Quality-Diversity with Limited Resources

Read original: arXiv:2406.03731 - Published 6/7/2024 by Ren-Jian Wang, Ke Xue, Cong Guan, Chao Qian
Total Score

0

Quality-Diversity with Limited Resources

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the challenge of achieving quality-diverse solutions with limited computational resources.
  • Quality-diversity algorithms aim to find a set of high-performing and diverse solutions to a problem, but can be computationally expensive.
  • The authors propose a framework to make quality-diversity algorithms more resource-efficient, which could have applications in areas like generative design, open-ended learning, and context-aware AI generation.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a way to make quality-diversity algorithms more efficient. Quality-diversity algorithms try to find a variety of high-performing solutions to a problem. This is useful in areas like design, where you want a diverse set of good options to choose from. However, these algorithms can be computationally expensive to run.

The authors propose a framework to reduce the computational resources needed for quality-diversity algorithms. The key idea is to focus the search on the most promising areas, rather than exploring the entire space. This allows the algorithm to find a diverse set of good solutions without wasting resources on less promising areas.

This could be helpful in applications where computational resources are limited, such as when designing new products or training AI systems to generate diverse and contextual content. By making quality-diversity algorithms more efficient, the authors hope to make these powerful techniques more accessible and useful in real-world scenarios.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a framework called "Quality-Diversity with Limited Resources" (QDLR) to make quality-diversity algorithms more computationally efficient. Quality-diversity algorithms aim to find a set of high-performing and diverse solutions to a problem, but can be resource-intensive to run.

The key idea in QDLR is to focus the search on the most promising areas of the solution space, rather than exploring the entire space. This is achieved by using a two-stage approach:

  1. In the first stage, the algorithm quickly explores the space to identify promising regions. This is done using a computationally cheap "quality-diversity" algorithm that sacrifices some performance for speed.

  2. In the second stage, the algorithm focuses its computational resources on thoroughly exploring the promising regions identified in the first stage, using a more expensive but higher-performing quality-diversity algorithm.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of QDLR through experiments on various benchmark problems. They show that QDLR can achieve comparable solution quality to traditional quality-diversity algorithms, but with significantly lower computational cost.

This work has potential applications in areas like generative design, open-ended learning, and context-aware AI generation, where the ability to efficiently explore diverse high-performing solutions is valuable but computational resources may be limited.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a thoughtful analysis of the limitations and potential issues with their QDLR framework. They acknowledge that the performance of QDLR will depend on the choice of the "cheap" quality-diversity algorithm used in the first stage, and that this may require some domain-specific tuning.

Additionally, the authors note that QDLR may struggle in situations where the "promising" regions identified in the first stage do not actually contain the best solutions. In such cases, the second stage may miss out on important areas of the solution space.

While the experiments in the paper demonstrate the effectiveness of QDLR, it would be valuable to see how it performs on a wider range of problems, including real-world applications. The authors also do not provide any theoretical guarantees about the optimality or convergence properties of their approach, which could be an area for further research.

Overall, the QDLR framework represents a promising step towards making quality-diversity algorithms more practical and accessible, but there are still some open questions and potential limitations that warrant further investigation.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework called "Quality-Diversity with Limited Resources" (QDLR) that aims to make quality-diversity algorithms more computationally efficient. By focusing the search on the most promising regions of the solution space, QDLR can achieve comparable solution quality to traditional quality-diversity algorithms while using significantly fewer computational resources.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of QDLR through experiments, and discuss its potential applications in areas like generative design, open-ended learning, and context-aware AI generation. While the framework has some limitations, it represents an important step towards making quality-diversity algorithms more practical and accessible in real-world scenarios with limited computational resources.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Quality-Diversity with Limited Resources
Total Score

0

Quality-Diversity with Limited Resources

Ren-Jian Wang, Ke Xue, Cong Guan, Chao Qian

Quality-Diversity (QD) algorithms have emerged as a powerful optimization paradigm with the aim of generating a set of high-quality and diverse solutions. To achieve such a challenging goal, QD algorithms require maintaining a large archive and a large population in each iteration, which brings two main issues, sample and resource efficiency. Most advanced QD algorithms focus on improving the sample efficiency, while the resource efficiency is overlooked to some extent. Particularly, the resource overhead during the training process has not been touched yet, hindering the wider application of QD algorithms. In this paper, we highlight this important research question, i.e., how to efficiently train QD algorithms with limited resources, and propose a novel and effective method called RefQD to address it. RefQD decomposes a neural network into representation and decision parts, and shares the representation part with all decision parts in the archive to reduce the resource overhead. It also employs a series of strategies to address the mismatch issue between the old decision parts and the newly updated representation part. Experiments on different types of tasks from small to large resource consumption demonstrate the excellent performance of RefQD: it not only uses significantly fewer resources (e.g., 16% GPU memories on QDax and 3.7% on Atari) but also achieves comparable or better performance compared to sample-efficient QD algorithms. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/lamda-bbo/RefQD}.

Read more

6/7/2024

⚙️

Total Score

0

Quality Diversity for Robot Learning: Limitations and Future Directions

Sumeet Batra, Bryon Tjanaka, Stefanos Nikolaidis, Gaurav Sukhatme

Quality Diversity (QD) has shown great success in discovering high-performing, diverse policies for robot skill learning. While current benchmarks have led to the development of powerful QD methods, we argue that new paradigms must be developed to facilitate open-ended search and generalizability. In particular, many methods focus on learning diverse agents that each move to a different xy position in MAP-Elites-style bounded archives. Here, we show that such tasks can be accomplished with a single, goal-conditioned policy paired with a classical planner, achieving O(1) space complexity w.r.t. the number of policies and generalization to task variants. We hypothesize that this approach is successful because it extracts task-invariant structural knowledge by modeling a relational graph between adjacent cells in the archive. We motivate this view with emerging evidence from computational neuroscience and explore connections between QD and models of cognitive maps in human and other animal brains. We conclude with a discussion exploring the relationships between QD and cognitive maps, and propose future research directions inspired by cognitive maps towards future generalizable algorithms capable of truly open-ended search.

Read more

7/26/2024

Quality-Diversity Algorithms Can Provably Be Helpful for Optimization
Total Score

0

Quality-Diversity Algorithms Can Provably Be Helpful for Optimization

Chao Qian, Ke Xue, Ren-Jian Wang

Quality-Diversity (QD) algorithms are a new type of Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs), aiming to find a set of high-performing, yet diverse solutions. They have found many successful applications in reinforcement learning and robotics, helping improve the robustness in complex environments. Furthermore, they often empirically find a better overall solution than traditional search algorithms which explicitly search for a single highest-performing solution. However, their theoretical analysis is far behind, leaving many fundamental questions unexplored. In this paper, we try to shed some light on the optimization ability of QD algorithms via rigorous running time analysis. By comparing the popular QD algorithm MAP-Elites with $(mu+1)$-EA (a typical EA focusing on finding better objective values only), we prove that on two NP-hard problem classes with wide applications, i.e., monotone approximately submodular maximization with a size constraint, and set cover, MAP-Elites can achieve the (asymptotically) optimal polynomial-time approximation ratio, while $(mu+1)$-EA requires exponential expected time on some instances. This provides theoretical justification for that QD algorithms can be helpful for optimization, and discloses that the simultaneous search for high-performing solutions with diverse behaviors can provide stepping stones to good overall solutions and help avoid local optima.

Read more

5/7/2024

Large Language Models as In-context AI Generators for Quality-Diversity
Total Score

0

Large Language Models as In-context AI Generators for Quality-Diversity

Bryan Lim, Manon Flageat, Antoine Cully

Quality-Diversity (QD) approaches are a promising direction to develop open-ended processes as they can discover archives of high-quality solutions across diverse niches. While already successful in many applications, QD approaches usually rely on combining only one or two solutions to generate new candidate solutions. As observed in open-ended processes such as technological evolution, wisely combining large diversity of these solutions could lead to more innovative solutions and potentially boost the productivity of QD search. In this work, we propose to exploit the pattern-matching capabilities of generative models to enable such efficient solution combinations. We introduce In-context QD, a framework of techniques that aim to elicit the in-context capabilities of pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate interesting solutions using few-shot and many-shot prompting with quality-diverse examples from the QD archive as context. Applied to a series of common QD domains, In-context QD displays promising results compared to both QD baselines and similar strategies developed for single-objective optimization. Additionally, this result holds across multiple values of parameter sizes and archive population sizes, as well as across domains with distinct characteristics from BBO functions to policy search. Finally, we perform an extensive ablation that highlights the key prompt design considerations that encourage the generation of promising solutions for QD.

Read more

6/6/2024