Public Technologies Transforming Work of the Public and the Public Sector
0
š
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how the adoption of a digital platform called OneStop by various building departments in the U.S. has impacted the work practices of both public sector employees and external stakeholders.
- The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 stakeholders, including local business owners, construction experts, community representatives, and building department employees, to investigate their experiences with the technology transition.
- The study reveals a multifaceted perspective on the impacts of OneStop, highlighting tensions around standardization, equality, and equity in the public sector's technology adoption.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how a new digital platform called OneStop, used by several building departments across the U.S., has changed the way public sector employees and the public interact. OneStop aims to integrate various steps and services into a single online point of contact between the public sector and the public.
The researchers spoke with 22 different people, including local business owners, construction experts, community members, and building department employees, to understand their experiences with this new technology. They found that OneStop has had both positive and negative impacts on these different groups.
For local business owners, OneStop made it harder for them to have face-to-face interactions with department employees, which they felt was an important part of their work. This exacerbated existing inequitable practices.
For the public sector employees, OneStop standardized their work practices, reflecting the priorities and values of the building department. This transition to new technology changed how they communicated and made decisions.
The researchers discuss the tensions this technology transition has caused around ensuring equal and equitable access and treatment for all stakeholders. They provide design implications for how to build more equitable practices into the public sector's use of technology.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with 22 stakeholders engaged with the OneStop digital platform deployed by several building departments in the U.S. The stakeholders included local business owners, experts involved in the construction process, community representatives, and building department employees.
Through thematic analysis of the interview data, the study uncovered a multifaceted perspective on the impacts of OneStop. For local business owners, the transition to the online platform exacerbated inequitable practices due to the loss of face-to-face interactions with department employees, which had previously been an important part of their work.
For the public sector employees, OneStop standardized their work practices, representing the building department's priorities and values. This technological change impacted their communication and decision-making processes. The findings highlight the need for a more nuanced, [ML-supported] toolkit to address the tensions around standardization, equality, and equity in the public sector's technology adoption.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into the unintended consequences that can arise from the public sector's adoption of new technologies, particularly in terms of their impact on different stakeholder groups. The researchers acknowledge that their findings are limited to the specific context of the OneStop platform and building departments, and further research would be needed to understand the generalizability of the results.
One potential area for further exploration is the role of user-centered design and community engagement in the development and deployment of such platforms. The paper suggests that more attention to equitable practices and the needs of diverse stakeholders could help mitigate the issues observed. Additionally, the study does not delve into the potential long-term effects of the technology transition on the public sector's relationships with external stakeholders and the broader community.
Conclusion
This paper provides a nuanced understanding of how the adoption of a digital platform in the public sector can impact the work practices of both internal and external stakeholders. The researchers highlight the tensions around standardization, equality, and equity that can arise from such technological transitions, underscoring the importance of designing for equitable access and participation. The insights from this study can inform the development and deployment of future public sector technologies to better meet the needs of diverse stakeholder groups and foster more inclusive, collaborative work practices.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
0
Public Technologies Transforming Work of the Public and the Public Sector
Seyun Kim, Bonnie Fan, Willa Yunqi Yang, Jessie Ramey, Sarah E Fox, Haiyi Zhu, John Zimmerman, Motahhare Eslami
Technologies adopted by the public sector have transformed the work practices of employees in public agencies by creating different means of communication and decision-making. Although much of the recent research in the future of work domain has concentrated on the effects of technological advancements on public sector employees, the influence on work practices of external stakeholders engaging with this sector remains under-explored. In this paper, we focus on a digital platform called OneStop which is deployed by several building departments across the U.S. and aims to integrate various steps and services into a single point of online contact between public sector employees and the public. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 22 stakeholders, including local business owners, experts involved in the construction process, community representatives, and building department employees, we investigate how this technology transition has impacted the work of these different stakeholders. We observe a multifaceted perspective and experience caused by the adoption of OneStop. OneStop exacerbated inequitable practices for local business owners due to a lack of face-to-face interactions with the department employees. For the public sector employees, OneStop standardized the work practices, representing the building department's priorities and values. Based on our findings, we discuss tensions around standardization, equality, and equity in technology transition, as well as design implications for equitable practices in the public sector.
Read more5/30/2024
0
The use of the open innovation paradigm in the public sector: a systematic review of published studies
Joel Alves de Lima J'unior, Kiev Gama, Jorge da Silva Correia Neto
The use of the open innovation paradigm has been, over the past years, getting special attention in the public sector. Motivated by an urban environment that is increasingly more complex and challenging, several government agencies have been allocating financial resources and efforts to promote open and participative government initiatives. As a way to try and understand this scenario, a systematic review of the literature was conducted, to provide a comprehensive analysis of the scientific papers that were published, seeking to capture, classify, evaluate and synthesize how the use of this paradigm has been put into practice in the public sector. In total, 4,741 preliminary studies were analyzed. From this number, only 37 articles were classified as potentially relevant and moved forward, going through the process of data extraction and analysis. From the data obtained, it was possible to verify that the use of this paradigm started to be reported with a higher frequency in the literature since 2013 and, among the main findings, we highlight the reports of experiences, approach propositions, of understanding how the phenomenon occurs and theoretical reflections. It was also possible to verify that the use of open innovation through social media was one of the pioneer techniques of engagement between the public sector and citizens. In conclusion, the reports confirm that the main challenges of this paradigm applied to the public sector are associated with their respective bureaucratic aspects, therefore lacking a bigger reflection on the procedures and methods to be used in the public sphere.
Read more4/10/2024
š
0
The influence of Automated Decision-Making systems in the context of street-level bureaucrats' practices
Manuel Portela, A. Paula Rodriguez Muller, Luca Tangi
In an era of digital governance, the use of automation for individual and cooperative work is increasing in public administrations (Tangi et al., 2022). Despite the promises of efficiency and cost reduction, automation could bring new challenges to the governance schemes. Regional, national, and local governments are taking measures to regulate and measure the impact of automated decision-making systems (ADMS). This research focuses on the use and adoption of ADMS in European public administrations to understand how these systems have been transforming the roles, tasks, and duties of street-level bureaucrats. We conducted a qualitative study in which we interviewed street-level bureaucrats from three administrations who had used an ADMS for several years, which was embedded in their daily work routines. The outcome of our research is an analysis of five dimensions of how collaborative work, the organizational settings, the capacities of bureaucrats and the implementation of the ADMS enable or limit the capacities for offering better services towards the citizens.
Read more7/30/2024
š¤
0
Studying Up Public Sector AI: How Networks of Power Relations Shape Agency Decisions Around AI Design and Use
Anna Kawakami, Amanda Coston, Hoda Heidari, Kenneth Holstein, Haiyi Zhu
As public sector agencies rapidly introduce new AI tools in high-stakes domains like social services, it becomes critical to understand how decisions to adopt these tools are made in practice. We borrow from the anthropological practice to ``study up'' those in positions of power, and reorient our study of public sector AI around those who have the power and responsibility to make decisions about the role that AI tools will play in their agency. Through semi-structured interviews and design activities with 16 agency decision-makers, we examine how decisions about AI design and adoption are influenced by their interactions with and assumptions about other actors within these agencies (e.g., frontline workers and agency leaders), as well as those above (legal systems and contracted companies), and below (impacted communities). By centering these networks of power relations, our findings shed light on how infrastructural, legal, and social factors create barriers and disincentives to the involvement of a broader range of stakeholders in decisions about AI design and adoption. Agency decision-makers desired more practical support for stakeholder involvement around public sector AI to help overcome the knowledge and power differentials they perceived between them and other stakeholders (e.g., frontline workers and impacted community members). Building on these findings, we discuss implications for future research and policy around actualizing participatory AI approaches in public sector contexts.
Read more5/22/2024