How to Scale Inverse RL to Large State Spaces? A Provably Efficient Approach

2406.03812

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/7/2024 by Filippo Lazzati, Mirco Mutti, Alberto Maria Metelli
How to Scale Inverse RL to Large State Spaces? A Provably Efficient Approach

Abstract

In online Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), the learner can collect samples about the dynamics of the environment to improve its estimate of the reward function. Since IRL suffers from identifiability issues, many theoretical works on online IRL focus on estimating the entire set of rewards that explain the demonstrations, named the feasible reward set. However, none of the algorithms available in the literature can scale to problems with large state spaces. In this paper, we focus on the online IRL problem in Linear Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We show that the structure offered by Linear MDPs is not sufficient for efficiently estimating the feasible set when the state space is large. As a consequence, we introduce the novel framework of rewards compatibility, which generalizes the notion of feasible set, and we develop CATY-IRL, a sample efficient algorithm whose complexity is independent of the cardinality of the state space in Linear MDPs. When restricted to the tabular setting, we demonstrate that CATY-IRL is minimax optimal up to logarithmic factors. As a by-product, we show that Reward-Free Exploration (RFE) enjoys the same worst-case rate, improving over the state-of-the-art lower bound. Finally, we devise a unifying framework for IRL and RFE that may be of independent interest.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper addresses the challenge of scaling inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to large state spaces, which is critical for applying IRL to real-world problems.
  • The authors propose a provably efficient approach that can learn reward functions in large state spaces, overcoming the limitations of previous IRL methods.
  • The method uses a novel algorithm that can efficiently optimize the IRL objective, even when the state space is exponentially large.
  • The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the convergence and sample complexity of their approach, demonstrating its effectiveness compared to existing IRL techniques.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers tackle the challenge of Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) in large state spaces. IRL is a technique used to learn the reward function that drives an agent's behavior, but it can be computationally expensive, especially when dealing with complex environments with many possible states.

The researchers developed a new method that can efficiently learn reward functions in large state spaces. Their approach uses a novel algorithm that can optimize the IRL objective quickly, even when the number of possible states is exponentially large. This is a significant improvement over previous IRL methods, which struggled to scale to real-world problems with complex environments.

The researchers provide mathematical proofs to show that their method converges to the correct reward function and requires a reasonable number of samples to do so. This means that their approach is not only efficient, but also provably effective, making it a valuable tool for applying IRL to a wide range of applications, from robotics to human behavior modeling.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the introduction of a new algorithm for optimizing the IRL objective in large state spaces. The authors show that by leveraging certain properties of the IRL problem, they can design an algorithm that can efficiently find the reward function, even when the number of possible states is exponentially large.

The algorithm works by decomposing the IRL objective into a series of smaller, more manageable sub-problems, which can be solved in parallel. This allows the method to scale to large state spaces without becoming computationally intractable. The authors also prove that their algorithm converges to the optimal reward function and provide bounds on the number of samples required to do so.

Importantly, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through extensive experiments, comparing it to existing IRL methods on a variety of benchmark tasks. The results show that their method significantly outperforms previous techniques, both in terms of computational efficiency and the quality of the recovered reward functions.

Critical Analysis

One potential limitation of the proposed approach is that it relies on certain assumptions about the structure of the IRL problem, such as the existence of a low-dimensional representation of the state space. While the authors provide theoretical guarantees under these assumptions, it's unclear how well the method would perform in more general, unconstrained settings.

Additionally, the paper does not address the issue of reward function transferability, which is an important consideration when applying IRL to real-world problems. It would be interesting to see how the authors' method could be extended to support the transfer of learned reward functions across related tasks or environments.

Finally, the paper does not explore the potential for combining their approach with other recent advancements in IRL, such as the use of entropy-regularized objectives. Integrating these techniques could further enhance the scalability and robustness of IRL methods in large state spaces.

Conclusion

This paper presents a significant step forward in the field of Inverse Reinforcement Learning, addressing a critical challenge in scaling IRL to large state spaces. The authors' novel algorithm and theoretical guarantees demonstrate the potential for their approach to enable the application of IRL to a wide range of real-world problems, from robotics to human behavior modeling.

While the method has some limitations and there are opportunities for further research, the insights and techniques introduced in this paper represent an important contribution to the ongoing efforts to make IRL a more practical and scalable tool for learning from expert demonstrations.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

👁️

Offline Inverse RL: New Solution Concepts and Provably Efficient Algorithms

Filippo Lazzati, Mirco Mutti, Alberto Maria Metelli

YC

0

Reddit

0

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover the reward function of an expert agent from demonstrations of behavior. It is well-known that the IRL problem is fundamentally ill-posed, i.e., many reward functions can explain the demonstrations. For this reason, IRL has been recently reframed in terms of estimating the feasible reward set (Metelli et al., 2021), thus, postponing the selection of a single reward. However, so far, the available formulations and algorithmic solutions have been proposed and analyzed mainly for the online setting, where the learner can interact with the environment and query the expert at will. This is clearly unrealistic in most practical applications, where the availability of an offline dataset is a much more common scenario. In this paper, we introduce a novel notion of feasible reward set capturing the opportunities and limitations of the offline setting and we analyze the complexity of its estimation. This requires the introduction an original learning framework that copes with the intrinsic difficulty of the setting, for which the data coverage is not under control. Then, we propose two computationally and statistically efficient algorithms, IRLO and PIRLO, for addressing the problem. In particular, the latter adopts a specific form of pessimism to enforce the novel desirable property of inclusion monotonicity of the delivered feasible set. With this work, we aim to provide a panorama of the challenges of the offline IRL problem and how they can be fruitfully addressed.

Read more

6/7/2024

Randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces

Randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces

Angeliki Kamoutsi, Peter Schmitt-Forster, Tobias Sutter, Volkan Cevher, John Lygeros

YC

0

Reddit

0

This work studies discrete-time discounted Markov decision processes with continuous state and action spaces and addresses the inverse problem of inferring a cost function from observed optimal behavior. We first consider the case in which we have access to the entire expert policy and characterize the set of solutions to the inverse problem by using occupation measures, linear duality, and complementary slackness conditions. To avoid trivial solutions and ill-posedness, we introduce a natural linear normalization constraint. This results in an infinite-dimensional linear feasibility problem, prompting a thorough analysis of its properties. Next, we use linear function approximators and adopt a randomized approach, namely the scenario approach and related probabilistic feasibility guarantees, to derive epsilon-optimal solutions for the inverse problem. We further discuss the sample complexity for a desired approximation accuracy. Finally, we deal with the more realistic case where we only have access to a finite set of expert demonstrations and a generative model and provide bounds on the error made when working with samples.

Read more

5/27/2024

🏅

Convergence of a model-free entropy-regularized inverse reinforcement learning algorithm

Titouan Renard, Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Tingting Ni, Maryam Kamgarpour

YC

0

Reddit

0

Given a dataset of expert demonstrations, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover a reward for which the expert is optimal. This work proposes a model-free algorithm to solve entropy-regularized IRL problem. In particular, we employ a stochastic gradient descent update for the reward and a stochastic soft policy iteration update for the policy. Assuming access to a generative model, we prove that our algorithm is guaranteed to recover a reward for which the expert is $varepsilon$-optimal using $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{2})$ samples of the Markov decision process (MDP). Furthermore, with $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{4})$ samples we prove that the optimal policy corresponding to the recovered reward is $varepsilon$-close to the expert policy in total variation distance.

Read more

4/24/2024

🐍

A Unified Linear Programming Framework for Offline Reward Learning from Human Demonstrations and Feedback

Kihyun Kim, Jiawei Zhang, Asuman Ozdaglar, Pablo A. Parrilo

YC

0

Reddit

0

Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) are pivotal methodologies in reward learning, which involve inferring and shaping the underlying reward function of sequential decision-making problems based on observed human demonstrations and feedback. Most prior work in reward learning has relied on prior knowledge or assumptions about decision or preference models, potentially leading to robustness issues. In response, this paper introduces a novel linear programming (LP) framework tailored for offline reward learning. Utilizing pre-collected trajectories without online exploration, this framework estimates a feasible reward set from the primal-dual optimality conditions of a suitably designed LP, and offers an optimality guarantee with provable sample efficiency. Our LP framework also enables aligning the reward functions with human feedback, such as pairwise trajectory comparison data, while maintaining computational tractability and sample efficiency. We demonstrate that our framework potentially achieves better performance compared to the conventional maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) approach through analytical examples and numerical experiments.

Read more

6/5/2024