Quantifying Multilingual Performance of Large Language Models Across Languages
2404.11553
0
0
Abstract
The development of Large Language Models (LLMs) relies on extensive text corpora, which are often unevenly distributed across languages. This imbalance results in LLMs performing significantly better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate. Currently, there is a lack of quantitative methods to evaluate the performance of LLMs in these low-resource languages. To address this gap, we propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations. By comparing the LLM's internal representation of various languages against a baseline derived from English, we can assess the model's multilingual capabilities in a robust and language-agnostic manner. Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores, underscoring the effectiveness of our metric in assessing language-specific capabilities. Besides, the experiments show that there is a strong correlation between the LLM's performance in different languages and the proportion of those languages in its pre-training corpus. These insights underscore the efficacy of the Language Ranker as a tool for evaluating LLM performance across different languages, particularly those with limited resources.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the multilingual performance of large language models (LLMs) across a diverse set of languages.
- The researchers developed a comprehensive framework to quantify the multilingual capabilities of LLMs, going beyond typical evaluation metrics.
- The paper explores factors that contribute to effective multilingual performance, such as vocabulary sharing and transfer learning.
- It also considers the cost-performance tradeoffs of processing low-resource languages and the cultural nuances that should be considered when evaluating LLM effectiveness.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. These models are often trained on a vast amount of data in multiple languages, allowing them to work with a wide range of languages. However, it's not always clear how well these models perform across different languages.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/survey-multilingual-large-language-models-corpora-alignment">This research paper</a> presents a comprehensive framework to measure the multilingual capabilities of LLMs. The researchers looked at factors like how well the models can handle different vocabularies, transfer learning (using knowledge from one language to improve performance in another), and the tradeoffs between cost and performance when processing less common languages.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/metal-towards-multilingual-meta-evaluation">They also considered the cultural nuances</a> that should be taken into account when evaluating the effectiveness of LLMs. For example, the models may struggle to understand context-specific references or idioms in certain languages.
By developing this detailed evaluation approach, the researchers aimed to provide a better understanding of how well LLMs can truly handle multilingual tasks, beyond just looking at standard performance metrics.
Technical Explanation
The researchers first developed a comprehensive framework, called <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/metal-towards-multilingual-meta-evaluation">METAL</a>, for quantifying the multilingual performance of LLMs. This framework goes beyond traditional evaluation metrics, such as perplexity or accuracy, to assess factors like the models' ability to handle diverse vocabularies and their capacity for cross-lingual transfer learning.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/how-vocabulary-sharing-facilitates-multilingualism-llama">The paper also investigates the role of vocabulary sharing</a> in enabling effective multilingual performance. By sharing vocabulary across languages, the models can better leverage their knowledge and improve their understanding of less common languages.
Additionally, the researchers explored the <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/cost-performance-optimization-processing-low-resource-language">cost-performance tradeoffs of processing low-resource languages</a>, which are often underrepresented in the training data for LLMs. They examined ways to optimize the efficiency of multilingual processing while maintaining high performance.
Finally, the paper discusses <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/beyond-metrics-evaluating-llms-effectiveness-culturally-nuanced">the importance of considering cultural nuances</a> when evaluating the effectiveness of LLMs. The models may struggle to understand context-specific references or idioms, which can impact their performance on real-world multilingual tasks.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their evaluation framework, while comprehensive, may not capture all aspects of multilingual performance. For example, the framework focuses on quantitative metrics, but there may be qualitative factors that are equally important in assessing the real-world effectiveness of LLMs.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or limitations that may arise from the training data used to develop these models. It's possible that the models could exhibit biases or struggles with certain languages or cultural contexts that are underrepresented in the data.
Further research could investigate the impact of different training approaches, such as using more diverse data sources or fine-tuning the models on specific language tasks, to improve their multilingual capabilities.
Conclusion
This paper presents a robust framework for quantifying the multilingual performance of large language models. By considering factors beyond traditional metrics, the researchers provide a more nuanced understanding of how well these models can handle a diverse range of languages.
The findings highlight the importance of vocabulary sharing, cost-performance optimization, and cultural awareness when developing and evaluating effective multilingual language models. These insights can inform the ongoing efforts to create AI systems that can truly communicate and engage with people from all over the world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Bias
Yuemei Xu, Ling Hu, Jiayi Zhao, Zihan Qiu, Yuqi Ye, Hanwen Gu
0
0
Based on the foundation of Large Language Models (LLMs), Multilingual Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been developed to address the challenges of multilingual natural language processing tasks, hoping to achieve knowledge transfer from high-resource to low-resource languages. However, significant limitations and challenges still exist, such as language imbalance, multilingual alignment, and inherent bias. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of MLLMs, delving deeply into discussions surrounding these critical issues. First of all, we start by presenting an overview of MLLMs, covering their evolution, key techniques, and multilingual capacities. Secondly, we explore widely utilized multilingual corpora for MLLMs' training and multilingual datasets oriented for downstream tasks that are crucial for enhancing the cross-lingual capability of MLLMs. Thirdly, we survey the existing studies on multilingual representations and investigate whether the current MLLMs can learn a universal language representation. Fourthly, we discuss bias on MLLMs including its category and evaluation metrics, and summarize the existing debiasing techniques. Finally, we discuss existing challenges and point out promising research directions. By demonstrating these aspects, this paper aims to facilitate a deeper understanding of MLLMs and their potentiality in various domains.
6/7/2024
1+1>2: Can Large Language Models Serve as Cross-Lingual Knowledge Aggregators?
Yue Huang, Chenrui Fan, Yuan Li, Siyuan Wu, Tianyi Zhou, Xiangliang Zhang, Lichao Sun
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention due to their remarkable ability to process information across various languages. Despite their capabilities, they exhibit inconsistencies in handling identical queries in different languages, presenting challenges for further advancement. This paper introduces a method to enhance the multilingual performance of LLMs by aggregating knowledge from diverse languages. This approach incorporates a low-resource knowledge detector specific to a language, a language selection process, and mechanisms for answer replacement and integration. Our experiments demonstrate notable performance improvements, particularly in reducing language performance disparity. An ablation study confirms that each component of our method significantly contributes to these enhancements. This research highlights the inherent potential of LLMs to harmonize multilingual capabilities and offers valuable insights for further exploration.
6/24/2024
š·ļø
Ranking LLMs by compression
Peijia Guo, Ziguang Li, Haibo Hu, Chao Huang, Ming Li, Rui Zhang
0
0
We conceptualize the process of understanding as information compression, and propose a method for ranking large language models (LLMs) based on lossless data compression. We demonstrate the equivalence of compression length under arithmetic coding with cumulative negative log probabilities when using a large language model as a prior, that is, the pre-training phase of the model is essentially the process of learning the optimal coding length. At the same time, the evaluation metric compression ratio can be obtained without actual compression, which greatly saves overhead. In this paper, we use five large language models as priors for compression, then compare their performance on challenging natural language processing tasks, including sentence completion, question answering, and coreference resolution. Experimental results show that compression ratio and model performance are positively correlated, so it can be used as a general metric to evaluate large language models.
6/21/2024
METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluation
Rishav Hada, Varun Gumma, Mohamed Ahmed, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
0
0
With the rising human-like precision of Large Language Models (LLMs) in numerous tasks, their utilization in a variety of real-world applications is becoming more prevalent. Several studies have shown that LLMs excel on many standard NLP benchmarks. However, it is challenging to evaluate LLMs due to test dataset contamination and the limitations of traditional metrics. Since human evaluations are difficult to collect, there is a growing interest in the community to use LLMs themselves as reference-free evaluators for subjective metrics. However, past work has shown that LLM-based evaluators can exhibit bias and have poor alignment with human judgments. In this study, we propose a framework for an end-to-end assessment of LLMs as evaluators in multilingual scenarios. We create a carefully curated dataset, covering 10 languages containing native speaker judgments for the task of summarization. This dataset is created specifically to evaluate LLM-based evaluators, which we refer to as meta-evaluation (METAL). We compare the performance of LLM-based evaluators created using GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, and PaLM2. Our results indicate that LLM-based evaluators based on GPT-4 perform the best across languages, while GPT-3.5-Turbo performs poorly. Additionally, we perform an analysis of the reasoning provided by LLM-based evaluators and find that it often does not match the reasoning provided by human judges.
4/3/2024