Provable Interactive Learning with Hindsight Instruction Feedback
2404.09123
0
0
Abstract
We study interactive learning in a setting where the agent has to generate a response (e.g., an action or trajectory) given a context and an instruction. In contrast, to typical approaches that train the system using reward or expert supervision on response, we study learning with hindsight instruction where a teacher provides an instruction that is most suitable for the agent's generated response. This hindsight labeling of instruction is often easier to provide than providing expert supervision of the optimal response which may require expert knowledge or can be impractical to elicit. We initiate the theoretical analysis of interactive learning with hindsight labeling. We first provide a lower bound showing that in general, the regret of any algorithm must scale with the size of the agent's response space. We then study a specialized setting where the underlying instruction-response distribution can be decomposed as a low-rank matrix. We introduce an algorithm called LORIL for this setting and show that its regret scales as $sqrt{T}$ where $T$ is the number of rounds and depends on the intrinsic rank but does not depend on the size of the agent's response space. We provide experiments in two domains showing that LORIL outperforms baselines even when the low-rank assumption is violated.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores a new approach to interactive learning called "Provable Interactive Learning with Hindsight Instruction Feedback".
- The core idea is to leverage "hindsight instruction feedback" - feedback on the agent's actions provided after the fact - to improve the agent's learning and decision-making.
- The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the performance of this approach and demonstrate its effectiveness through various experiments.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers present a new way for artificial intelligence (AI) systems to learn and improve their decision-making abilities through interactive feedback. The key insight is to use "hindsight instruction feedback" - that is, feedback on the AI's actions provided after the fact, rather than in real-time.
The researchers show that by incorporating this hindsight feedback, the AI system can learn more effectively and make better decisions over time. This is especially useful in complex, dynamic environments where providing real-time feedback can be challenging or impractical.
For example, imagine training an AI to control a self-driving car. Instead of trying to provide feedback on every single decision the car makes, the researchers' approach would allow the car to learn from a review of its actions after the fact. This could lead to more robust and reliable decision-making, with theoretical guarantees on the system's performance.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through various experiments, highlighting its potential to advance the field of interactive machine learning and decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new framework called "Provable Interactive Learning with Hindsight Instruction Feedback" (PIL-HIF), which leverages hindsight instruction feedback to improve an agent's learning and decision-making abilities.
In this framework, the agent interacts with an environment and receives feedback on its actions, but this feedback is provided after the fact, rather than in real-time. The authors show that by incorporating this hindsight feedback, the agent can learn more efficiently and make better decisions over time.
Mathematically, the authors formulate the problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and provide theoretical guarantees on the agent's performance, including bounds on the regret (the difference between the agent's cumulative reward and the optimal cumulative reward). They also demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on various tasks, such as [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/learning-decentralized-linear-quadratic-regulator-dollarsqrttdollar-regret] and [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/hindsight-priors-reward-learning-from-human-preferences].
The key contributions of this work include:
- The introduction of the PIL-HIF framework, which leverages hindsight instruction feedback to improve learning and decision-making.
- Theoretical guarantees on the agent's performance, including regret bounds.
- Experimental validation of the approach on a range of tasks, showcasing its effectiveness.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to interactive learning with strong theoretical guarantees. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
- The authors assume that the hindsight feedback provided to the agent is accurate and unbiased. In real-world scenarios, this feedback may be noisy or subject to human biases, which could impact the agent's learning.
- The experiments in the paper are conducted in relatively simple, simulated environments. It would be valuable to see how the PIL-HIF approach performs in more complex, real-world settings, where the dynamics and feedback mechanisms may be less well-defined.
- The paper does not address the challenge of effectively communicating the agent's decision-making process to human users. Interpretability and transparency are crucial for building trust and acceptance in interactive AI systems.
[link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/sequential-decision-making-expert-demonstrations-under-unobserved], [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-agents-learn-causal-world-models], and [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/distributed-no-regret-learning-multi-stage-systems] are related works that explore different aspects of interactive learning and decision-making that could provide valuable insights for extending and improving the PIL-HIF approach.
Conclusion
This research paper introduces a novel framework called "Provable Interactive Learning with Hindsight Instruction Feedback" (PIL-HIF), which leverages post-facto feedback on an agent's actions to improve its learning and decision-making. The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the agent's performance and demonstrate the approach's effectiveness through various experiments.
The PIL-HIF framework represents an important step forward in the field of interactive machine learning, offering a promising way to address the challenges of providing real-time feedback in complex, dynamic environments. While the paper identifies some potential limitations, the insights and techniques presented here could inspire further advancements in this area, with significant implications for a wide range of applications, from autonomous systems to human-AI collaboration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
New!Adversarial Online Learning with Temporal Feedback Graphs
Khashayar Gatmiry, Jon Schneider
0
0
We study a variant of prediction with expert advice where the learner's action at round $t$ is only allowed to depend on losses on a specific subset of the rounds (where the structure of which rounds' losses are visible at time $t$ is provided by a directed feedback graph known to the learner). We present a novel learning algorithm for this setting based on a strategy of partitioning the losses across sub-cliques of this graph. We complement this with a lower bound that is tight in many practical settings, and which we conjecture to be within a constant factor of optimal. For the important class of transitive feedback graphs, we prove that this algorithm is efficiently implementable and obtains the optimal regret bound (up to a universal constant).
7/2/2024
🏅
Reinforcement Learning with Lookahead Information
Nadav Merlis
0
0
We study reinforcement learning (RL) problems in which agents observe the reward or transition realizations at their current state before deciding which action to take. Such observations are available in many applications, including transactions, navigation and more. When the environment is known, previous work shows that this lookahead information can drastically increase the collected reward. However, outside of specific applications, existing approaches for interacting with unknown environments are not well-adapted to these observations. In this work, we close this gap and design provably-efficient learning algorithms able to incorporate lookahead information. To achieve this, we perform planning using the empirical distribution of the reward and transition observations, in contrast to vanilla approaches that only rely on estimated expectations. We prove that our algorithms achieve tight regret versus a baseline that also has access to lookahead information - linearly increasing the amount of collected reward compared to agents that cannot handle lookahead information.
6/5/2024
Do LLM Agents Have Regret? A Case Study in Online Learning and Games
Chanwoo Park, Xiangyu Liu, Asuman Ozdaglar, Kaiqing Zhang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly employed for (interactive) decision-making, via the development of LLM-based autonomous agents. Despite their emerging successes, the performance of LLM agents in decision-making has not been fully investigated through quantitative metrics, especially in the multi-agent setting when they interact with each other, a typical scenario in real-world LLM-agent applications. To better understand the limits of LLM agents in these interactive environments, we propose to study their interactions in benchmark decision-making settings in online learning and game theory, through the performance metric of emph{regret}. We first empirically study the {no-regret} behaviors of LLMs in canonical (non-stationary) online learning problems, as well as the emergence of equilibria when LLM agents interact through playing repeated games. We then provide some theoretical insights into the no-regret behaviors of LLM agents, under certain assumptions on the supervised pre-training and the rationality model of human decision-makers who generate the data. Notably, we also identify (simple) cases where advanced LLMs such as GPT-4 fail to be no-regret. To promote the no-regret behaviors, we propose a novel emph{unsupervised} training loss of emph{regret-loss}, which, in contrast to the supervised pre-training loss, does not require the labels of (optimal) actions. We then establish the statistical guarantee of generalization bound for regret-loss minimization, followed by the optimization guarantee that minimizing such a loss may automatically lead to known no-regret learning algorithms. Our further experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our regret-loss, especially in addressing the above ``regrettable'' cases.
5/28/2024
📈
Provably Efficient Interactive-Grounded Learning with Personalized Reward
Mengxiao Zhang, Yuheng Zhang, Haipeng Luo, Paul Mineiro
0
0
Interactive-Grounded Learning (IGL) [Xie et al., 2021] is a powerful framework in which a learner aims at maximizing unobservable rewards through interacting with an environment and observing reward-dependent feedback on the taken actions. To deal with personalized rewards that are ubiquitous in applications such as recommendation systems, Maghakian et al. [2022] study a version of IGL with context-dependent feedback, but their algorithm does not come with theoretical guarantees. In this work, we consider the same problem and provide the first provably efficient algorithms with sublinear regret under realizability. Our analysis reveals that the step-function estimator of prior work can deviate uncontrollably due to finite-sample effects. Our solution is a novel Lipschitz reward estimator which underestimates the true reward and enjoys favorable generalization performances. Building on this estimator, we propose two algorithms, one based on explore-then-exploit and the other based on inverse-gap weighting. We apply IGL to learning from image feedback and learning from text feedback, which are reward-free settings that arise in practice. Experimental results showcase the importance of using our Lipschitz reward estimator and the overall effectiveness of our algorithms.
6/3/2024