Provable Benefit of Annealed Langevin Monte Carlo for Non-log-concave Sampling
0
🌿
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper analyzes the benefits of using an annealed Langevin Monte Carlo (ALMC) algorithm for sampling from non-log-concave distributions.
- The researchers provide theoretical guarantees on the convergence rate of the ALMC algorithm, showing it can outperform standard Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) methods.
- The paper demonstrates the practical advantages of ALMC through numerical experiments on several non-log-concave sampling problems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the problem of sampling from probability distributions that are not "log-concave" - a technical term meaning the distribution has a curved shape that is not convex. This type of sampling is important for various machine learning and statistical applications, but can be challenging with standard sampling methods.
The researchers propose using an "annealed Langevin Monte Carlo" (ALMC) algorithm to sample from these non-log-concave distributions. ALMC works by gradually changing the distribution being sampled from, starting with an easier-to-sample distribution and slowly transitioning to the target distribution. This gradual "annealing" process allows the algorithm to efficiently explore the target distribution, even when it has a complex, non-convex shape.
The key theoretical result of the paper is that ALMC can provably converge to the target distribution faster than standard Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) methods, which do not use annealing. This means ALMC can provide more accurate samples in less computational time, an important practical advantage.
The researchers back up their theoretical analysis with numerical experiments on several non-log-concave sampling problems, demonstrating the superior performance of ALMC compared to LMC. These examples illustrate how ALMC can be a powerful tool for sampling from complex probability distributions that arise in machine learning and statistics.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the problem of sampling from non-log-concave distributions, which are challenging for standard Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods like Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC). The researchers propose using an annealed Langevin Monte Carlo (ALMC) algorithm to address this challenge.
ALMC works by gradually changing the target distribution being sampled from, starting from an easier-to-sample distribution and slowly transitioning to the final, non-log-concave target distribution. This "annealing" process allows the algorithm to efficiently explore the complex target distribution.
The key theoretical contribution of the paper is to provide convergence rate guarantees for ALMC, showing that it can converge to the target distribution faster than standard LMC methods. Specifically, the researchers prove that ALMC can achieve a faster convergence rate in terms of the number of gradient evaluations required.
To support their theoretical analysis, the researchers conduct numerical experiments on several non-log-concave sampling problems, including Gaussian mixture models and robust regression. These experiments demonstrate the practical advantages of ALMC over LMC, with ALMC providing more accurate samples in less computational time.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical and empirical analysis of the benefits of using ALMC for non-log-concave sampling. The authors carefully address potential issues, such as the need for accurate estimation of the gradient of the target distribution, and discuss strategies to mitigate these challenges.
One potential limitation of the ALMC approach is the requirement to carefully tune the annealing schedule, which can be challenging in practice. The paper does not provide detailed guidelines on how to choose the annealing schedule parameters, which could be an area for further research.
Additionally, the paper focuses on non-log-concave sampling in relatively low-dimensional settings. It would be valuable to see how ALMC scales to high-dimensional problems, which are common in many machine learning applications.
Overall, the paper makes a strong case for the use of ALMC as a powerful tool for sampling from complex, non-log-concave distributions. The theoretical guarantees and empirical results demonstrate the potential benefits of this approach, and the work serves as a valuable contribution to the field of MCMC methods.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a compelling analysis of the Provable Benefit of Annealed Langevin Monte Carlo for Non-log-concave Sampling. The researchers introduce an annealed Langevin Monte Carlo (ALMC) algorithm and provide theoretical guarantees on its convergence rate, showing it can outperform standard Langevin Monte Carlo methods for sampling from non-log-concave distributions.
The paper's theoretical and empirical results highlight the practical advantages of ALMC, which can provide more accurate samples in less computational time compared to other sampling techniques. This work contributes to the ongoing efforts to develop efficient and robust MCMC methods for complex probability distributions, with potential applications in machine learning, statistics, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
0
Provable Benefit of Annealed Langevin Monte Carlo for Non-log-concave Sampling
Wei Guo, Molei Tao, Yongxin Chen
We address the outstanding problem of sampling from an unnormalized density that may be non-log-concave and multimodal. To enhance the performance of simple Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, techniques of annealing type have been widely used. However, quantitative theoretical guarantees of these techniques are under-explored. This study takes a first step toward providing a non-asymptotic analysis of annealed MCMC. Specifically, we establish, for the first time, an oracle complexity of $widetilde{O}left(frac{dbeta^2{cal A}^2}{varepsilon^6}right)$ for simple annealed Langevin Monte Carlo algorithm to achieve $varepsilon^2$ accuracy in Kullback-Leibler divergence to the target distribution $pipropto{rm e}^{-V}$ on $mathbb{R}^d$ with $beta$-smooth potential $V$. Here, ${cal A}$ represents the action of a curve of probability measures interpolating the target distribution $pi$ and a readily sampleable distribution.
Read more7/25/2024
💬
0
Non-Log-Concave and Nonsmooth Sampling via Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms
Tim Tsz-Kit Lau, Han Liu, Thomas Pock
We study the problem of approximate sampling from non-log-concave distributions, e.g., Gaussian mixtures, which is often challenging even in low dimensions due to their multimodality. We focus on performing this task via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods derived from discretizations of the overdamped Langevin diffusions, which are commonly known as Langevin Monte Carlo algorithms. Furthermore, we are also interested in two nonsmooth cases for which a large class of proximal MCMC methods have been developed: (i) a nonsmooth prior is considered with a Gaussian mixture likelihood; (ii) a Laplacian mixture distribution. Such nonsmooth and non-log-concave sampling tasks arise from a wide range of applications to Bayesian inference and imaging inverse problems such as image deconvolution. We perform numerical simulations to compare the performance of most commonly used Langevin Monte Carlo algorithms.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Tamed Langevin sampling under weaker conditions
Iosif Lytras, Panayotis Mertikopoulos
Motivated by applications to deep learning which often fail standard Lipschitz smoothness requirements, we examine the problem of sampling from distributions that are not log-concave and are only weakly dissipative, with log-gradients allowed to grow superlinearly at infinity. In terms of structure, we only assume that the target distribution satisfies either a log-Sobolev or a Poincar'e inequality and a local Lipschitz smoothness assumption with modulus growing possibly polynomially at infinity. This set of assumptions greatly exceeds the operational limits of the vanilla unadjusted Langevin algorithm (ULA), making sampling from such distributions a highly involved affair. To account for this, we introduce a taming scheme which is tailored to the growth and decay properties of the target distribution, and we provide explicit non-asymptotic guarantees for the proposed sampler in terms of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, total variation, and Wasserstein distance to the target distribution.
Read more5/29/2024
🛸
0
Penalized Overdamped and Underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms for Constrained Sampling
Mert Gurbuzbalaban, Yuanhan Hu, Lingjiong Zhu
We consider the constrained sampling problem where the goal is to sample from a target distribution $pi(x)propto e^{-f(x)}$ when $x$ is constrained to lie on a convex body $mathcal{C}$. Motivated by penalty methods from continuous optimization, we propose penalized Langevin Dynamics (PLD) and penalized underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo (PULMC) methods that convert the constrained sampling problem into an unconstrained sampling problem by introducing a penalty function for constraint violations. When $f$ is smooth and gradients are available, we get $tilde{mathcal{O}}(d/varepsilon^{10})$ iteration complexity for PLD to sample the target up to an $varepsilon$-error where the error is measured in the TV distance and $tilde{mathcal{O}}(cdot)$ hides logarithmic factors. For PULMC, we improve the result to $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{d}/varepsilon^{7})$ when the Hessian of $f$ is Lipschitz and the boundary of $mathcal{C}$ is sufficiently smooth. To our knowledge, these are the first convergence results for underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo methods in the constrained sampling that handle non-convex $f$ and provide guarantees with the best dimension dependency among existing methods with deterministic gradient. If unbiased stochastic estimates of the gradient of $f$ are available, we propose PSGLD and PSGULMC methods that can handle stochastic gradients and are scaleable to large datasets without requiring Metropolis-Hasting correction steps. For PSGLD and PSGULMC, when $f$ is strongly convex and smooth, we obtain $tilde{mathcal{O}}(d/varepsilon^{18})$ and $tilde{mathcal{O}}(dsqrt{d}/varepsilon^{39})$ iteration complexity in W2 distance. When $f$ is smooth and can be non-convex, we provide finite-time performance bounds and iteration complexity results. Finally, we illustrate the performance on Bayesian LASSO regression and Bayesian constrained deep learning problems.
Read more4/16/2024