PuzzleVQA: Diagnosing Multimodal Reasoning Challenges of Language Models with Abstract Visual Patterns
2403.13315
0
0
Abstract
Large multimodal models extend the impressive capabilities of large language models by integrating multimodal understanding abilities. However, it is not clear how they can emulate the general intelligence and reasoning ability of humans. As recognizing patterns and abstracting concepts are key to general intelligence, we introduce PuzzleVQA, a collection of puzzles based on abstract patterns. With this dataset, we evaluate large multimodal models with abstract patterns based on fundamental concepts, including colors, numbers, sizes, and shapes. Through our experiments on state-of-the-art large multimodal models, we find that they are not able to generalize well to simple abstract patterns. Notably, even GPT-4V cannot solve more than half of the puzzles. To diagnose the reasoning challenges in large multimodal models, we progressively guide the models with our ground truth reasoning explanations for visual perception, inductive reasoning, and deductive reasoning. Our systematic analysis finds that the main bottlenecks of GPT-4V are weaker visual perception and inductive reasoning abilities. Through this work, we hope to shed light on the limitations of large multimodal models and how they can better emulate human cognitive processes in the future (Our data and code will be released publicly at https://github.com/declare-lab/LLM-PuzzleTest).
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces the PuzzleVQA dataset, which is designed to diagnose the multimodal reasoning challenges faced by AI models
- Explores how abstract visual patterns can reveal insights into the reasoning capabilities of language models
- Provides a benchmark for evaluating the performance of models on complex multimodal reasoning tasks
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents the PuzzleVQA dataset, which is designed to test the multimodal reasoning capabilities of AI models. Rather than using real-world images, PuzzleVQA utilizes abstract visual patterns that are paired with questions. This allows the researchers to isolate specific reasoning skills and identify the challenges that models face when dealing with complex multimodal information.
By using abstract patterns instead of natural images, the researchers can better understand the underlying cognitive processes involved in multimodal reasoning. The patterns are carefully designed to require different types of reasoning, such as identifying patterns, solving puzzles, and understanding spatial relationships. The questions associated with these patterns are also designed to probe the models' ability to integrate visual and textual information and [reason about geometric and abstract concepts.
By using this carefully designed dataset, the researchers aim to identify the specific strengths and weaknesses of current AI models when it comes to multimodal reasoning. This information can then be used to inform the development of more robust and capable models that can better understand and reason about complex, real-world scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the PuzzleVQA dataset, which is designed to diagnose the multimodal reasoning challenges faced by AI models. The dataset consists of abstract visual patterns paired with questions that require different types of reasoning, such as pattern identification, puzzle solving, and spatial reasoning.
The researchers drew inspiration from cognitive theories, such as the Cattell-Horn theory of intelligence, which suggests that fluid intelligence (the ability to reason and solve novel problems) and crystallized intelligence (the ability to use acquired knowledge and skills) are distinct cognitive abilities. The PuzzleVQA dataset is designed to specifically test fluid intelligence by presenting models with unfamiliar visual patterns and reasoning challenges.
The dataset is composed of several categories of patterns, each with its own set of questions. These categories include simple geometric shapes, complex geometric patterns, and abstract visual puzzles. The questions associated with these patterns range from identifying specific elements to solving complex logical reasoning problems.
The researchers evaluated the performance of several state-of-the-art multimodal models on the PuzzleVQA dataset, including VIP-LLaVa, MM-PhyQA, and Marvel. The results revealed significant challenges for these models, with performance often lagging behind human-level performance, particularly on the more complex reasoning tasks.
Critical Analysis
The PuzzleVQA dataset presents a valuable contribution to the field of multimodal reasoning by providing a novel benchmark that specifically targets fluid intelligence. By using abstract visual patterns, the researchers are able to isolate the reasoning challenges faced by models, rather than having them confounded by the complexities of real-world images.
However, one potential limitation of the dataset is that the abstract patterns may not fully capture the richness and contextual information present in natural images. While this trade-off allows for a more controlled and diagnostic evaluation, it raises questions about the generalizability of the findings to real-world scenarios.
Additionally, the dataset focuses primarily on visual reasoning, and it would be interesting to see how the researchers could extend the approach to other modalities, such as audio or text. Incorporating a wider range of modalities could provide a more comprehensive understanding of multimodal reasoning abilities.
Another area for further research could be exploring the role of background knowledge and learning in multimodal reasoning. The current dataset assumes a clean separation between fluid and crystallized intelligence, but in practice, these cognitive abilities are often intertwined.
Conclusion
The PuzzleVQA dataset represents a significant advancement in the field of multimodal reasoning research. By shifting the focus away from natural images and towards abstract visual patterns, the researchers have developed a novel benchmark that can reveal the specific reasoning challenges faced by AI models.
The findings from this study highlight the need for continued progress in developing models that can truly integrate and reason about complex multimodal information. As AI systems become increasingly ubiquitous, the ability to understand and reason about the world in a holistic, human-like manner will be crucial.
The PuzzleVQA dataset provides a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners to diagnose and address the shortcomings of current multimodal models, paving the way for the creation of more robust and capable systems that can tackle a wide range of real-world challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
MARVEL: Multidimensional Abstraction and Reasoning through Visual Evaluation and Learning
Yifan Jiang, Jiarui Zhang, Kexuan Sun, Zhivar Sourati, Kian Ahrabian, Kaixin Ma, Filip Ilievski, Jay Pujara
0
0
While multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have shown significant progress on many popular visual reasoning benchmarks, whether they possess abstract visual reasoning abilities remains an open question. Similar to the Sudoku puzzles, abstract visual reasoning (AVR) problems require finding high-level patterns (e.g., repetition constraints) that control the input shapes (e.g., digits) in a specific task configuration (e.g., matrix). However, existing AVR benchmarks only considered a limited set of patterns (addition, conjunction), input shapes (rectangle, square), and task configurations (3 by 3 matrices). To evaluate MLLMs' reasoning abilities comprehensively, we introduce MARVEL, a multidimensional AVR benchmark with 770 puzzles composed of six core knowledge patterns, geometric and abstract shapes, and five different task configurations. To inspect whether the model accuracy is grounded in perception and reasoning, MARVEL complements the general AVR question with perception questions in a hierarchical evaluation framework. We conduct comprehensive experiments on MARVEL with nine representative MLLMs in zero-shot and few-shot settings. Our experiments reveal that all models show near-random performance on the AVR question, with significant performance gaps (40%) compared to humans across all patterns and task configurations. Further analysis of perception questions reveals that MLLMs struggle to comprehend the visual features (near-random performance) and even count the panels in the puzzle ( <45%), hindering their ability for abstract reasoning. We release our entire code and dataset.
4/26/2024
What is the Visual Cognition Gap between Humans and Multimodal LLMs?
Xu Cao, Bolin Lai, Wenqian Ye, Yunsheng Ma, Joerg Heintz, Jintai Chen, Jianguo Cao, James M. Rehg
0
0
Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown great promise in language-guided perceptual tasks such as recognition, segmentation, and object detection. However, their effectiveness in addressing visual cognition problems that require high-level reasoning is not well-established. One such challenge is abstract visual reasoning (AVR) -- the cognitive ability to discern relationships among patterns in a set of images and extrapolate to predict subsequent patterns. This skill is crucial during the early neurodevelopmental stages of children. Inspired by the AVR tasks in Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC), we propose a new dataset MaRs-VQA and a new benchmark VCog-Bench containing three datasets to evaluate the zero-shot AVR capability of MLLMs and compare their performance with existing human intelligent investigation. Our comparative experiments with different open-source and closed-source MLLMs on the VCog-Bench revealed a gap between MLLMs and human intelligence, highlighting the visual cognitive limitations of current MLLMs. We believe that the public release of VCog-Bench, consisting of MaRs-VQA, and the inference pipeline will drive progress toward the next generation of MLLMs with human-like visual cognition abilities.
6/18/2024
Solution for SMART-101 Challenge of CVPR Multi-modal Algorithmic Reasoning Task 2024
Jinwoo Ahn, Junhyeok Park, Min-Jun Kim, Kang-Hyeon Kim, So-Yeong Sohn, Yun-Ji Lee, Du-Seong Chang, Yu-Jung Heo, Eun-Sol Kim
0
0
In this paper, the solution of HYU MLLAB KT Team to the Multimodal Algorithmic Reasoning Task: SMART-101 CVPR 2024 Challenge is presented. Beyond conventional visual question-answering problems, the SMART-101 challenge aims to achieve human-level multimodal understanding by tackling complex visio-linguistic puzzles designed for children in the 6-8 age group. To solve this problem, we suggest two main ideas. First, to utilize the reasoning ability of a large-scale language model (LLM), the given visual cues (images) are grounded in the text modality. For this purpose, we generate highly detailed text captions that describe the context of the image and use these captions as input for the LLM. Second, due to the nature of puzzle images, which often contain various geometric visual patterns, we utilize an object detection algorithm to ensure these patterns are not overlooked in the captioning process. We employed the SAM algorithm, which can detect various-size objects, to capture the visual features of these geometric patterns and used this information as input for the LLM. Under the puzzle split configuration, we achieved an option selection accuracy Oacc of 29.5 on the test set and a weighted option selection accuracy (WOSA) of 27.1 on the challenge set.
6/11/2024
š¬
Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Survey
Panagiotis Giadikiaroglou, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Giorgos Stamou
0
0
Exploring the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in puzzle solving unveils critical insights into their potential and challenges in AI, marking a significant step towards understanding their applicability in complex reasoning tasks. This survey leverages a unique taxonomy -- dividing puzzles into rule-based and rule-less categories -- to critically assess LLMs through various methodologies, including prompting techniques, neuro-symbolic approaches, and fine-tuning. Through a critical review of relevant datasets and benchmarks, we assess LLMs' performance, identifying significant challenges in complex puzzle scenarios. Our findings highlight the disparity between LLM capabilities and human-like reasoning, particularly in those requiring advanced logical inference. The survey underscores the necessity for novel strategies and richer datasets to advance LLMs' puzzle-solving proficiency and contribute to AI's logical reasoning and creative problem-solving advancements.
4/23/2024