PURE: Turning Polysemantic Neurons Into Pure Features by Identifying Relevant Circuits

Read original: arXiv:2404.06453 - Published 4/10/2024 by Maximilian Dreyer, Erblina Purelku, Johanna Vielhaben, Wojciech Samek, Sebastian Lapuschkin
Total Score

0

PURE: Turning Polysemantic Neurons Into Pure Features by Identifying Relevant Circuits

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel method called PURE (Polysemantic Unsupervised Relevant Extraction) for turning polysemantic neurons (neurons that respond to multiple concepts) into "pure" features that are specific to a single concept.
  • The proposed technique aims to identify relevant neural circuits that are responsible for a specific concept, allowing for more interpretable and meaningful representations in deep learning models.
  • The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of PURE on various computer vision tasks, showing improved performance and better understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms.

Plain English Explanation

Deep learning models, such as those used for image recognition, often rely on complex neural networks with neurons that respond to multiple concepts or features in an image. This can make it difficult to interpret and understand the inner workings of these models.

The PURE method proposed in this paper aims to address this issue by identifying the specific neural circuits within the model that are responsible for a particular concept. By isolating these relevant circuits, the researchers can extract "pure" features that are directly associated with a single concept, rather than a mix of different concepts.

This is achieved by analyzing the model's activations and identifying the neurons that are most strongly correlated with a specific concept. The researchers then use a clustering algorithm to group these neurons into relevant circuits, which can be used to extract the pure features.

The key benefit of this approach is that it allows for more interpretable and meaningful representations in deep learning models. By understanding which neural circuits are responsible for specific concepts, researchers and developers can gain better insights into how the models are making decisions, which can be valuable for debugging, improving, and explaining the models' behavior.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of PURE on several computer vision tasks, showing that it can improve model performance while also providing a better understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms. This work represents an important step towards making deep learning models more transparent and trustworthy.

Technical Explanation

The PURE method works by first identifying polysemantic neurons, which are neurons that respond to multiple concepts or features in an image. This is done by analyzing the model's activations on a set of training images and identifying neurons with high mutual information across multiple concepts.

Next, the researchers use a clustering algorithm to group the polysemantic neurons into relevant circuits, based on their patterns of activation. This allows them to identify the specific neural circuits that are responsible for each concept.

Once the relevant circuits have been identified, the researchers can extract "pure" features that are directly associated with a single concept. This is done by selecting the neurons within each relevant circuit and using their activations as the new feature representation.

The researchers evaluate the PURE method on several computer vision tasks, including image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation. They show that the pure features extracted by PURE can improve model performance compared to using the original, polysemantic neuron activations.

Additionally, the researchers provide visualizations and analyses to demonstrate how PURE can help to better understand the inner workings of deep learning models. By identifying the relevant neural circuits for specific concepts, they can gain insights into the underlying mechanisms that the models are using to make decisions.

Critical Analysis

One potential limitation of the PURE method is that it relies on the availability of labeled training data to identify the relevant concepts and group the polysemantic neurons accordingly. In some domains, such data may not be readily available, which could limit the applicability of the method.

Additionally, the clustering algorithm used to group the polysemantic neurons into relevant circuits may not always be able to perfectly separate the different concepts, particularly in cases where there are complex interactions or overlaps between them. This could introduce some noise or uncertainty in the extracted pure features.

It would be interesting to see how the PURE method performs on more challenging or adversarial datasets, where the models may be more prone to developing polysemantic neurons as a way to cope with the complexity of the data. This could help to further assess the robustness and generalizability of the approach.

Overall, the PURE method represents an important contribution to the field of interpretable machine learning, as it provides a way to extract more meaningful and transparent representations from deep learning models. By better understanding the inner workings of these models, researchers and developers can work towards more trustworthy and explainable artificial intelligence systems.

Conclusion

The PURE method proposed in this paper offers a novel approach for turning polysemantic neurons in deep learning models into pure features that are directly associated with specific concepts. By identifying the relevant neural circuits responsible for each concept, the researchers can extract more interpretable and meaningful representations, which can lead to improved model performance and a better understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms.

This work aligns with the broader trend towards more explainable and transparent artificial intelligence, as it provides a way to gain insights into the inner workings of deep learning models. As these models become increasingly important in a wide range of applications, the ability to understand and interpret their decision-making processes will be crucial for building trust and ensuring their responsible deployment.

Overall, the PURE method represents an important step forward in the field of interpretable machine learning, and the researchers' findings suggest that it could have significant implications for the development of more robust and trustworthy AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

PURE: Turning Polysemantic Neurons Into Pure Features by Identifying Relevant Circuits
Total Score

0

PURE: Turning Polysemantic Neurons Into Pure Features by Identifying Relevant Circuits

Maximilian Dreyer, Erblina Purelku, Johanna Vielhaben, Wojciech Samek, Sebastian Lapuschkin

The field of mechanistic interpretability aims to study the role of individual neurons in Deep Neural Networks. Single neurons, however, have the capability to act polysemantically and encode for multiple (unrelated) features, which renders their interpretation difficult. We present a method for disentangling polysemanticity of any Deep Neural Network by decomposing a polysemantic neuron into multiple monosemantic virtual neurons. This is achieved by identifying the relevant sub-graph (circuit) for each pure feature. We demonstrate how our approach allows us to find and disentangle various polysemantic units of ResNet models trained on ImageNet. While evaluating feature visualizations using CLIP, our method effectively disentangles representations, improving upon methods based on neuron activations. Our code is available at https://github.com/maxdreyer/PURE.

Read more

4/10/2024

Learning from Emergence: A Study on Proactively Inhibiting the Monosemantic Neurons of Artificial Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Learning from Emergence: A Study on Proactively Inhibiting the Monosemantic Neurons of Artificial Neural Networks

Jiachuan Wang, Shimin Di, Lei Chen, Charles Wang Wai Ng

Recently, emergence has received widespread attention from the research community along with the success of large-scale models. Different from the literature, we hypothesize a key factor that promotes the performance during the increase of scale: the reduction of monosemantic neurons that can only form one-to-one correlations with specific features. Monosemantic neurons tend to be sparser and have negative impacts on the performance in large models. Inspired by this insight, we propose an intuitive idea to identify monosemantic neurons and inhibit them. However, achieving this goal is a non-trivial task as there is no unified quantitative evaluation metric and simply banning monosemantic neurons does not promote polysemanticity in neural networks. Therefore, we first propose a new metric to measure the monosemanticity of neurons with the guarantee of efficiency for online computation, then introduce a theoretically supported method to suppress monosemantic neurons and proactively promote the ratios of polysemantic neurons in training neural networks. We validate our conjecture that monosemanticity brings about performance change at different model scales on a variety of neural networks and benchmark datasets in different areas, including language, image, and physics simulation tasks. Further experiments validate our analysis and theory regarding the inhibition of monosemanticity.

Read more

6/21/2024

The Local Interaction Basis: Identifying Computationally-Relevant and Sparsely Interacting Features in Neural Networks
Total Score

0

The Local Interaction Basis: Identifying Computationally-Relevant and Sparsely Interacting Features in Neural Networks

Lucius Bushnaq, Stefan Heimersheim, Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Dan Braun, Jake Mendel, Kaarel Hanni, Avery Griffin, Jorn Stohler, Magdalena Wache, Marius Hobbhahn

Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the behavior of neural networks by reverse-engineering their internal computations. However, current methods struggle to find clear interpretations of neural network activations because a decomposition of activations into computational features is missing. Individual neurons or model components do not cleanly correspond to distinct features or functions. We present a novel interpretability method that aims to overcome this limitation by transforming the activations of the network into a new basis - the Local Interaction Basis (LIB). LIB aims to identify computational features by removing irrelevant activations and interactions. Our method drops irrelevant activation directions and aligns the basis with the singular vectors of the Jacobian matrix between adjacent layers. It also scales features based on their importance for downstream computation, producing an interaction graph that shows all computationally-relevant features and interactions in a model. We evaluate the effectiveness of LIB on modular addition and CIFAR-10 models, finding that it identifies more computationally-relevant features that interact more sparsely, compared to principal component analysis. However, LIB does not yield substantial improvements in interpretability or interaction sparsity when applied to language models. We conclude that LIB is a promising theory-driven approach for analyzing neural networks, but in its current form is not applicable to large language models.

Read more

5/21/2024

Encourage or Inhibit Monosemanticity? Revisit Monosemanticity from a Feature Decorrelation Perspective
Total Score

0

Encourage or Inhibit Monosemanticity? Revisit Monosemanticity from a Feature Decorrelation Perspective

Hanqi Yan, Yanzheng Xiang, Guangyi Chen, Yifei Wang, Lin Gui, Yulan He

To better interpret the intrinsic mechanism of large language models (LLMs), recent studies focus on monosemanticity on its basic units. A monosemantic neuron is dedicated to a single and specific concept, which forms a one-to-one correlation between neurons and concepts. Despite extensive research in monosemanticity probing, it remains unclear whether monosemanticity is beneficial or harmful to model capacity. To explore this question, we revisit monosemanticity from the feature decorrelation perspective and advocate for its encouragement. We experimentally observe that the current conclusion by wang2024learning, which suggests that decreasing monosemanticity enhances model performance, does not hold when the model changes. Instead, we demonstrate that monosemanticity consistently exhibits a positive correlation with model capacity, in the preference alignment process. Consequently, we apply feature correlation as a proxy for monosemanticity and incorporate a feature decorrelation regularizer into the dynamic preference optimization process. The experiments show that our method not only enhances representation diversity and activation sparsity but also improves preference alignment performance.

Read more

6/27/2024