RDF Stream Taxonomy: Systematizing RDF Stream Types in Research and Practice
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a taxonomy to systematize different types of RDF streams
- Analyzes existing research and industry practices to identify common RDF stream patterns
- Provides a conceptual framework to categorize and reason about RDF stream types
Plain English Explanation
The paper aims to create a taxonomy, or a systematic classification, for the different types of RDF (Resource Description Framework) streams. RDF is a way of representing data and information on the web, and RDF streams are dynamic, continuously evolving data sources.
The researchers analyzed existing research and industry practices to identify common patterns and characteristics of RDF streams. Based on this analysis, they developed a conceptual framework to categorize and understand the different types of RDF streams. This taxonomy can help researchers and practitioners working with RDF data to better organize and reason about the various forms that RDF streams can take.
By having a shared understanding and terminology for RDF stream types, the research community can more effectively communicate about and build applications that work with dynamic RDF data. The taxonomy provides a common language and structure to discuss the unique properties and requirements of different RDF stream scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The paper first conducts a literature review to identify existing research and industry practices related to RDF streams. The review covers a range of application domains, including forest fire management, digital twins, and semantic publishing.
Based on this analysis, the authors propose a taxonomy that categorizes RDF streams along three dimensions: Temporality, Volatility, and Observability. The Temporality dimension distinguishes between discrete and continuous RDF streams, the Volatility dimension captures the rate of change in the RDF data, and the Observability dimension reflects whether the RDF stream is directly observable or inferred.
The authors then demonstrate the utility of this taxonomy by classifying various RDF stream use cases from the literature review. This exercise validates the taxonomy's ability to accurately represent the diversity of RDF stream types encountered in research and practice.
Critical Analysis
The proposed taxonomy provides a useful conceptual framework for reasoning about the different characteristics of RDF streams. By identifying the key dimensions along which RDF streams can vary, the taxonomy helps to structure the design space and highlight important distinctions that may impact the requirements and implementation of RDF stream processing systems.
However, the paper acknowledges that the taxonomy is not exhaustive, and there may be additional dimensions or nuances that are not captured. Additionally, the boundaries between the various categories may not always be clear-cut, and real-world RDF streams may exhibit a blend of characteristics across the dimensions.
Further research could explore the practical implications of the taxonomy, such as how it informs the design of RDF stream management systems, data modeling approaches, or reasoning techniques. Empirical studies validating the taxonomy's ability to accurately describe and predict the behavior of RDF streams in diverse application domains would also strengthen the research.
Conclusion
This paper presents a taxonomy for systematizing the different types of RDF streams encountered in research and practice. By identifying the key dimensions of Temporality, Volatility, and Observability, the taxonomy provides a conceptual framework for reasoning about the unique properties and requirements of various RDF stream scenarios.
The taxonomy can serve as a foundation for improving the communication and coordination within the RDF stream research community, as well as informing the design of more robust and effective RDF stream management systems. As the field of RDF stream processing continues to evolve, this taxonomy offers a valuable tool for organizing and understanding the diverse landscape of RDF stream types.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
RDF Stream Taxonomy: Systematizing RDF Stream Types in Research and Practice
Piotr Sowinski, Pawel Szmeja, Maria Ganzha, Marcin Paprzycki
Over the years, RDF streaming was explored in research and practice from many angles, resulting in a wide range of RDF stream definitions. This variety presents a major challenge in discussing and integrating streaming systems, due to the lack of a common language. This work attempts to address this critical research gap, by systematizing RDF stream types present in the literature in a novel taxonomy. The proposed RDF Stream Taxonomy (RDF-STaX) is embodied in an OWL 2 DL ontology that follows the FAIR principles, making it readily applicable in practice. Extensive documentation and additional resources are provided, to foster the adoption of the ontology. Three use cases for the ontology are presented with accompanying competency questions, demonstrating the usefulness of the resource. Additionally, this work introduces a novel nanopublications dataset, which serves as a collaborative, living state-of-the-art review of RDF streaming. The results of a multifaceted evaluation of the resource are presented, testing its logical validity, use case coverage, and adherence to the community's best practices, while also comparing it to other works. RDF-STaX is expected to help drive innovation in RDF streaming, by fostering scientific discussion, cooperation, and tool interoperability.
Read more6/28/2024
💬
0
Stream Types
Joseph W. Cutler, Christopher Watson, Emeka Nkurumeh, Phillip Hilliard, Harrison Goldstein, Caleb Stanford, Benjamin C. Pierce
We propose a rich foundational theory of typed data streams and stream transformers, motivated by two high-level goals: (1) The type of a stream should be able to express complex sequential patterns of events over time. And (2) it should describe the internal parallel structure of the stream to support deterministic stream processing on parallel and distributed systems. To these ends, we introduce stream types, with operators capturing sequential composition, parallel composition, and iteration, plus a core calculus lambda-ST of transformers over typed streams which naturally supports a number of common streaming idioms, including punctuation, windowing, and parallel partitioning, as first-class constructions. lambda-ST exploits a Curry-Howard-like correspondence with an ordered variant of the logic of Bunched Implication to program with streams compositionally and uses Brzozowski-style derivatives to enable an incremental, prefix-based operational semantics. To illustrate the programming style supported by the rich types of lambda-ST, we present a number of examples written in delta, a prototype high-level language design based on lambda-ST.
Read more4/4/2024
0
Streaming Technologies and Serialization Protocols: Empirical Performance Analysis
Samuel Jackson, Nathan Cummings, Saiful Khan
Efficiently streaming high-volume data is essential for real-time data analytics, visualization, and AI and machine learning model training. Various streaming technologies and serialization protocols have been developed to meet different streaming needs. Together, they perform differently across various tasks and datasets. Therefore, when developing a streaming system, it can be challenging to make an informed decision on the suitable combination, as we encountered when implementing streaming for the UKAEA's MAST data or SKA's radio astronomy data. This study addresses this gap by proposing an empirical study of widely used data streaming technologies and serialization protocols. We introduce an extensible and open-source software framework to benchmark their efficiency across various performance metrics. Our findings reveal significant performance differences and trade-offs between these technologies. These insights can help in choosing suitable streaming and serialization solutions for contemporary data challenges. We aim to provide the scientific community and industry professionals with the knowledge to optimize data streaming for better data utilization and real-time analysis.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Toward FAIR Semantic Publishing of Research Dataset Metadata in the Open Research Knowledge Graph
Raia Abu Ahmad, Jennifer D'Souza, Matthaus Zloch, Wolfgang Otto, Georg Rehm, Allard Oelen, Stefan Dietze, Soren Auer
Search engines these days can serve datasets as search results. Datasets get picked up by search technologies based on structured descriptions on their official web pages, informed by metadata ontologies such as the Dataset content type of schema.org. Despite this promotion of the content type dataset as a first-class citizen of search results, a vast proportion of datasets, particularly research datasets, still need to be made discoverable and, therefore, largely remain unused. This is due to the sheer volume of datasets released every day and the inability of metadata to reflect a dataset's content and context accurately. This work seeks to improve this situation for a specific class of datasets, namely research datasets, which are the result of research endeavors and are accompanied by a scholarly publication. We propose the ORKG-Dataset content type, a specialized branch of the Open Research Knowledge Graoh (ORKG) platform, which provides descriptive information and a semantic model for research datasets, integrating them with their accompanying scholarly publications. This work aims to establish a standardized framework for recording and reporting research datasets within the ORKG-Dataset content type. This, in turn, increases research dataset transparency on the web for their improved discoverability and applied use. In this paper, we present a proposal -- the minimum FAIR, comparable, semantic description of research datasets in terms of salient properties of their supporting publication. We design a specific application of the ORKG-Dataset semantic model based on 40 diverse research datasets on scientific information extraction.
Read more4/15/2024