RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems

Read original: arXiv:2403.09040 - Published 8/13/2024 by Jennifer Hsia, Afreen Shaikh, Zhiruo Wang, Graham Neubig
Total Score

0

RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes the RAGGED framework, which aims to provide a structured approach for designing and evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems.
  • RAG systems integrate information retrieval and language generation to produce more informative and coherent outputs.
  • The RAGGED framework encompasses five key components: Retrieval, Augmentation, Generation, Evaluation, and Design.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces the RAGGED framework, which is a new way to think about and design retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. RAG systems are a type of AI that combines two main abilities:

  1. Information retrieval: The ability to search for and find relevant information from a large database or dataset.
  2. Language generation: The ability to take that information and use it to produce coherent and informative text.

The goal of RAG systems is to generate responses that are more informative and coherent than what a standalone language model could produce on its own. The RAGGED framework provides a structured approach to help researchers and developers <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/dr-rag-applying-dynamic-document-relevance-to">design and evaluate these types of systems</a>.

The framework has five key components:

  1. Retrieval: How the system finds and selects the most relevant information to use.
  2. Augmentation: How the retrieved information is combined with the original input to produce a more comprehensive understanding.
  3. Generation: The process of using the augmented information to generate the final output text.
  4. Evaluation: Measuring the quality and effectiveness of the generated outputs.
  5. Design: Guiding the overall development and optimization of the RAG system.

By following this framework, the researchers hope to <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/retrieval-augmented-generation-natural-language-processing-survey">improve the design and performance of RAG systems</a> and advance the field of natural language processing.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the RAGGED framework, which provides a structured approach for designing and evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. RAG systems integrate information retrieval and language generation to produce more informative and coherent outputs compared to standalone language models.

The RAGGED framework has five key components:

  1. Retrieval: This component focuses on how the system searches for and selects the most relevant information to use from a large corpus or database. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/searching-best-practices-retrieval-augmented-generation">Effective retrieval is critical</a> for the overall performance of the RAG system.

  2. Augmentation: This step involves combining the retrieved information with the original input in a way that provides a more comprehensive understanding for the language generation component.

  3. Generation: The augmented information is then used to generate the final output text, leveraging the system's language generation capabilities.

  4. Evaluation: The framework includes methodologies for measuring the quality and effectiveness of the generated outputs, allowing for iterative improvement of the RAG system.

  5. Design: Finally, the framework provides guidance on the overall development and optimization of RAG systems, helping researchers and developers <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/blended-rag-improving-rag-retriever-augmented-generation">design more effective systems</a>.

By following the RAGGED framework, the authors aim to advance the state-of-the-art in retrieval-augmented generation and promote more <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/evaluation-retrieval-augmented-generation-survey">rigorous evaluation</a> of these types of systems.

Critical Analysis

The RAGGED framework provides a comprehensive approach for designing and evaluating RAG systems, addressing key components such as retrieval, augmentation, and generation. However, the paper acknowledges certain limitations and areas for further research:

  • The framework does not provide specific implementation details, leaving room for researchers to develop their own approaches within each component.
  • Evaluating the performance of RAG systems can be challenging, as the framework relies on subjective measures of output quality and coherence.
  • The paper does not address potential biases or ethical considerations that may arise from the integration of information retrieval and language generation.

Further research is needed to refine the RAGGED framework and explore its practical applications in diverse domains. Researchers should also consider investigating the potential risks and societal implications of deploying these types of AI systems at scale.

Conclusion

The RAGGED framework proposed in this paper represents a significant step forward in the design and development of retrieval-augmented generation systems. By providing a structured approach that encompasses key components like retrieval, augmentation, and evaluation, the framework can help researchers and developers create more effective and informative AI-powered language models.

The potential impact of this work extends beyond academic research, as RAG systems could be applied to a wide range of real-world applications, such as question-answering, content generation, and decision support. As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, the RAGGED framework can serve as a valuable guide for <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/blended-rag-improving-rag-retriever-augmented-generation">advancing the state of the art in retrieval-augmented generation</a> and unlocking new possibilities for AI-driven language technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems
Total Score

0

RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems

Jennifer Hsia, Afreen Shaikh, Zhiruo Wang, Graham Neubig

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can significantly improve the performance of language models (LMs) by providing additional context for tasks such as document-based question answering (DBQA). However, the effectiveness of RAG is highly dependent on its configuration. To systematically find the optimal configuration, we introduce RAGGED, a framework for analyzing RAG configurations across various DBQA tasks. Using the framework, we discover distinct LM behaviors in response to varying context quantities, context qualities, and retrievers. For instance, while some models are robust to noisy contexts, monotonically performing better with more contexts, others are more noise-sensitive and can effectively use only a few contexts before declining in performance. This framework also provides a deeper analysis of these differences by evaluating the LMs' sensitivity to signal and noise under specific context quality conditions. Using RAGGED, researchers and practitioners can derive actionable insights about how to optimally configure their RAG systems for their specific question-answering tasks.

Read more

8/13/2024

DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answering
Total Score

0

DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answering

Zijian Hei, Weiling Liu, Wenjie Ou, Juyi Qiao, Junming Jiao, Guowen Song, Ting Tian, Yi Lin

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently demonstrated the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the knowledge-intensive tasks such as Question-Answering (QA). RAG expands the query context by incorporating external knowledge bases to enhance the response accuracy. However, it would be inefficient to access LLMs multiple times for each query and unreliable to retrieve all the relevant documents by a single query. We have found that even though there is low relevance between some critical documents and query, it is possible to retrieve the remaining documents by combining parts of the documents with the query. To mine the relevance, a two-stage retrieval framework called Dynamic-Relevant Retrieval-Augmented Generation (DR-RAG) is proposed to improve document retrieval recall and the accuracy of answers while maintaining efficiency. Additionally, a compact classifier is applied to two different selection strategies to determine the contribution of the retrieved documents to answering the query and retrieve the relatively relevant documents. Meanwhile, DR-RAG call the LLMs only once, which significantly improves the efficiency of the experiment. The experimental results on multi-hop QA datasets show that DR-RAG can significantly improve the accuracy of the answers and achieve new progress in QA systems.

Read more

6/18/2024

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
Total Score

0

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Natural Language Processing: A Survey

Shangyu Wu, Ying Xiong, Yufei Cui, Haolun Wu, Can Chen, Ye Yuan, Lianming Huang, Xue Liu, Tei-Wei Kuo, Nan Guan, Chun Jason Xue

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated great success in various fields, benefiting from their huge amount of parameters that store knowledge. However, LLMs still suffer from several key issues, such as hallucination problems, knowledge update issues, and lacking domain-specific expertise. The appearance of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which leverages an external knowledge database to augment LLMs, makes up those drawbacks of LLMs. This paper reviews all significant techniques of RAG, especially in the retriever and the retrieval fusions. Besides, tutorial codes are provided for implementing the representative techniques in RAG. This paper further discusses the RAG training, including RAG with/without datastore update. Then, we introduce the application of RAG in representative natural language processing tasks and industrial scenarios. Finally, this paper discusses the future directions and challenges of RAG for promoting its development.

Read more

7/22/2024

Searching for Best Practices in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Total Score

0

Searching for Best Practices in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Xiaohua Wang, Zhenghua Wang, Xuan Gao, Feiran Zhang, Yixin Wu, Zhibo Xu, Tianyuan Shi, Zhengyuan Wang, Shizheng Li, Qi Qian, Ruicheng Yin, Changze Lv, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques have proven to be effective in integrating up-to-date information, mitigating hallucinations, and enhancing response quality, particularly in specialized domains. While many RAG approaches have been proposed to enhance large language models through query-dependent retrievals, these approaches still suffer from their complex implementation and prolonged response times. Typically, a RAG workflow involves multiple processing steps, each of which can be executed in various ways. Here, we investigate existing RAG approaches and their potential combinations to identify optimal RAG practices. Through extensive experiments, we suggest several strategies for deploying RAG that balance both performance and efficiency. Moreover, we demonstrate that multimodal retrieval techniques can significantly enhance question-answering capabilities about visual inputs and accelerate the generation of multimodal content using a retrieval as generation strategy.

Read more

7/2/2024