based representations of genetic information, which can be useful for tasks like complex knowledge reasoning and code generation.

The paper describes the design and implementation of GenBench, including the selection of tasks, datasets, and evaluation metrics. The authors also demonstrate the use of GenBench by evaluating several state-of-the-art genomic foundation models and discussing the insights gained from the benchmark results.

Critical Analysis

The GenBench benchmarking suite presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of genomic machine learning. By providing a comprehensive and standardized set of tasks and datasets, the authors have created a powerful tool for researchers and developers to systematically evaluate the performance of their genomic foundation models.

One potential limitation of the benchmark is the scope of the tasks and datasets included. While the paper claims the benchmark covers a wide range of genomic applications, it's possible that certain specialized or emerging tasks are not represented. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that the benchmark can be expanded over time to keep pace with the rapidly evolving field of genomic machine learning.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential biases or limitations of the datasets used in the benchmark. It's essential to carefully consider the quality, diversity, and representativeness of the training and evaluation data to ensure that the benchmarking results are reliable and generalizable.

Overall, the GenBench benchmarking suite is a significant step forward in the systematic evaluation of genomic foundation models. By providing a common framework for assessing model performance, the authors have laid the groundwork for more robust and comparable research in this important field.

Conclusion

The GenBench paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking suite for evaluating the performance of genomic foundation models, which are large-scale machine learning models trained on vast amounts of genomic data. The benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks and datasets that cover a range of genomic applications, from sequence classification to graph-based representation learning.

By providing a standardized framework for assessing model performance, GenBench can help researchers and developers identify the strengths and weaknesses of their genomic foundation models, ultimately driving the advancement of the field. The paper demonstrates the use of GenBench and discusses the insights gained from evaluating several state-of-the-art models.

While the benchmark has some potential limitations in terms of scope and dataset quality, the GenBench suite represents a significant contribution to the field of genomic machine learning. As the field continues to evolve, the authors suggest that the benchmark can be expanded and refined to keep pace with the latest developments, further enhancing our understanding of these powerful genomic foundation models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models
Total Score

0

GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models

Zicheng Liu, Jiahui Li, Siyuan Li, Zelin Zang, Cheng Tan, Yufei Huang, Yajing Bai, Stan Z. Li

The Genomic Foundation Model (GFM) paradigm is expected to facilitate the extraction of generalizable representations from massive genomic data, thereby enabling their application across a spectrum of downstream applications. Despite advancements, a lack of evaluation framework makes it difficult to ensure equitable assessment due to experimental settings, model intricacy, benchmark datasets, and reproducibility challenges. In the absence of standardization, comparative analyses risk becoming biased and unreliable. To surmount this impasse, we introduce GenBench, a comprehensive benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. Through systematic evaluations of datasets spanning diverse biological domains with a particular emphasis on both short-range and long-range genomic tasks, firstly including the three most important DNA tasks covering Coding Region, Non-Coding Region, Genome Structure, etc. Moreover, We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance. Our findings reveal an interesting observation: independent of the number of parameters, the discernible difference in preference between the attention-based and convolution-based models on short- and long-range tasks may provide insights into the future design of GFM.

Read more

6/6/2024

ProteinBench: A Holistic Evaluation of Protein Foundation Models
Total Score

0

ProteinBench: A Holistic Evaluation of Protein Foundation Models

Fei Ye, Zaixiang Zheng, Dongyu Xue, Yuning Shen, Lihao Wang, Yiming Ma, Yan Wang, Xinyou Wang, Xiangxin Zhou, Quanquan Gu

Recent years have witnessed a surge in the development of protein foundation models, significantly improving performance in protein prediction and generative tasks ranging from 3D structure prediction and protein design to conformational dynamics. However, the capabilities and limitations associated with these models remain poorly understood due to the absence of a unified evaluation framework. To fill this gap, we introduce ProteinBench, a holistic evaluation framework designed to enhance the transparency of protein foundation models. Our approach consists of three key components: (i) A taxonomic classification of tasks that broadly encompass the main challenges in the protein domain, based on the relationships between different protein modalities; (ii) A multi-metric evaluation approach that assesses performance across four key dimensions: quality, novelty, diversity, and robustness; and (iii) In-depth analyses from various user objectives, providing a holistic view of model performance. Our comprehensive evaluation of protein foundation models reveals several key findings that shed light on their current capabilities and limitations. To promote transparency and facilitate further research, we release the evaluation dataset, code, and a public leaderboard publicly for further analysis and a general modular toolkit. We intend for ProteinBench to be a living benchmark for establishing a standardized, in-depth evaluation framework for protein foundation models, driving their development and application while fostering collaboration within the field.

Read more

9/12/2024

💬

Total Score

0

The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models

Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Ji Yong Cho, Shayne Longpre, Chaeeun Kim, Dongkeun Yoon, Guijin Son, Yejin Cho, Sheikh Shafayat, Jinheon Baek, Sue Hyun Park, Hyeonbin Hwang, Jinkyung Jo, Hyowon Cho, Haebin Shin, Seongyun Lee, Hanseok Oh, Noah Lee, Namgyu Ho, Se June Joo, Miyoung Ko, Yoonjoo Lee, Hyungjoo Chae, Jamin Shin, Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Bill Yuchen Lin, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee, Minjoon Seo

As language models (LMs) become capable of handling a wide range of tasks, their evaluation is becoming as challenging as their development. Most generation benchmarks currently assess LMs using abstract evaluation criteria like helpfulness and harmlessness, which often lack the flexibility and granularity of human assessment. Additionally, these benchmarks tend to focus disproportionately on specific capabilities such as instruction following, leading to coverage bias. To overcome these limitations, we introduce the BiGGen Bench, a principled generation benchmark designed to thoroughly evaluate nine distinct capabilities of LMs across 77 diverse tasks. A key feature of the BiGGen Bench is its use of instance-specific evaluation criteria, closely mirroring the nuanced discernment of human evaluation. We apply this benchmark to assess 103 frontier LMs using five evaluator LMs. Our code, data, and evaluation results are all publicly available at https://github.com/prometheus-eval/prometheus-eval/tree/main/BiGGen-Bench.

Read more

6/11/2024

Text-space Graph Foundation Models: Comprehensive Benchmarks and New Insights
Total Score

0

Text-space Graph Foundation Models: Comprehensive Benchmarks and New Insights

Zhikai Chen, Haitao Mao, Jingzhe Liu, Yu Song, Bingheng Li, Wei Jin, Bahare Fatemi, Anton Tsitsulin, Bryan Perozzi, Hui Liu, Jiliang Tang

Given the ubiquity of graph data and its applications in diverse domains, building a Graph Foundation Model (GFM) that can work well across different graphs and tasks with a unified backbone has recently garnered significant interests. A major obstacle to achieving this goal stems from the fact that graphs from different domains often exhibit diverse node features. Inspired by multi-modal models that align different modalities with natural language, the text has recently been adopted to provide a unified feature space for diverse graphs. Despite the great potential of these text-space GFMs, current research in this field is hampered by two problems. First, the absence of a comprehensive benchmark with unified problem settings hinders a clear understanding of the comparative effectiveness and practical value of different text-space GFMs. Second, there is a lack of sufficient datasets to thoroughly explore the methods' full potential and verify their effectiveness across diverse settings. To address these issues, we conduct a comprehensive benchmark providing novel text-space datasets and comprehensive evaluation under unified problem settings. Empirical results provide new insights and inspire future research directions. Our code and data are publicly available from url{https://github.com/CurryTang/TSGFM}.

Read more

6/18/2024