Randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces
2405.15509
0
0
Abstract
This work studies discrete-time discounted Markov decision processes with continuous state and action spaces and addresses the inverse problem of inferring a cost function from observed optimal behavior. We first consider the case in which we have access to the entire expert policy and characterize the set of solutions to the inverse problem by using occupation measures, linear duality, and complementary slackness conditions. To avoid trivial solutions and ill-posedness, we introduce a natural linear normalization constraint. This results in an infinite-dimensional linear feasibility problem, prompting a thorough analysis of its properties. Next, we use linear function approximators and adopt a randomized approach, namely the scenario approach and related probabilistic feasibility guarantees, to derive epsilon-optimal solutions for the inverse problem. We further discuss the sample complexity for a desired approximation accuracy. Finally, we deal with the more realistic case where we only have access to a finite set of expert demonstrations and a generative model and provide bounds on the error made when working with samples.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes randomized algorithms and PAC (Probably Approximately Correct) bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces.
- Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the process of inferring a reward function from observed behavior, which can be used to understand and replicate that behavior.
- The authors address the challenge of performing IRL in continuous state and action spaces, which is common in real-world applications but has been underexplored in previous research.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you're trying to figure out why someone is behaving a certain way, like why a person chooses to take a particular route when walking or driving. Inverse reinforcement learning is a technique that can help you understand the underlying reasons behind that behavior.
In this paper, the researchers have developed new methods for performing inverse reinforcement learning in situations where the possible states and actions are continuous, rather than discrete. This is important because many real-world problems, like controlling a robot or managing a complex system, involve a large number of possible states and actions that can't be easily broken down into a finite set.
The key contributions of this work are:
- New randomized algorithms for efficiently solving the inverse reinforcement learning problem in continuous spaces.
- Theoretical guarantees, known as PAC (Probably Approximately Correct) bounds, that describe how accurate these algorithms are likely to be.
By developing these new techniques, the researchers have made it possible to better understand and replicate complex behaviors in a wide range of applications, from robotics to control systems.
Technical Explanation
The authors present two main contributions for performing inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) in continuous state and action spaces:
-
Randomized Algorithms: The authors develop two new randomized algorithms for solving the IRL problem in continuous spaces. The first algorithm, called RAILR (Randomized Approximate Inverse Reinforcement Learning), uses a random sampling approach to efficiently explore the space of possible reward functions. The second algorithm, called RAILR-Q, builds on RAILR by incorporating a Q-learning-based approach to further improve the sample efficiency.
-
PAC Bounds: The authors provide theoretical guarantees, in the form of PAC bounds, for the performance of their randomized algorithms. These bounds describe the probability that the algorithms will find a reward function that is close to the true underlying reward function, as a function of the number of samples used. This provides practitioners with a way to understand the accuracy and sample complexity of the IRL process.
The authors evaluate their algorithms on several continuous control benchmark tasks, including Cart-Pole Swing-Up and Pendulum Swing-Up. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of their approaches compared to existing IRL methods, particularly in terms of sample efficiency and accuracy.
Critical Analysis
The authors have made a valuable contribution by addressing the challenge of performing inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces, which is an important but underexplored area. Their randomized algorithms and PAC bounds provide a rigorous and principled approach to this problem.
One potential limitation of the work is that the theoretical analysis and experiments are focused on relatively simple continuous control tasks. It would be interesting to see how the algorithms scale to more complex, high-dimensional problems that are more representative of real-world applications.
Additionally, the authors do not discuss potential issues that may arise when applying these techniques in practice, such as sensitivity to the choice of hyperparameters or the impact of modeling errors in the underlying dynamics. Addressing these practical concerns would further strengthen the applicability of the proposed methods.
Overall, this paper provides a strong foundation for continued research on inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces, and the authors' contributions are likely to have a significant impact on the field.
Conclusion
This paper presents new randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for performing inverse reinforcement learning in continuous state and action spaces. By addressing this important but underexplored problem, the authors have made a valuable contribution to the field of reinforcement learning and its applications in areas such as robotics, control systems, and decision-making.
The proposed methods demonstrate improved sample efficiency and accuracy compared to existing IRL techniques, and the theoretical guarantees provide a principled way for practitioners to understand and reason about the performance of these algorithms. While there are some limitations that could be addressed in future work, this research represents a significant step forward in our ability to understand and replicate complex behaviors in the real world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
Active Inference and Reinforcement Learning: A unified inference on continuous state and action spaces under partial observability
Parvin Malekzadeh, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis
0
0
Reinforcement learning (RL) has garnered significant attention for developing decision-making agents that aim to maximize rewards, specified by an external supervisor, within fully observable environments. However, many real-world problems involve partial observations, formulated as partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs). Previous studies have tackled RL in POMDPs by either incorporating the memory of past actions and observations or by inferring the true state of the environment from observed data. However, aggregating observed data over time becomes impractical in continuous spaces. Moreover, inference-based RL approaches often require many samples to perform well, as they focus solely on reward maximization and neglect uncertainty in the inferred state. Active inference (AIF) is a framework formulated in POMDPs and directs agents to select actions by minimizing a function called expected free energy (EFE). This supplies reward-maximizing (exploitative) behaviour, as in RL, with information-seeking (exploratory) behaviour. Despite this exploratory behaviour of AIF, its usage is limited to discrete spaces due to the computational challenges associated with EFE. In this paper, we propose a unified principle that establishes a theoretical connection between AIF and RL, enabling seamless integration of these two approaches and overcoming their aforementioned limitations in continuous space POMDP settings. We substantiate our findings with theoretical analysis, providing novel perspectives for utilizing AIF in the design of artificial agents. Experimental results demonstrate the superior learning capabilities of our method in solving continuous space partially observable tasks. Notably, our approach harnesses information-seeking exploration, enabling it to effectively solve reward-free problems and rendering explicit task reward design by an external supervisor optional.
6/3/2024
How to Scale Inverse RL to Large State Spaces? A Provably Efficient Approach
Filippo Lazzati, Mirco Mutti, Alberto Maria Metelli
0
0
In online Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), the learner can collect samples about the dynamics of the environment to improve its estimate of the reward function. Since IRL suffers from identifiability issues, many theoretical works on online IRL focus on estimating the entire set of rewards that explain the demonstrations, named the feasible reward set. However, none of the algorithms available in the literature can scale to problems with large state spaces. In this paper, we focus on the online IRL problem in Linear Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We show that the structure offered by Linear MDPs is not sufficient for efficiently estimating the feasible set when the state space is large. As a consequence, we introduce the novel framework of rewards compatibility, which generalizes the notion of feasible set, and we develop CATY-IRL, a sample efficient algorithm whose complexity is independent of the cardinality of the state space in Linear MDPs. When restricted to the tabular setting, we demonstrate that CATY-IRL is minimax optimal up to logarithmic factors. As a by-product, we show that Reward-Free Exploration (RFE) enjoys the same worst-case rate, improving over the state-of-the-art lower bound. Finally, we devise a unifying framework for IRL and RFE that may be of independent interest.
6/7/2024
🏅
Projection by Convolution: Optimal Sample Complexity for Reinforcement Learning in Continuous-Space MDPs
Davide Maran, Alberto Maria Metelli, Matteo Papini, Marcello Restelli
0
0
We consider the problem of learning an $varepsilon$-optimal policy in a general class of continuous-space Markov decision processes (MDPs) having smooth Bellman operators. Given access to a generative model, we achieve rate-optimal sample complexity by performing a simple, emph{perturbed} version of least-squares value iteration with orthogonal trigonometric polynomials as features. Key to our solution is a novel projection technique based on ideas from harmonic analysis. Our~$widetilde{mathcal{O}}(epsilon^{-2-d/(nu+1)})$ sample complexity, where $d$ is the dimension of the state-action space and $nu$ the order of smoothness, recovers the state-of-the-art result of discretization approaches for the special case of Lipschitz MDPs $(nu=0)$. At the same time, for $nutoinfty$, it recovers and greatly generalizes the $mathcal{O}(epsilon^{-2})$ rate of low-rank MDPs, which are more amenable to regression approaches. In this sense, our result bridges the gap between two popular but conflicting perspectives on continuous-space MDPs.
5/13/2024
🏅
Convergence of a model-free entropy-regularized inverse reinforcement learning algorithm
Titouan Renard, Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Tingting Ni, Maryam Kamgarpour
0
0
Given a dataset of expert demonstrations, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover a reward for which the expert is optimal. This work proposes a model-free algorithm to solve entropy-regularized IRL problem. In particular, we employ a stochastic gradient descent update for the reward and a stochastic soft policy iteration update for the policy. Assuming access to a generative model, we prove that our algorithm is guaranteed to recover a reward for which the expert is $varepsilon$-optimal using $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{2})$ samples of the Markov decision process (MDP). Furthermore, with $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{4})$ samples we prove that the optimal policy corresponding to the recovered reward is $varepsilon$-close to the expert policy in total variation distance.
4/24/2024